- Joined
- Dec 17, 2009
- Messages
- 13,811
- Likes
- 6,734
Anyone notice the discrepancies between these two photos?ship-launched version, HHQ9
Anyone notice the discrepancies between these two photos?ship-launched version, HHQ9
Actually they are both fake. You can tell in the first photo by the listing of missile. It can't start at an angle until after the rocket motor has begun to power its flight. The 2nd is a fake because the ejection system is not solid fuel, far too much white billowy smoke.all of them are real photo
All Vertical Cold Launch system has an eject angle.It can't start at an angle until after the rocket motor has begun to power its flight.
http://v.ku6.com/special/show_2936936/mUHMywGaaoW0Uary.htmlThe 2nd is a fake because the ejection system is not solid fuel, far too much white billowy smoke.
Verticle launchers launch vertically, not at an angle. Your video at 2:14 shows what I am saying perfectly. At 2:10 you will also see that it doesn't emit solid booster white smoke as seen in the 2nd photo before it is finished ejecting. You just proved my point.All Vertical Cold Launch system has an eject angle.
http://v.ku6.com/special/show_2936936/mUHMywGaaoW0Uary.html
drag to 2:10, HQ9 land launch, also has much smoke.
No, I am not an Indian. I am European.Armand2REP, are you an Indian?
According to me the first launch is real.Actually they are both fake. You can tell in the first photo by the listing of missile. It can't start at an angle until after the rocket motor has begun to power its flight. The 2nd is a fake because the ejection system is not solid fuel, far too much white billowy smoke.
You just contradicted yourself... if the ejection systems are smokey, the first picture which you vouch for as real would have more smoke.According to me the first launch is real.
In the 2nd photo it looks like none of the silos are open. There cannot be a launch without an open silo, unless the smoke covered a second set of silos.
It is possible the launch failed, which can explain the smoke.
Or Chinese ejection systems are very smokey, perhaps one of the first launches of the missile.
the last order of S300 was placed in 2005 . CHina placed the order becausewhy is China still buying s-300 if HQ-9 is developed?? is there any other answer than the obvious??
Why do you Chinese keep posting all these fake pictures? Isn't it obvious to you it is fake? The missile is far bigger than its launch container. Another photochop by 50 cent Army.more launch photo
Thread starter | Similar threads | Forum | Replies | Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
Hongqi will bring premium minivan HQ9 to Russia | Europe and Russia | 6 | ||
D | FD2000 Export Model of HQ9 Reveals in Zhuhai | China | 9 | |
HQ9 failed | China | 6 | ||
HQ9 and S300 side by side | Military Multimedia | 10 |