How can we improve Indian Railways?

sob

Mod
Joined
May 4, 2009
Messages
6,425
Likes
3,805
Country flag
The whole point is that when there is question of safety and the lives of the passengers concerned , IR should not be looking at cheap technology. They should focus on companies/countries which have the best combination of technology and a proven safety record.
 

sob

Mod
Joined
May 4, 2009
Messages
6,425
Likes
3,805
Country flag
Pmitra, IMO Ir will have to work on seperating the passenger and freight traffic. Having them on the same track results in faster wear out and rather uncomfortable travel. Some of the tracks of South Eastern Railway which cater to large number of Coal Bearing Rakes, can be very uncomfortable to travel on.
 

Armand2REP

CHINI EXPERT
Senior Member
Joined
Dec 17, 2009
Messages
13,811
Likes
6,734
Country flag
The point is China tries to bury the evidence. It isn't safe which is why they have cancelled over half of construction.
 

Iamanidiot

Senior Member
Joined
Dec 21, 2009
Messages
5,325
Likes
1,504
Indian Railways is actualy improving significantly.With the implementation of the FIOS freight transport supervision has became a lot easier
 

Ray

The Chairman
Professional
Joined
Apr 17, 2009
Messages
43,132
Likes
23,835
The point is China tries to bury the evidence. It isn't safe which is why they have cancelled over half of construction.
Is that typically China?

They are after all picture perfect!
 

ankur26888

Regular Member
Joined
Jun 10, 2011
Messages
22
Likes
1
For expansion of indian we should also study and adopt technology of france railways which one of the most efficient railway system in all over the world
 

ankur26888

Regular Member
Joined
Jun 10, 2011
Messages
22
Likes
1
Railways in France Tourist and minor railways in France are covered in detail in a separate group of pages Mainland France The first public railway in France was officially
opened on 1st October, 1828, a year after it had
been brought into use and just three years after the
opening of the pioneering Stockton & Darlington
Railway in the United Kingdom. The French line ran
from Saint-Étienne to Andrézieux, a distance of some 18km. It was built to the standard (1435mm)
gauge that had by then become established in the
United Kingdom. The first railway in the French capital ran from the
Place de l'Europe (near the present Saint-Lazare
station) to Le Pecq, a few km short of its eventual
destination at Saint-Germain-en-Laye. In most countries, the "rule of the road" for trains is
the same as for road traffic. For example, in
England, where cars drive on the left of the road,
trains run on the left hand of a pair of rail tracks,
while in Germany, where cars drive on the right,
trains use the right hand track of the pair. France is an exception to this rule. Cars drive on the right,
but trains run on the left. This is because the early
railways were mainly built using British expertise
and standard equipment "out of the box". No
major operational problems are caused by this
discrepancy, but it did give rise to an oddity: between the end of Franco-Prussian war of 1871
and the end of the First World War, the provinces of
Alsace and Lorraine formed part of the German
Empire, and during this time their lines were
converted to right-hand running. When the
provinces were returned to France in 1919, right hand running was left in place. To cope with the
change from left hand to right hand running at
places where there was no necessity to stop for a
border crossing, a number of flyovers or sauts de
mouton (literally, "sheep jumps") were installed
whose sole purpose was to take one running line over the top of another in the opposite direction. The Paris Métro also runs on the right; this is
believed to be because the first lines, opened at the
beginning of the 20th century, were closely based
on electric tram technology and operation. Paris
trams of course had to run on the right when
operating in the streets. Although the early railways were for the most part
developed by private companies, there was close
State regulation which meant that there was little of
the unnecessary duplication of lines that arose in
other countries, notably the United Kingdom. By the
1870s, the bulk of the lines had been merged into just five companies: Est, Nord, PLM, PO and Ouest:
organised around groups of lines radiated from the
capital. A sixth group was owned and operated by
the State. The Ouest company eventually got into
serious financial difficulties and was taken over by
the State in 1909. This situation continued until 1938, when all the remaining companies merged
with the State system to form SNCF. Under EU regulations, train operation and
infrastructure costs must be separately
accountable. France, like many other European
countries, has chosen to implement this by
spinning off a separate infrastructure company
(RFF). Local services of SNCF have also been decentralized, on a regional basis. However, all the
companies involved are State owned, and there
appears little movement towards the introduction
of private operators to the passenger sector. A
number of independent freight operators have
appeared in reecent years but SNCF retains the majority of the freight traffic. Apart from the main line railways, there were also a
many minor railways and tramways, built to
standard or metre gauge. Some of these lines
survive as tourist operations. Like England and unlike many other European
countries, most French cities lost their urban
tramways in the latter part of the 20th Century, the
sole exception being a single line in Marseille.
However, many cities now have new tram and even
metro systems, and others are projected or in the course of being built.
 

AprilLyrics

Regular Member
Joined
Jan 2, 2011
Messages
380
Likes
54
if india friends can drop ur prejudice,i think china's high speed train should be a choice.

china and india have similarities.unlike Japan,German and France,we r developing countries.so there would be problems that those developing countries never meet wiith.for example,we need to transport much more people,with different purchasing ability.this requires expirence on security system and controling system.undoubtly,china is good at this.and the huge transport during the Spring Festival period is well-known by world.what's more,we have found the problem of HST system and corrected it.

HST system is not only about the high speed train itself,it is about a complex system.
 

guoyinag

Regular Member
Joined
Nov 11, 2009
Messages
47
Likes
1
The point is China tries to bury the evidence. It isn't safe which is why they have cancelled over half of construction.
long time no see, missing you so much.:wave:

The real point is we are learning lessons from this accident and improving HSR system.

[video]http://v.youku.com/v_show/id_XMzI0MDg4ODM2.html[/video]

This video is a long term plan of our HSR system made in Shanghai expo 2010.

7.23 accident is a tragedy we do not want to see and we hope will never happen again. this single accident will not shut Chinese HSR development down, lot of new railways are completed in 2011 and will be completed in 2012 and next few years. thanks to the accident, we are operating this system more carefully.

If India friends are interesting in these systems, maybe it will be a good start to cooperate. Since we can supply not only the locomotive and trains but also the whole system including train, railway, station and also signal equipment.
 

mylegend

Regular Member
Joined
Nov 30, 2011
Messages
430
Likes
96
For expansion of indian we should also study and adopt technology of france railways which one of the most efficient railway system in all over the world
Actually Japanese have better record than the French, and they have the only profitable bullet train line in developed nation, French is umm... France is just France... working low hours and strike for fun regardless of convenience of the public. Their railway system is not profitable and much more expensive than Chinese one.

HSR can be a pain when it need eternal subsidization.
 
Last edited:

Blackwater

Senior Member
Joined
Jan 9, 2012
Messages
21,156
Likes
12,211
Sorry unfortunately never. The foundation of Indian railway is based on quantity rather than quality. Railways in India is focused on catering huge population not quality.

Other factor are security issues and political will.....:sad::sad::sad:
 

arya

Senior Member
Joined
Sep 14, 2009
Messages
3,006
Likes
1,531
Country flag
we need speed railways and have to increase our quality and quantity
 

Blackwater

Senior Member
Joined
Jan 9, 2012
Messages
21,156
Likes
12,211
arya;423110[COLOR="#FF0000" said:
]we need speed railways [/COLOR]and have to increase our quality and quantity
not possible

who will take care of things mention below on tracks...

Kutta
Billy
Maj
Katta
Tractor
Terrorists

last but not least

People doing shit on tracks:p:p:cool2::cool2::lol:
 

satish007

Senior Member
Joined
May 7, 2011
Messages
1,458
Likes
203
actually , India has found the right way to work with China. use China reasonable price product and serivce, hire Western Countris's QA(such as ARMREP,that guy must try his best to find defect) to make sure quality.
save money and able to get more good planes, if China want to do any mean thing, you guys can beat them use these planes and even don't need to pay rest of money. why not use Chinese?
 
Last edited:

Blackwater

Senior Member
Joined
Jan 9, 2012
Messages
21,156
Likes
12,211
actually , India has found the right way to work with China. use China reasonable price product and serivce, hire Western Countris's QA(such as ARMREP,that guy must try his best to find defect) to make sure quality.
save money and able to get more good planes, if China want to do any mean thing, you guys can beat them use these planes and even don't need to pay rest of money. why not use Chinese?

satishhhhh kidda poranthe kathe ka nahi aaj:cool2::cool2:
 

Kunal Biswas

Member of the Year 2011
Ambassador
Joined
May 26, 2010
Messages
31,122
Likes
41,042
I thought this was about making the trains better ourselves, the title let me believe so, Which is not so so..

I travel lot, I believe

1. We need space,
2. 3 AC only should be in garib rath, Fair need to be reduce for 2nd AC
3. AC coaches needed to be increased in Express trains
4. Food needed to be improved..
5. Electric plugs for every seat, Cup holder and Lamp for every seat in AC

Few more can be added, There is no problem with speed, Durant is fast train, What makes it fast is less stoppages..
 

Singh

Phat Cat
Super Mod
Joined
Feb 23, 2009
Messages
20,311
Likes
8,403
Country flag
We need to corporatize Railways, reduce staff, reduce frills and amenities, go for minimalism.

And we need bullet trains.

If a person sitting in Jaipur, Chandigarh, Meerut, would be able to reach Central Delhi in an hour, I tell you there will be an economic revolution in India.
 

H.A.

Senior Member
Joined
Dec 24, 2011
Messages
1,445
Likes
687
We need to corporatize Railways, reduce staff, reduce frills and amenities, go for minimalism.
I think that would not be required, If a person like Lalu could make the railway's profitable without taking any negative action then anyone else can also do it. It just needs some sense and proper thinking along with planning.

Bullet trains later, they would surely help, however the trains promised to connect various stations are not being implemented in the first place, they should concentrate on connectivity along with the introduction of bullet / high speed trains.
 

Latest Replies

Global Defence

New threads

Articles

Top