I am disappointed, wanted our PM to visit Jaffna: Salman Khurshid \COLOMBO: External affairs minister Salman Khurshid expressed regret on Friday that Prime Minister Manmohan Singh could not visit Jaffna, a feat undertaken by his British counterpart David Cameron, who became the first head of government to visit the war-torn northern province in Sri Lanka since its independence in 1948. "Is it not sad? Who is to blame? I wanted my PM to go there first. I was the second Indian foreign minister to go there (after the war). But who do I blame for it. I am only disappointed that I could not take the prime minister to an area where we are building 50,000 houses. We can't show him this and the roads and projects that we are building (in Jaffna)," he told reporters. Khurshid was answering questions on the historic visit Cameron made to Jaffna after the opening ceremony of the Commonwealth summit in a public relations disaster for Sri Lanka. There were plans for Prime Minister Singh to visit Jaffna before going to Colombo for the summit but it was nixed by the strong opposition from Tamil Nadu. Northern province chief minister CS Wigneswaran had invited Singh to visit Jaffna. Khurshid said he did not want to blame anyone. "Let the people judge whether their (those objecting PM's visit to Sri Lanka) strategy has brought benefit. My objective is to get the Sri Lankans to get back on their feet and have self confidence," he said. Asked about the divisions within the Congress party and the government on this issue, Khurshid said it was not a division as only different view points have been expressed. While the Prime Minister did not visit Sri Lanka, it was decided that there will be no boycott because India has to remain engaged with Sri Lanka. "I think to say that our party and the Cabinet was divided is unfair to them. Everything was taken into account â€” short term and long term issues â€” and a view prevailed that we should not boycott but we should remain engaged (with Sri Lanka)," he said. Khurshid also made it clear that India has conveyed to Sri Lanka its concerns over the alleged gross abuse of human rights during the war against the LTTE and for not properly addressing the concerns of the Tamils on the issue. "Our stand has been exactly that there has to be truth and reconciliation must go on. If you want to move and build a society, then you need to address their (Tamils') concerns. These are very serious concerns and they will have to address them within Sri Lanka not in New Delhi or Washington," he said when asked about India's stand on the allegations of war crimes during the campaign against LTTE. Countries like Britain and Canada have openly expressed their reservations over Sri Lanka rejecting demands for independent probe into these allegations, an issue that has clouded the ongoing Commonwealth summit. The minister said India can only express its concerns while it was for the people and government of Sri Lanka to address them. "Our job is to help them and incentivize them to do it. It is a sovereign government and it is their responsibility. We are impacted and affected (by events here) and the Sri Lankan government has to address them because it helps both of us," he said. "If we can be of some help, we will be of help," he said. I am disappointed, wanted our PM to visit Jaffna: Salman Khurshid - The Times of India ******************************************************************* Khurshid expressed regret on Friday that Prime Minister Manmohan Singh could not visit Jaffna, a feat undertaken by his British counterpart David Cameron, who became the first head of government to visit the war-torn northern province in Sri Lanka since its independence in 1948. "Is it not sad? Who is to blame? I wanted my PM to go there first. Look at the flippancy of this man who is our Foreign Minister. Instead of concentrating in finetuning the Foreign Pollicy initiative for CHOGM in the light of the allegations of SL atrocities, he thinks that the PM should have been a political Usman Bolt! He laments that he can't show the projects India has undertaken in North SL. Does a man have to visit to see it to believe. Has the PM no faith in the Foreign Minister, if he videotapes it and shows? Or is the PM an experience bricklayer, who by feeling could comment on the quality of construction made of brick and cement that he required to be there in person? So the Congress Party was not divided on whether the PM should go to Colombo or not. Great. In other words, is he saying that the PM himself was dithering and is still dithering as is his usual form? Why is Khurshed letting the PM down? It has now become a fashion in the UPA to blame the poor chap for all the faults, as did the Indian Princeling. Khurshed is proving to be a chump and quite a clueless chap!