How Mobile are our Missile Launchers

Discussion in 'Strategic Forces' started by Jagdish58, Aug 13, 2014.

  1. Jagdish58

    Jagdish58 Regular Member

    Joined:
    Feb 5, 2014
    Messages:
    759
    Likes Received:
    571
    Location:
    Bangalore
    Agni-V TEL is way too longer than the actual missile
    [​IMG]

    How Road mobile are our ballistic missiles are ? Well it all depends on how mobile are our transporter erector launcher (TEL). TEL are the prime movers which carry ballistic missiles, around the country .In India Agni series of missiles are usually seen on Multi-Axle Tractor trailers based on Not so Military grade trucks .

    When we showed a picture of Agni V missile from Republic parade to an old friend in Tata Trucks handling Heavy Commercial Vehicles , his instant reply was They are good to carry Heavy duty Cargos and Machinery .But when asked about Mobility and all terrain features , Answers were not so favorable .
    TEL currently used by India are either based on Ashok Leyland Tractor trailers for Agni I- and II or Volvo Tractor trailers for Agni III/ IV/V series of missiles . This Tractor trailers are modified in house by DRDO to carry missiles and to launch , but Trucks used are usually Civilian variants Procured directly from the Truck Manufactures . since Indian Agni missile series still lack canisters based storage, it makes them more vulnerable to attack, since they are easy to spot by the enemy and they cannot be easily moved around the country without been spotted .

    [​IMG]

    DRDO recently successfully evaluated Transport-cum-Tilting vehicle-5 (TCT-5) for canister-based missile Agni 5 and plans are in place to make all Agni series of missiles canister based to give better and safer Road mobility . But use of Tractor trailers again with Commercially designed trucks, will still make them ridiculously longer than the missile size and not compact enough for faster mobility, Deployment or relocation in shortest period of time .

    [​IMG]



    Russian RS-24 Yars’ ICBM

    If we have a look at TEL used by Russia on their long range ballistic missiles, you will instantly notice that they are much more compact and are based on specifically designed trucks for different missile systems which gives them better mobility and faster time to relocate if spotted . China till few years used Similar canister based Tractor trailers TEL for their long range missiles , But now Newer missile variants are seen with Russian Style like TEL, which have improved mobility , all-terrain and off road capability of this missile systems .


    [​IMG]


    Well a simple look at above image comparison of 2500 km Shaheen II missiles deployed by arch rivals Pakistan, to Agni-II TEL will let you know which missile has better Road mobility when compared head on, But Pakistani missiles still lack Canister variants, leading to higher deployment time to prepare missile .TEL developed for Canister based Shaurya Missile , is much better design and provide higher mobility .DRDO Should work with Indian truck manufactures to bring out Specific missile based , Canister equipped, compact missile TEL in future . With India’s No first Nuke policy means , Land based Mobile missiles systems, will be hunted by Enemy forces to stop any retaliation, in case of nuclear attack on India . Induction of SLBM equipped Nuclear SSBN in large numbers will take another decade or so , India has to improve on TEL for their missile systems .



    [​IMG]
     
  2.  
  3. pmaitra

    pmaitra Moderator Moderator

    Joined:
    Mar 10, 2009
    Messages:
    31,650
    Likes Received:
    17,146
    Location:
    EST, USA
    Is this article from IDRW?
     
  4. Jagdish58

    Jagdish58 Regular Member

    Joined:
    Feb 5, 2014
    Messages:
    759
    Likes Received:
    571
    Location:
    Bangalore
    pmaitra likes this.
  5. pmaitra

    pmaitra Moderator Moderator

    Joined:
    Mar 10, 2009
    Messages:
    31,650
    Likes Received:
    17,146
    Location:
    EST, USA
    No problem. It was an easy guess, looking at the punctuation horrors in the article. Most IDRW articles are rather shoddily edited, from the grammatical point of view.
     
    charlie and Singh like this.
  6. LETHALFORCE

    LETHALFORCE Moderator Moderator

    Joined:
    Feb 16, 2009
    Messages:
    20,543
    Likes Received:
    6,547
    Focus should be on SLBM's and MIRV which will ensure mobility and second strike
    Guarantee.
     
    sesha_maruthi27 likes this.
  7. Jagdish58

    Jagdish58 Regular Member

    Joined:
    Feb 5, 2014
    Messages:
    759
    Likes Received:
    571
    Location:
    Bangalore
  8. p2prada

    p2prada Stars and Ambassadors Stars and Ambassadors

    Joined:
    May 25, 2009
    Messages:
    10,233
    Likes Received:
    3,896
    Location:
    Holy Hell
    And underwater silos.
     
    rishivashista13 and LETHALFORCE like this.
  9. Eastman

    Eastman Regular Member

    Joined:
    Sep 25, 2013
    Messages:
    325
    Likes Received:
    169
    Location:
    Bye Bye DFI
  10. perplexed

    perplexed Regular Member

    Joined:
    Oct 4, 2011
    Messages:
    11
    Likes Received:
    3
    Current canisterization and mobility levels sucks for indian missiles !
     
  11. Bornubus

    Bornubus Senior Member Senior Member

    Joined:
    Oct 13, 2015
    Messages:
    4,174
    Likes Received:
    6,968
    Pathetic !


    __________________________
     
  12. Black knight

    Black knight Regular Member

    Joined:
    Oct 11, 2015
    Messages:
    52
    Likes Received:
    9
    Location:
    chennai
    Clearly this is an eye opener for the strategic forces bcoz hw long it will take 4 pakistan 2 beg china for canister technology . Now a days anyone with decent drone can identify potential targets even destroy it and how can we hide these canisters during war?
     
  13. rishivashista13

    rishivashista13 Regular Member

    Joined:
    Jun 6, 2016
    Messages:
    453
    Likes Received:
    263
    Yes , underwater silos are best i think . They are way more secure and undetectable as Gps and other navigation systems , satellites can't se under water .

    Sent from my Micromax Q380 using Tapatalk
     

Share This Page