How Balochistan became a part of Pakistan – a historical perspective

Discussion in 'Pakistan' started by Mikesingh, Aug 22, 2016.

  1. Mikesingh

    Mikesingh Senior Member Senior Member

    Joined:
    Sep 7, 2015
    Messages:
    1,083
    Likes Received:
    1,351
    The true history of Balochistan is never shared or talked about among the general public of Pakistan.

    [​IMG]

    Balochistan consists of the south west of Pakistan. In the west it borders with Afghanistan and Iran and in the south it has the Arabian Sea. It accounts for nearly half the land mass of Pakistan and only 3.6% of its total population. The province is immensely rich in natural resources, including oil, gas, copper and gold. Despite these huge deposits of mineral wealth, the area is one of the poorest regions of Pakistan.

    A vast majority of its population lives in deplorable housing conditions where they don’t have access to electricity or clean drinking water. Before the partition of India and Pakistan, Balochistan consisted of four princely states under the British Raj. These were Kalat, Lasbela, Kharan and Makran. Two of these provinces, Lasbela and Kharan, were fiduciary states placed under Khan of Kalat's rule by the British, as was Makran which was a district of Kalat.

    Three months before the formation of Pakistan, Muhammed Ali Jinnah had negotiated the freedom of Baluchistan under Kalat from the British. Discussions were made about Kalat's relationship with Pakistan as it was formed. This ensued a series of meetings between the Viceroy, as the Crown’s Representative, Jinnah and the Khan of Kalat. This resulted in a communique on August 11, 1947, which stated that:

    a. The Government of Pakistan recognizes Kalat as an independent sovereign state in treaty relations with the British Government with a status different from that of Indian States.

    b. Legal opinion will be sought as to whether or not agreements of leases will be inherited by the Pakistan Government.

    c. Meanwhile, a Standstill Agreement has been made between Pakistan and Kalat.

    d. Discussions will take place between Pakistan and Kalat at Karachi at an early date with a view to reaching decisions on Defence, External Affairs and Communications.


    Referring to a telegram of October 17, 1947 from Grafftey-Smith, the Political Department, in a note on Pakistan-Kalat negotiations, says that Jinnah had second thoughts regarding the recognition of Kalat as an independent sovereign state, and was now desirous of obtaining its accession in the same form as was accepted by other rulers who joined Pakistan. The same note mentioned that an interesting situation is developing as Pakistan might accept the accession of Kalat’s two feudatories, Lasbela and Kharan.

    By October 1947, Quaid-i-Azam Muhammad Ali Jinnah had a change of heart on the recognition of Kalat as an “Independent and a Sovereign State”, and wanted the Khan to sign the same form of instrument of accession as the other states which had joined Pakistan. The Khan was unwilling to abandon the nominally achieved independent status but ready to concede on defence, foreign affairs and communications. However, he was unwilling to sign either a treaty or an Instrument, until and unless he had got a satisfactory agreement on the leased areas. Fears were also being voiced that officials of the Government of Pakistan might start dealing with the two feudatories of Las Bela and Kharan, and accept their de facto accession.

    By February 1948, the discussions between Kalat and the Government of Pakistan were coming to a head. The Quaid wrote to the Khan of Kalat: “I advise you to join Pakistan without further delay…and let me have your final reply which you promised to do after your stay with me in Karachi when we fully discussed the whole question in all its aspects.” On February 15, 1948, Jinnah visited Sibi, Baluchistan and addressed a Royal Durbar, where he announced that until the Pakistan Constitution is finally written in about two years’ time, he would govern the province with the help of an advisory council that he would nominate. However, the main reason for Jinnah’s visit was to persuade the Khan of Kalat to accede to Pakistan. As it transpired, the Khan failed to turn up for the final meeting with him, pleading illness. In his letter to Jinnah, he said that he had summoned both Houses of the Parliament, Dar-ul-Umara and Dar-ul-Awam, for their opinion about the future relations with the Dominion of Pakistan, and he would inform him about their opinion by the end of the month.

    When the Dar-ul-Awam of Kalat met on February 21, 1948, it decided not to accede, but to negotiate a treaty to determine Kalat’s future relations with Pakistan. On March 9, 1948 the Khan received communication from JInnah announcing that he had decided not to deal personally with the Kalat state negotiations, which would henceforth be dealt with by the Pakistan Government. So far there had not been any formal negotiations but only an informal request made by Jinnah to the Khan at Sibi.

    The US Ambassador to Pakistan in his dispatch home on March 23, 1948 informed that on March 18, “Kharan, Lasbela and Mekran, feudatory states of Kalat” had acceded to Pakistan. The Khan of Kalat objected to their accession, arguing that it was a violation of Kalat’s Standstill Agreement with Pakistan. He also said that while Kharan and Lasbela were its feudatories, Mekran was a district of Kalat. The British Government had placed the control of the foreign policy of the two feudatories under Kalat in July 1947, prior to partition.

    On March 26, 1948, the Pakistan Army was ordered to move into the Baloch coastal region of Pasni, Jiwani and Turbat. This was the first act of aggression prior to the march on Kalat by a Pakistani military detachment on April 1, 1948. Kalat capitulated on March 27 after the army moved into the coastal region and it was announced in Karachi that the Khan of Kalat has agreed to merge his state with Pakistan.

    Jinnah accepted this accession under the gun. It should be noted that the Balochistan Assembly had already rejected any suggestion of forfeiting the independence of Balochistan on any pretext. So even the signature of the Khan of Kalat taken under the barrel of the gun, was not viable, because the parliament had rejected the accession and the accession was never mandated by the British Empire either, who had given Balochistan under Kalat independence before India.

    The sovereign Baloch state after British withdrawal from India lasted only 227 days. During this time Baluchistan had a flag flying in its embassy in Karachi where its ambassador to Pakistan lived. To say that the Baloch have been ill-treated by all governments and military establishments since their land was illegally and forcefully taken over would be an understatement. As a result there have been continuous insurgencies, the largest of which was started in 2006 after the killing of Sardar Akber Bugti and 26 of his tribesmen by the Pakistan Army.

    A 2006 report by the Human Rights Commission of Pakistan (HRCP) documented arbitrary arrests and detentions, torture, extra judicial and summary executions, disappearances and the use of excessive and indiscriminate violence by the Pakistan police, military, security agencies and intelligence forces. These figures are corroborated by Amnesty International.

    Kachkol Ali Baloch who is the former leader of Opposition in the Balochistan Assembly, alleged that about 4,000 people have been either missing or are detained without trial. The missing persons included around 1,000 students and political activists. Lately his own son was kidnapped and was finally released after being held captive for 14 months. Sardar Akhter Mengal, leader of the Baloch Nationalist Party (BNP) was one of the people arrested in 2006 on framed terrorism charges. The reality was he was planning a long march against the then President of Pakistan General Pervez Musharraf. He was later released in 2008 and all cases against him were dropped. The current Chief Minister of Balochistan, Dr. Abdul Malik Baloch, recently spoke at a seminar held in Punjab called ‘Stability in Balochistan – Challenges and possibilities”. He clearly stated that if the Baloch people are not given a right to the resources of their province, we would be looking at yet another insurgency and no one will be able to control it.

    The true history of Balochistan is never shared or talked about among the general public of Pakistan. Our textbooks and other publications narrate a rhetoric which is far from the truth, and which has made the general public believe in a lie. It is the responsibility of the intellectuals, the teachers and the professors to learn and reveal the real facts according to non-tempered historical documents.

    http://nation.com.pk/blogs/05-Dec-2...e-a-part-of-pakistan-a-historical-perspective

    The Khan had absolutely no authority to sign the instrument of accession as the Baloch Parliament had already passed the resolution declaring Balochistan a sovereign independent Republic in Aug 1947. So that instrument of accession is null and void unless passed by the Parliament which is the supreme authority.

    Some Pak pseudo intellectuals insist that the Parliament had given the authority to decide on the future of Balochistan to the Khan. This is complete rubbish as not a shred of evidence to back up this claim has been produced.

    The bottom line is that Pakistan has forcibly occupied the sovereign state of Balochistan which is against all norms if international behavior. The Baloch who are being persecuted since 1948 need to fight for their independence from the clutches of a police state, Pakistan. And that is where India should come in by supporting them diplomatically, politically and morally, just as Pakistan is doing in Kashmir.
     
    Indx TechStyle likes this.
  2.  
  3. rock127

    rock127 Maulana Rockullah Senior Member

    Joined:
    Aug 12, 2009
    Messages:
    8,943
    Likes Received:
    10,312
    Location:
    India
    This thread needs more attention and the below image says all in short.

    BALOCHISTAN IS A DISPUTED TERRITORY, it's occupied by Pak Army by force.

    Pak Army is doing GENOCIDE of innocent Baloch who wants Azadi.


    [​IMG]

    @Abhijat @A chauhan @Alien @alphacentury @Ancient Indian @anupamsurey @Bharat Ek Khoj @blueblood @brational @Bangalorean @Blackwater @Bornubus @bose @cobra commando @DingDong @DFI_COAS @ersakthivel @fooLIam @gpawar @guru-dutt @hit&run @HariPrasad-1 @Indx TechStyle @jackprince @Kharavela @Illusive @I_PLAY_BAD @LETHALFORCE @Lions Of Punjab @maomao @Mad Indian @OneGrimPilgrim @Peter @piKacHHu @pmaitra @porky_kicker @Razor @raja696 @Rowdy @Sakal Gharelu Ustad @saty @sydsnyper @Srinivas_K @Screambowl @sorcerer @Simple_Guy @Sylex21 @wickedone @tarunraju @TrueSpirit2 @thethinker @vayuu1 @VIP @Vishwarupa @VIP @Varahamihira @roma @Navnit Kundu

    Our esteemed Terrorist Paki Panel: @Neo @Raja.pakistani @Zarvan @musalman @Zulfiqar Khan
    How long are you gonna ignore betas?

    Balochistan is our juggu puggu vein!
    Balochistan is a CORE ISSUE!
    We give MORAL SUPPORT to Baloch Nation!
    We condemn GENOCIDE of innocent Baloch!

    FREE FREE Balochistan!!!
     
  4. Mikesingh

    Mikesingh Senior Member Senior Member

    Joined:
    Sep 7, 2015
    Messages:
    1,083
    Likes Received:
    1,351
    Treason charge on Baloch `rebels' who thanked Modi
    Omer Farooq Khan

    Islamabad:
    TNN
    Three top Baloch separatists were booked in five cases related to treason and anti-state activities on Monday for welcoming Prime Minister Narendra Modi's support for their cause and “inviting India to act against Pakistan.“

    Cases were registered against Brahamdagh Bugti, Harbiyar Marri and Banuk Karima Baloch, the exiled Baloch separatists, at five different police stations of Khuzdar district of the restive Balochistan province, on the complaints of five petitioners.

    The three Baloch biwigs were charged under sections of the Pakistan Penal Code dealing with “waging war or abetting waging of war against Pakistan“. Additionally, they were charged with “concealing with intent to facilitate design to wage war“, “concealing design to commit offence punishable with imprisonment“, and “assault or criminal force to deter public servant from discharge of his duty .“

    The petitioners claimed that the trio had supported Modi's August 15
    Independence Day speech, in which he had said that the Baloch people have thanked him for highlighting terror attacks against them by elements within Pakistan.

    “People of Balochistan, Gilgit and POK have thanked me a lot in past few days, I am grateful to them,“ Modi had said in his speech, following up on his earlier remark: “The time has come when Pakistan shall have to answer to the world for the atrocities committed by it against people in Balochistan and PoK.“

    Brahamdagh had praised Modi and India on his Facebook page after his speech, thanking them for raising their voice for the cause of the deprived Balochs. According to the FIR submitted at Saddar police station of Khuzdar, the exiled leaders, while praising Modi's statement, invited the Indian government to “attack Pakistan in their interaction with different TV channels and newspapers“. “By inviting India for aggression, they've committed treason and a case of treason (must) be registered against them,“ the FIR said.

    Brahamdagh, the disgruntled Baloch leader, has been in exile in Switzerland since the killing of his grandfather, Nawab Akbar Khan Bugti, by security forces in 2006.

    PM takes a swipe at Pakistan

    Pledging India's support to Afghanistan, PM Narendra Modi told President Ashraf Ghani it “saddens us to see that your proud nation continues to be challenged by externally-sponsored instruments and entities of violence and terror“ a barely veiled reference to Pakistan.

    Modi, along with the Afghan President, jointly inaugurated the restored Stor Palace in Kabul through a video conference. The palace is located on a hilltop and was built by Afghan King Amanullah Khan in the 1920s. Ghani was quoted as saying the “logic“ of peace and benevolence would defeat the logic of terror and violence as he stated that India and Afghanistan have always been close friends and joint initiatives like these are a fruitful journey of cooperation.

    http://epaperbeta.timesofindia.com/...Baloch-rebels-who-thanked-Modi-23082016008033

    I think it's high time we do the same and put the Hurriyat morons in the block-hole till the cows come home, for sedition and waging war against the state. But I don't think we have the balls to do it.

     
  5. Blackwater

    Blackwater Veteran Member Veteran Member

    Joined:
    Jan 9, 2012
    Messages:
    21,000
    Likes Received:
    11,839
    Location:
    Akhand Bharat
    main reason for sleeping with china and involve them in gawadar as pakis knew alone it cant save Baluchistan
     
    Mikesingh and Indx TechStyle like this.
  6. Indx TechStyle

    Indx TechStyle Perfaarmance Naarmal Senior Member

    Joined:
    Apr 29, 2015
    Messages:
    7,169
    Likes Received:
    7,723
    Location:
    21°N 78°E / 21°N 78°E
    And detachment of Baluchistan can affect ONE BELT ONE ROAD policy.:biggrin2:
     
  7. aditya10r

    aditya10r PHAK MU LUCK Senior Member

    Joined:
    Mar 19, 2016
    Messages:
    1,530
    Likes Received:
    1,443
    Location:
    patna
    not affect,will kill OBOR policy
     
    Indx TechStyle likes this.
  8. Indx TechStyle

    Indx TechStyle Perfaarmance Naarmal Senior Member

    Joined:
    Apr 29, 2015
    Messages:
    7,169
    Likes Received:
    7,723
    Location:
    21°N 78°E / 21°N 78°E
    Hm abhi zinda hain mere bhai.
    We can revive by giving the route.:D
     
  9. sorcerer

    sorcerer Senior Member Senior Member

    Joined:
    Apr 13, 2013
    Messages:
    6,203
    Likes Received:
    5,119
    Location:
    India
    On pakistan request chinese would send 15 chinese "patrol" people into balochistan.and they would pitch tent inside the balochistan, claiming it as theirs..
    thats chinese way of "Assertion" or how their media puts it "the need to resolve disputes peacefully"

    on a serious note..
    pak felt that chinese would show the same vigor they showed in south china sea on Balochistan.
    Wel!!! Thats like china opening war on many different fronts!
     

Share This Page