I have debated many hindoos, mainly brahmins, in the past and all of them whine and cry about supposedly evil Muslim rule. What is surprising is that brahmins benefited the most from Muslim rule in getting cozy government positions from the Muslims who they regarded as fellow Caucasoids while the Australoid peasantry (who before were mainly Buddhist), the very substratum of Indian population, suffered like they did before under brahmins. Even so, it is brahmins who complain most about Muslim rule while ignoring the role of their ancestors in violently exterminating Buddhism in India. Due to this one of the biggest myths that brahmins and other caucasoid historians (hence honorary Aryan) is the "tolerant" nature of hindoo rulers. I have collected massive evidence of brahminical atrocities against the Australoid Buddhist which resulted in their extirpation from India. In fact the Hindus collaborated with the Muslims in killing Buddhists in India which has been revealed in a new well researched book called "Hardship and Downfall of Buddhism in India". The Hindu kshatriyas had treated the Buddhist Australoids so badly that they had infact welcomed Muslim rule, and mass converted to Islam to spite the oppressive brahmin buffoons. As noted earlier I mentioned how Hindus had killed Buddhism in India by genocide and evidence I have. I will get to that soon enough, but first let us look at the Jains who were massacred by brahmins all over south India. Look at Meenakshipuram where fanatical hindus have carvings celebrating the impalement of tens of thousands of Jaina monks. Truly sickening and tells us of the intolerant roots of "hindooism". I gave this example to show how it was not only the Buddhists that were killed by the Hindoos. More posts to follow.