Govt behind parliament attack, 26/11, says former Indian officer

[DEJAVU]

Govt behind parliament attack, 26/11, says former Indian officer

NEW DELHI: An Indian home ministry former officer has disclosed that a member of the secret service team had accused incumbent governments of "orchestrating" the terror attack on Parliament and the 26/11 carnage in Mumbai.



According to Indian media, R V S Mani, who as home ministry under-secretary signed the affidavits submitted in court in the Ishrat Jahan encounter case, has said that Satish Verma, until recently a part of the CBI-SIT probe team, told him that both the terror attacks were set up "with the objective of strengthening the counter-terror legislation (sic)".



Mani has said that Verma "...narrated that the 13.12. 2001 (attack on Parliament) was followed by Pota (Prevention of Terrorist Activities Act) and 26/11 2008 (terrorists' siege of Mumbai) was followed by amendment to the UAPA (Unlawful Activities Prevention Act)."



The official has alleged Verma levelled the damaging charge while debunking IB's inputs labelling the three killed with Ishrat in the June 2004 encounter as Lashkar terrorists.



Contacted by TOI, Verma refused to comment. "I don't know what the complaint is, made when and to whom. Nor am I interested in knowing. I cannot speak to the media on such matters. Ask the CBI," said the Gujarat cadre IPS officer who after being relieved from the SIT is working as principal of the Junagadh Police Training College.



It may be recalled that Afzal Guru and Ajmal Kasab have already been hanged in parliament and 26/11 cases respectively.

Govt behind parliament attack, 26/11, says former Indian officer - thenews.com.pk

 

[DEJAVU]

Govt behind Parliament attack, 26/11: Ishrat probe officer

NEW DELHI: In what is certain to escalate the already vicious fight between the CBI and the IB over the IshratJahan "fake encounter case", a former home ministry officer has alleged that a member of the CBI-SIT team had accused incumbent governments of "orchestrating" the terror attack on Parliament and the 26/11 carnage in Mumbai.

R V S Mani, who as home ministry under-secretary signed the affidavits submitted in court in the alleged encounter case, has said that Satish Verma, until recently a part of the CBI-SIT probe team, told him that both the terror attacks were set up "with the objective of strengthening the counter-terror legislation (sic)".

Mani has said that Verma "...narrated that the 13.12. 2001(attack on Parliament) was followed by Pota (Prevention of Terrorist Activities Act) and 26/11 2008 (terrorists' siege of Mumbai) was followed by amendment to the UAPA (Unlawful Activities Prevention Act)."

The official has alleged Verma levelled the damaging charge while debunking IB's inputs labelling the three killed with Ishrat in the June 2004 encounter as Lashkar terrorists.

Contacted by TOI, Verma refused to comment. "I don't know what the complaint is, made when and to whom. Nor am I interested in knowing. I cannot speak to the media on such matters. Ask the CBI," said the Gujarat cadre IPS officer who after being relieved from the SIT is working as principal of the Junagadh Police Training College.

Mani, currently posted as deputy land and development officer in the urban development ministry, has written to his seniors that he retorted to Verma's comments telling the IPS officer that he was articulating the views of Pakistani intelligence agency ISI.

According to him, the charge was levelled by Verma in Gandhinagar on June 22 while questioning Mani about the two home ministry affidavits in the alleged encounter case.

In his letter to the joint secretary in the urban development ministry, Mani has accused Verma of "coercing" him into signing a statement that is at odds with facts as he knew them. He said Verma wanted him to sign a statement saying that the home ministry's first affidavit in the Ishrat case was drafted by two IB officers. "Knowing fully well that this would tantamount to falsely indicting of (sic) my seniors at the extant time, I declined to sign any statement."

Giving the context in which Verma allegedly levelled the serious charge against the government, Mani said the IPS officer, while questioning him, had raised doubts about the genuineness of IB's counter-terror intelligence. He disputed the veracity of the input on the antecedents of the three killed in June 2004 on the outskirts of Ahmedabad with Ishrat in the alleged encounter which has since become a polarizing issue while fuelling Congress's fight with Gujarat CM Narendra Modi.

Gujarat Police has justified the encounter citing the IB report that Pakistani nationals Zeeshan Zohar, Amzad Ali Rana and Javed Sheikh were part of a Lashkar module which had reached Gujarat to target Modi and carry out terrorist attacks.

In its first affidavit, filed in August 2009, the home ministry had cited IB inputs that those killed with Ishrat in the alleged encounter were part of a Lashkar sleeper cell, and had objected to a CBI probe into the "encounter".

In its second affidavit, filed in September 2009, the home ministry, irked by the Gujarat government treating the first affidavit as justification of the encounter, said the IB input did not constitute conclusive proof of the terrorist antecedents of those killed. It supported the demand for a CBI probe.

Mani said Verma doubted the input saying MHA's first affidavit was actually drafted by IB officer Rajinder Kumar, who looked after IB's operations in Gujarat at the time of Ishrat "encounter" and now runs the serious risk of being chargesheeted by the CBI for hatching the conspiracy behind the alleged extra-judicial killings.

Mani said Verma stuck to his guns even after being told that the home ministry did not need outside help. The former home ministry official said Verma insisted that the "input" was prepared after the encounter.


Govt behind Parliament attack, 26/11: Ishrat probe officer - The Times of India

 

[Blackwater]

one frustrated officer,same story

 

[hit&run]

No surprise, to defend a poor Muslim Girl, this nation can go to any extent/ any lows. If Congress-I's general secretary can endorse a book that Mumbai attack was done by Hindus then why one should be stopped to have his opinion.

 

[pmaitra]

Government behind 26/11.
Government wanted to gift Aksai Chin away.
Government wanted to make a deal with Pakistan losing territory.

I have seen a lot of such news popping out of nowhere.

 

[one]

Seems like his genes got messed up when his mom visited Pakistan, nothing surprising.

 

[SilentKiller]

all false news, just propaganda....

as in 2001 BJP was in power and similarly during 26/11 Congress was in power.
This dude has lost his mind.
he is ass hole, please don't believe such news!!

 

[dhananjay1]

Well, he would be promoted now.

 

[sesha_maruthi27]

@DEJAVU, then tell about pakistan hiding osama bin laden and saying that they don't know his where about and on the other hand taking U.S. aid in the name of helping them to catch OBL. What were you guys doing with OBL and his family, giving them high security by placing them near a barracks and the military academy?

 

[sesha_maruthi27]

@DEJAVU, then tell about pakistan hiding osama bin laden and saying that they don't know his where about and on the other hand taking U.S. aid in the name of helping them to catch OBL. What were you guys doing with OBL and his family, giving them high security by placing them near a barracks and the military academy?

 

[arnabmit]

Government behind 26/11.
Government wanted to gift Aksai Chin away.
Government wanted to make a deal with Pakistan losing territory.

I have seen a lot of such news popping out of nowhere.

2014 effect.

 

[W.G.Ewald]

Government behind 26/11.
Government wanted to gift Aksai Chin away.
Government wanted to make a deal with Pakistan losing territory.

I have seen a lot of such news popping out of nowhere.

9/11 Truth movement - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Adherents of the 9/11 Truth movement dispute the accepted explanation of the September 11 attacks of 2001, that al-Qaeda terrorists hijacked four airliners and intentionally crashed two into the World Trade Center buildings and one into the Pentagon, with another unintentionally crashing in a field near Shanksville, Pennsylvania. They claim this explanation contains significant inconsistencies which suggest, at the least, a cover-up, and at most, complicity by insiders.[1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8]

They analyze evidence from the attacks, discuss different theories about how the attacks happened and call for a new investigation into the attacks.[9][10][11][12][13][14][15] Some of the organizations assert that there is evidence that individuals within the United States government may have been either responsible for or knowingly complicit in the September 11 attacks. Motives suggested by the movement include the use of the attacks as a pretext to start wars in Afghanistan and Iraq and to create opportunities to curtail civil liberties.[2][16]

 

[Sakal Gharelu Ustad]

DFI should dedicate a special section for discussing conspiracy theories!

 

[W.G.Ewald]

DFI should dedicate a special section for discussing conspiracy theories!

http://defenceforumindia.com/forum/members-corner/49083-conspiracy-theories-thread.html

 

[LurkerBaba]

Thread closed

 

[Singh]