Failed Terrorist State of Pakistan: Idiotic Musings

Project Dharma

meh
Senior Member
Joined
Oct 4, 2016
Messages
4,836
Likes
10,862
Country flag
Those guys in south are home schooled weirdos, Alex Jones type.

Here we are talking about their official Gor-Mint approved text books. This is what students learn in school's science class.
Yes I understand, that is why I said (see bolded)

This could sadly be American curriculum as well if the hardcore Christians had their way.
 

vinuzap

Regular Member
Joined
Nov 15, 2016
Messages
509
Likes
693
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/wires/ap/article-4533748/WHO-assembly-set-choose-chief-3-candidates.html

GENEVA (AP) - Africa, where viruses such as HIV, Ebola and Zika emerged, has its first chief of the U.N. health agency.

Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus, a former Ethiopian minister of health, was elected Tuesday as the next director-general of the World Health Organization, becoming the first non-medical doctor and the first African tapped to lead an influential agency that helps set health priorities worldwide.

Health ministers and other senior envoys to WHO's annual World Health Assembly elected Tedros over Dr. David Nabarro of Britain, a U.N. veteran, in a third and final round of voting. Tedros received 133 votes to Nabarro's 50, with two abstentions. The third candidate, Pakistan's Dr. Sania Nishtar, was eliminated in the first round of voting.



 

IndianHawk

Senior Member
Joined
Sep 24, 2016
Messages
9,058
Likes
37,672
Country flag
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/wires/ap/article-4533748/WHO-assembly-set-choose-chief-3-candidates.html

GENEVA (AP) - Africa, where viruses such as HIV, Ebola and Zika emerged, has its first chief of the U.N. health agency.

Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus, a former Ethiopian minister of health, was elected Tuesday as the next director-general of the World Health Organization, becoming the first non-medical doctor and the first African tapped to lead an influential agency that helps set health priorities worldwide.

Health ministers and other senior envoys to WHO's annual World Health Assembly elected Tedros over Dr. David Nabarro of Britain, a U.N. veteran, in a third and final round of voting. Tedros received 133 votes to Nabarro's 50, with two abstentions. The third candidate, Pakistan's Dr. Sania Nishtar, was eliminated in the first round of voting.



Porkies can't lead anything. You could rather put a goat on the job and she will perform batter than porki pigs.
 

lcafanboy

Senior Member
Joined
Mar 24, 2013
Messages
5,810
Likes
37,270
Country flag
Humour: Pak army invites applications for the post of Video Producers
Vikram Bhalla| May 26, 2017, 11.51 AM IST



A Pakistani soldier ready to attack India.

Rawalpindi. In a bid to produce more high quality videos that world takes seriously, Pak army, fresh from embarrassment of being exposed over their fake videos, has invited applications for the post of video producers.

Pakistan will soon start a mulkwide recruitment drive. These ‘non-state video producers’ are set to give a major fillip to Pak’s defense armory. The budget for the recruitment has been sanctioned by diverting funds that were to be used to for poverty alleviation and education.

“We are very serious about giving Mudy and india a befitting reply. Going forward all military operations will be suspended or outsourced to terror outfits like LeT, JeM and our army’s entire focus and energies would be channelized on HD quality video production to counter india,” said Pakistan army chief Qamar Javed Bajwa.

If sources are to be believed Pakistan army realized that there were lots of loopholes in the C-grade videos that showed them destroying Indian posts.

After the professional video team is on board, Pak intends to shoot, produce and edit world class videos showing them defeating India in all wars that happened so far. They will also show how they captured 93000 Indian POW during 1971 Bangladesh liberation war.

“Not just this, we will be able to produce videos showing how we defeated India in all world cup matches and how India has been fooling world all along by peddling lies and propaganda through fake match videos,” said a Pak army officer cum part time terrorist.

Pakistan army will then monetize these videos by releasing them as feature films under fantasy and comedy genre. They will use the money thus generated to make bombs.

However if the videos thus produced still fail to gain trust of Pak’s awaam, their army will then request its ally China to create a cheap copy of Kashmir that Pakistan will claim to have captured.

http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/...t-of-video-producers/articleshow/58853249.cms
 

sorcerer

Senior Member
Joined
Apr 13, 2013
Messages
26,919
Likes
98,471
Country flag
Pakistan suffers $123.1 bn losses due to self-grown Islamic Terrorism

Since Pakistan became frontline ally of the United States in war on terror 16 years back after 9/11, the economy of this developing country suffered a whopping $123.1 billion cost on account of loss of lives, economic opportunities and damage to the country’s infrastructure.

As Pakistan’s current GDP volume is $304 billion, this huge loss is 41 percent of the country’s total economy size. This indicates that two-fifth of the economy not only went in the air but it also further damaged the economic growth of the country.

According to the Pakistan Economic Survey 2016/17, this huge number has been worked out after thoroughly investigating the effects of war on the national economy for the last 16 years. The war on terror has been drastically affecting our economy, exports, physical infrastructure, tax collection and investment and our social fabric. Since the insurgency started in Pakistan following the US invasion of Afghanistan, more than 60,000 Pakistani civilians, security forces personnel and women and children have been killed in gun, bomb and suicide attacks. Besides, thousands of others have been seriously injured or handicapped and are unable to win bread for their children which ultimately also created other social issues in the society.

On average, every year Pakistan suffered losses of $7.7 billion -- more than the country’s total expenditures on education, health and other social safety schemes.

In recent years, security situation has improved to some extent, largely due to successful counterterrorism efforts of the government under the framework of the comprehensive National Action Plan, backed by an extensive and highly effective counterterrorism operation Zarb-e- Azb by the armed forces, and actions by other security and law enforcement agencies and intelligence-based operations across the country. After successful completion of Zarb-e-Azb, a country-wide operation Raddul Fasaad has been launched for eliminating any residual or latent threats.

After the US invasion of Afghanistan, Pakistan saw a huge influx of Afghan refugees as one of the main host countries. There was a sudden rise in the number and scale of terrorist attacks in the country. The cumulative impact of these developments adversely impacted the overall growth rate in all major sectors of the economy. Normal economic and trading activities were disrupted, resulting in higher costs of doing business and significant delays in meeting the export orders around the globe. As a result, Pakistani products gradually lost their market share to their competitors. Economic growth could not pick up as planned.

In fiscal year 2017, $3.88 billion (Rs407.2 billion) losses to economy were recorded, sharply lower than $6.49 billion in fiscal year 2016, Pakistan’s Economic Survey revealed.

The survey gives further figures, saying that in 2001/02, the cost was $2.67 billion, 2002/03 $2.75 billion, 2003/04 $2.93 billion, 2004/05 $3.4 billion, 2005/06 $3.99 billion, 2006/07 $4.67 billion, 2007/08 $6.94 billion, 2008/09 $9.18 billion, 2009/10 $13.56 billion, 2010/11 $23.77 billion, 2011/12 $11.98 billion, 2012/13 $9.97 billion, 2013/14 $7.7 billion, 2014/15 $9.24 billion and in 2015/16 it was $6.49 billion dollars.

Pakistan continues to be a serious victim of terrorism, including foreign-sponsored terrorism from our immediate neighbourhood. A substantial portion of precious national resources, both men and material, have been diverted to address the emerging security challenges and to repair damaged infrastructure during the last several years. In addition to economic losses, cross-border terrorism in Pakistan has also been responsible for untold human sufferings due to indiscriminate, brutal terrorist attacks against civilian population


https://www.thenews.com.pk/print/206709-Pakistan-suffers-1231-bn-losses-in-terror-war
 

IndianHawk

Senior Member
Joined
Sep 24, 2016
Messages
9,058
Likes
37,672
Country flag
Pakistan suffers $123.1 bn losses due to self-grown Islamic Terrorism

Since Pakistan became frontline ally of the United States in war on terror 16 years back after 9/11, the economy of this developing country suffered a whopping $123.1 billion cost on account of loss of lives, economic opportunities and damage to the country’s infrastructure.

As Pakistan’s current GDP volume is $304 billion, this huge loss is 41 percent of the country’s total economy size. This indicates that two-fifth of the economy not only went in the air but it also further damaged the economic growth of the country.

According to the Pakistan Economic Survey 2016/17, this huge number has been worked out after thoroughly investigating the effects of war on the national economy for the last 16 years. The war on terror has been drastically affecting our economy, exports, physical infrastructure, tax collection and investment and our social fabric. Since the insurgency started in Pakistan following the US invasion of Afghanistan, more than 60,000 Pakistani civilians, security forces personnel and women and children have been killed in gun, bomb and suicide attacks. Besides, thousands of others have been seriously injured or handicapped and are unable to win bread for their children which ultimately also created other social issues in the society.

On average, every year Pakistan suffered losses of $7.7 billion -- more than the country’s total expenditures on education, health and other social safety schemes.

In recent years, security situation has improved to some extent, largely due to successful counterterrorism efforts of the government under the framework of the comprehensive National Action Plan, backed by an extensive and highly effective counterterrorism operation Zarb-e- Azb by the armed forces, and actions by other security and law enforcement agencies and intelligence-based operations across the country. After successful completion of Zarb-e-Azb, a country-wide operation Raddul Fasaad has been launched for eliminating any residual or latent threats.

After the US invasion of Afghanistan, Pakistan saw a huge influx of Afghan refugees as one of the main host countries. There was a sudden rise in the number and scale of terrorist attacks in the country. The cumulative impact of these developments adversely impacted the overall growth rate in all major sectors of the economy. Normal economic and trading activities were disrupted, resulting in higher costs of doing business and significant delays in meeting the export orders around the globe. As a result, Pakistani products gradually lost their market share to their competitors. Economic growth could not pick up as planned.

In fiscal year 2017, $3.88 billion (Rs407.2 billion) losses to economy were recorded, sharply lower than $6.49 billion in fiscal year 2016, Pakistan’s Economic Survey revealed.

The survey gives further figures, saying that in 2001/02, the cost was $2.67 billion, 2002/03 $2.75 billion, 2003/04 $2.93 billion, 2004/05 $3.4 billion, 2005/06 $3.99 billion, 2006/07 $4.67 billion, 2007/08 $6.94 billion, 2008/09 $9.18 billion, 2009/10 $13.56 billion, 2010/11 $23.77 billion, 2011/12 $11.98 billion, 2012/13 $9.97 billion, 2013/14 $7.7 billion, 2014/15 $9.24 billion and in 2015/16 it was $6.49 billion dollars.

Pakistan continues to be a serious victim of terrorism, including foreign-sponsored terrorism from our immediate neighbourhood. A substantial portion of precious national resources, both men and material, have been diverted to address the emerging security challenges and to repair damaged infrastructure during the last several years. In addition to economic losses, cross-border terrorism in Pakistan has also been responsible for untold human sufferings due to indiscriminate, brutal terrorist attacks against civilian population


https://www.thenews.com.pk/print/206709-Pakistan-suffers-1231-bn-losses-in-terror-war
Pakis keep doing these brainless calculation to show that they are the victims of terrorism.123 billion dollars. Meanwhile hapig saeed collecting 5 rupees in Islamic rallies all over pakistan.

Whatever pathetic infrastructure in pak got destroyed by infighting of Taliban others could not of value of more than few million dollars.
 

Mikesingh

Professional
Joined
Sep 7, 2015
Messages
7,353
Likes
30,450
Country flag
*Silly musing on*

Do you guys know the best way for peace with Porkistan?

The pussy Islamic Army of Porkistan is a commercial venture. According to Ayesha Siddiqa, a Pakistani journalist in her book, Military Inc.: Inside Pakistan's Military Economy, the Pork Army has business interests in Pak running bakeries to malls to logistics worth over $15 billion - more than the total Sino Pak trade!!! The color of money is their be-all and end-all. Nothing else really matters to their Generals as much. So, suppose we agree to invest a couple of billion dollars in their ventures, don't you think they'll welcome this with open arms? They'll probably even start grovelling at our feet for more! If they do it will result in peace forever and forever, Amen! :)

*Silly musing off*


 

mayfair

Senior Member
Joined
Feb 26, 2010
Messages
6,032
Likes
13,109
^^ Actually no.

Let me explain. Napaaki existence is solely centred on hatred of India. Napaaki fauj even more so.

With the Indian bogey, they can happily hold everything in Shitistan to ransom while merrily expanding their footprint into every sphere.

The fauji foundation bullshit came much later. Once the Napaaki fauj had an iron group over the state, they realised that they need not contend with this much. They had the real estate and now they wanted to milk it as much as possible- and thereby the Napaaki fauji foundation.

The foundation is rapidly gaining foothold in Shitland economy because Napaaki fauj is the biggest dog in that shithole. They use this to monopolise, to edge out competitors, to skim the cream off the top, leaving the crumbs to others.

They'll never ever sue for peace with India because this means that people will start questioning the rationale for the big dog to be so big. Eternal hatred with India is their sole motive, their only religion and their only mantra.

Even if suppose, we were stupid enough to invest there, Napaakis will cheerfully take our money and stick a knife in at the first opportunity, while curing and mocking the stupid Hindu bania. Eventually, in their warped mind, this will morph into a convoluted understanding that Hindus are providing jaziya.

The hatred will never go till the Napaaki fauj exists.
 

thethinker

Senior Member
Joined
Dec 18, 2013
Messages
2,808
Likes
6,489
Country flag


Sent from my ASUS_Z00LD using Tapatalk
This seems to be a collective psyche of Pakis to photoshop whatever they need but know that they can never get.

One Paki even went to extent of photoshopping Virat Kohli as a Paki player






Their logic seems to be : If you can't get what you need in real life, photoshop it. :lol:

That also explains why the Mugalistan maps of India which they like to circulate amongst their ilk.
 

OneGrimPilgrim

Senior Member
Joined
May 18, 2015
Messages
5,243
Likes
6,810
Country flag
(just something i came across)
Hey Sahir Lodhi, defending Jinnah doesn't justify belittling women on TV (vid on linked-page)



We have learned to expect an endless array of melodramatic, cringeworthy moments on most Ramazan transmissions. However, the latest bout of jingoism from Sahir Lodhi was a vision none of our eyes were prepared for.

Dr Saba Rizwan, a recent participant on Sahir Lodhi’s show, was required to speak against a certain topic. From the podium, she delivered an impassioned speech concerning women’s issues in Pakistan, ranging from harassment to honour killing.

Lodhi listened to the speech attentively with an unmistakable look of seething antipathy. One may easily interpret this as the expression of a predator waiting to pounce on its prey at an opportune moment, giving the audience a fair sense of what might happen at the end well before it actually happened.

Dr. Rizwan spoke eloquently about the injustices women commonly face in Pakistan, eventually reaching to a point where she rhetorically called upon Jinnah to witness the dire state of his nation.

"Come Quaid-e-Azam, look at your Pakistan," she said.

At that point, Mr. Lodhi interrupted the speech, and launched an embarrassingly boisterous, utterly irrelevant, and probably scripted monologue about Jinnah’s greatness.

Lodhi began by chiding the audience for clapping at Rizwan’s speech reference to the Quaid. “Why did you clap?” he demanded from a confused audience, before accusing the participant of insulting Jinnah.

With the explosive energy of Sunny Deol in a courtroom scene, Sahir Lodhi broke off into a dramatic speech about the speaker’s audacity to criticize Jinnah, and the audience’s temerity to applaud said criticism.

"Who dares to call out the man who gave us Pakistan? [...] If we don't make queues, we're responsible for that. Will we blame Quaid-e-Azam for it? If we give bribes, we're responsible for that. Will we blame Quaid-e-Azam for it? Brothers killing brothers, we do it. Will we blame Quaid-e-Azam for it? [...] How long will we keeping blaming the Quaid for our shortcomings? Are we that ungrateful? So think before you clap."

It is unlikely that Mr. Lodhi simply failed to comprehend the point of Rizwan’s poetic speech. She was not insulting Jinnah or 'blaming' him, but simply making an obvious point about our nation’s tragic departure from what is widely believed to be Jinnah’s own vision of Pakistan. Jinnah wanted us to be more than what we are at present - an understandable and uncontroversial sentiment.


The eyesore of an incident, at the intersection of misogyny and jingoism, ended with the male host talking paternalistically to four women participants standing quietly in line; referring to them repeatedly as ‘kids’, and tutoring them on the need to stay positive and respect our country.

The participants understood it. The audience understood it. The bouquet of fake flowers in the background understood it. It is highly improbably that Mr. Lodhi didn’t get it, but that did not keep him from indulging in some old-fashioned, patriotic point-scoring, in which he regurgitated praise-worthy facts about Jinnah straight from a Pak Studies textbook.

Dr. Saba Rizwan seemed mortified by the turn of events, though it is unclear whether she felt embarrassed for herself, or for Mr. Lodhi and his melodramatic address. Nevertheless, she stood silently, and endured this undeserved insolence with grace. I do not know for certain if the outburst was scripted or if the participant had prior knowledge of this nauseating performance heading her way, but she appeared acutely uncomfortable.

The elderly professor at the panel, building up on Lodhi’s pseudo-patriotic energy, also criticized the woman participant for “insulting” Jinnah in an otherwise admirable speech.

The eyesore of an incident, at the intersection of misogyny and jingoism, ended with the male host talking paternalistically to four women participants standing quietly in line; referring to them repeatedly as ‘kids’, and tutoring them on the need to stay positive and respect our country.

To sum up, we witnessed a jingoistic male host tone-policing female participants on live television, treating an articulate medical doctor like a 9-year old girl with behavioral problems, and scolding her for a sin she hadn’t committed. A more poignant image of the unenviable state of women in our country, could not have been captured on tape.

Why can a woman not speak for two and a half minutes about women’s issues without a brick of male opinion crashing through her window to address the “more important” stuff? No amount of irrelevant, melodramatic Jinnah-mongering conceals the blunt sexism in this video. It was a transparent, self-serving retort to someone who had never contested the greatness of Quaid-e-Azam in the first place.

Why do we always insist on invoking nationalism, security, religion, and class politics whenever it’s a woman’s turn at the microphone? Why can’t a female student from BNU talk about period-shaming without being accused of undermining class struggles? Why can a woman not speak for two and a half minutes about women’s issues without a brick of male opinion crashing through her window to address the “more important” stuff?

No amount of irrelevant, melodramatic Jinnah-mongering conceals the blunt sexism in this video. It was a transparent, self-serving retort to someone who had never contested the greatness of Quaid-e-Azam in the first place.

Patriotism isn’t simply about cracking a coconut at the altar of a national hero. It’s about caring for the welfare of the people of your country; the same people that Sahir Lodhi may attempt to silence instead.
 

Latest Replies

Global Defence

New threads

Articles

Top