Fresh atrocities on Hindu families in Bangladesh

[Galaxy]

I have already posted this news.

http://defenceforumindia.com/asia-p...esh-atrocities-hindu-families-bangladesh.html

 

[A.V.]

thread to be merged

 

[Tronic]

that is because i am a hindu and it hurts me and we are a Hindu majority nation it should be our duty to protect and bring Hindus Shikhs home to india their ancestral motherland as for the muslims they can come to if they like

India is not the entire ancestral motherland of the Sikhs, Punjab, which was put on a platter and handed to Pakistan by Nehru, is.

 

[KS]

India is not the entire ancestral motherland of the Sikhs, Punjab, which was put on a platter and handed to Pakistan by Nehru, is.

It now is, I hope so especially after Partition.

 

[Ray]

Who are the actual chaps involved in the atrocities?

The Muslim fundoos, Biharis who were scorned and rejected by Pakistan or other Bangladeshis?

Whoever they are, they are real tuchkoos.

 

[agentperry]

when India can raise voice against the atrocities on Sikhs in pakistan, violence on Indians in austrash and sailors in horn of africa, then im surprised to see no lip service on this issue.
internationally, despite all effort by seculars, India is seen as home to hindus and sikhs, as its only place where they are protected well and we see them in largest no (worldwide) and they expect us to raise voice against the atrocities on religious groups outside India.
if we dont then it will send signal to the world that this nation is not serious about any issue and is a weak or soft states( irrespective of large forces). so as to atleast maintain international repo we should raise voice.

 

[natarajan]

^^^^
Even here ,there wont be any response

 

[S.A.T.A]

India will not have the moral conviction for speaking for Hindus anywhere until it speaks for the Hindus in India.How can a so called secular nation speak for any ethnic group in another officially secular country.A Hindu state would be a different matter.

 

[Tshering22]

India will not have the moral conviction for speaking for Hindus anywhere until it speaks for the Hindus in India.How can a so called secular nation speak for any ethnic group in another officially secular country.A Hindu state would be a different matter.

India is NOT a secular country; it is a votebank dysfunctional kleptocracy. Nepal was a Hindu state and Buddhists were living safely as well there until the bloody communists took over and started screwing with followers of Dharmic paths. Now see where Nepal is; Sub-continent's secularism does a lot of shyte to any country and India and Nepal are the best examples of what can happen when secularists of these countries come to power.

The reason why no response is coming because protecting a mainstream Hindu is communal while giving protection status of migration to even Pakistani Christians is secular. You see this crap now?

 

[Ray]

Its called being an idiot. So why care about only Hindu's in Bangladesh, I am sure there are lot of Shia/Ahamadi muslims oppressed in Bangladesh. Why not them?

Interestingly, there are very few Shias in Bangladesh.

If there were, then they would have been sorted out.