End of Pakistan's Baloch Insurgency?

Discussion in 'Balochistan - Freedom Struggle' started by IBSA, Nov 19, 2014.

  1. IBSA

    IBSA Regular Member

    Joined:
    Nov 16, 2011
    Messages:
    926
    Likes Received:
    832
    Location:
    São Paulo
    The End of Pakistan's Baloch Insurgency?

    Since its beginning in 2004, the Pakistan's Baloch insurgency is caught up in the worst infighting ever known to the general public. Different left-wing underground armed groups that had been fighting Islamabad for a free Baloch homeland have now started to attack each other's camps. If the infighting exacerbates, Islamabad will have solid reasons to rejoice the end of one of the two deadly insurgencies it has been facing for nearly a decade (the other being the Taliban insurgency).

    Overshadowed by the deadlier Taliban insurgency, the Baloch resistance did not draw ample attention in the national media but it was certainly a matter of deep concern for the past three consecutive governments. The Baloch insurgents had attacked almost all prime installations of the Pakistani government, including the military cantonment in Quetta, Balochistan's capital; important government buildings and killed senior government officials.

    The Baloch had confronted the Pakistani state on at least four occasions in the past. The Pakistani government adopted numerous approaches to undermine the Baloch resistance but none of these approaches fully worked until infighting crept the ranks of the Baloch. In the past, Islamabad carried out military operations, bought the loyalties of rival tribal chiefs or empowered the so-called moderate leadership of the Baloch and also sponsored religious extremist groups in order to counter the Baloch nationalists. All such policies failed to completely uproot the resistance in the mineral-rich region. There has only been only one antidote to the Baloch movement: Infighting.

    On November 3, the United Baloch Army, an underground armed organization, said the Baloch Liberation Army (BLA), another armed group, had killed one of it its commanders, Ali Sher, and detained four of its 'freedom fighters'. This was an unprecedented development as the Baloch insurgents had never attacked each other in the past although half a dozen armed groups have been operating separately for a decade to challenge the Pakistani state. The killing of a fellow Baloch commander comes in the midst of a call two days earlier by two most important pro-independence Baloch political organizations, the Baloch National Movement (BNM) and the Baloch Students Organization (BSO) that appealed to all the armed groups to refrain from fighting each other. The BNM and the BSO provide support for the call for a free Baloch land among the people through political rallies and distribution of literature among the masses. In the process of their overt public support for the idea of a free Balochistan, the BNM and the BSO have lost the largest number of political activists in Pakistan's brutal crackdown against the Baloch political activists.

    Unlike the past resistance movements, the ongoing Baloch resistance had created serious challenges for Pakistan for at least four reasons.

    First, it lasted longer than any of the past resistance moment. Second, the armed struggle reached the breadth and width of Balochistan. It was expanded from rural mountainous regions to the city centers. Third, the movement involved Baloch women and children who supported the armed groups through regular protest rallies. Fourth, the Baloch resistance drew more international attention than ever before. In 2012, the U.S. Congress convened a hearing on Balochistan and supported the demand for a free Baloch land. The conflict in Balochistan has drastically influenced India-Pakistan relations as Islamabad has accused New Delhi of supporting the insurgency in Balochistan.

    What suddenly caused the dramatic fall of a movement that was otherwise capable of giving Islamabad a serious headache?

    While the state-sponsored killing of a top Baloch tribal leader, Nawab Akbar Bugti in August 2006, had escalated the insurgency, the natural death of another veteran nationalist leader, Nawab Khair Bakhsh Marri in June 2014 has caused the dramatic decline of the Baloch separatist movement.

    Widely perceived as the godfather of the Baloch armed movement, Mr. Marri was a Marxist who ardently advocated the idea of a free Balochistan. I met and interviewed him at his Karachi residence in 2008. He was old and frail but said there was no way the Baloch could coexist with Pakistan. Marri was believed to be running the Baloch armed group, the Baloch Liberation Army. Islamabad had already pitted his pro-Pakistan tribal rivals against him to weaken his political position. After his death, differences broke out even among the Marri brothers on the question as to who would succeed the senior Marri. It is believed that the BLA and the UBA are loyal to two warring Marri brothers.

    Currently, there is persistent tension between the two groups as to who can join and lead these organizations. In the past, the Baloch armed groups drew their manpower from the largest Baloch tribe, the Marris, only. There has been disequilibrium in the recent past as non-tribal activists from other parts of Balochistan have also joined these groups. Differences exist on how much to trust the newcomers and how much authority they should be granted. Besides the UBA, the BLA has also been criticized by another armed organization, the Lashkar-e-Balochistan, which, a recent statement published in Urdu language newspaper Daily Tawar, said the BLA was more active on social media than the actual battleground. The BLA is the oldest and the most dangerous among all Baloch groups operating in Balochistan.

    Meanwhile, on another front, Baloch armed fighters struggling inside Balochistan have come out against those Baloch politicians who are currently living in exile. Those risking their lives in the battlefield in Balochistan against Pakistani forces feel somewhat betrayed that some other leaders are enjoying 'comfortable' lives in western capitals and capitalizing on their struggle. An awkward series of public allegations was seen in Balochistan's local Urdu newspapers last week between Dr. Allah Nazar, the supposed head of another Baloch armed group, the Baloch Liberation Front (BLF) and the Khan of Kalat Mir Suleman Dawood, a daydreamer who perceives himself as the future king of a free Balochistan. Mr. Dawood, living in exile in the United Kingdom, has been instrumental in reaching out to American and western parliamentarians to get their support for a free Balochistan.

    The armed resistance gained enormous public support in mid-2000s because of Pakistan's excessive use of force against the Baloch masses. But the insurgents failed to utilize this time to come on one single platform to put forward their demands. More and more armed groups emerged among the Baloch which made it almost impossible for them to properly coordinate with each other. The armed groups alienated the fellow moderate Baloch political parties by questioning their patriotism and commitment to the 'national cause'. Human rights groups criticized the Baloch armed groups for killing numerous non-Baloch citizens under the allegations of spying for the Pakistani government while ordinary Baloch citizens also became victim of their attacks on similar unsubstantiated allegations.

    After one year of continued fighting, the Baloch insurgents appear frustrated with the lack of international support for their movement. A decade later, even not a single country supports the free Balochistan movement. The Baloch fighters seem jaded with how moderate political parties, such as the ruling National Party of Dr. Malik Baloch, the chief minister of Balochistan, capitalize on their hard work and gain political power. Islamabad's counter-insurgency policy can hardly be credited for pushing the Baloch insurgents to this level. Frustration, suspicion, infighting and division are the common features of the end of a guerrilla fight. Perhaps that time has come in Balochistan.

    The End of Pakistan's Baloch Insurgency? | Malik Siraj Akbar
     
  2.  
  3. Hari Sud

    Hari Sud Senior Member Senior Member

    Joined:
    Mar 31, 2012
    Messages:
    1,054
    Likes Received:
    862
    Location:
    Ontario
    Sorry Baloch, the timing is wrong. The great champion of freedom and self determination all over the world, the US has befriend Pakistan with the sole purpose of getting its troops and hardware out of Afghanistan using Karachi port. This leaves no room for Baloch tribesmen voice to be heard.

    Any Indian support was consistently stymied by the likes of Robin Raphael at the State Department.

    The cause may be lost for now but hold on to your hardware, there will be time again. As the situation is drifting towards a confrontation, India and Pakistan will fight another war. One cannot say that it is a nuclear war. Either way the nuclear or conventional, Pakistan will be cut to size for a long time to come. That will be your chance. At that time, no power like US would be able to stop you from independence.
     
    Kshatriya87, TrueSpirit1 and maomao like this.
  4. Kashif

    Kashif Regular Member

    Joined:
    Nov 14, 2014
    Messages:
    27
    Likes Received:
    0
    War is not a solution, it will destroy both countries badly even its horrible impact on the region can not be ruled out, India should stop supporting BLA for their own good.
     
  5. maomao

    maomao Veteran Hunter of Maleecha Senior Member

    Joined:
    Apr 7, 2010
    Messages:
    4,498
    Likes Received:
    4,145
    How can you say that India supports BLA? If India would have supported BLA then Balochistan would have been an independent state by now!
     
    Kshatriya87 likes this.
  6. Ray

    Ray The Chairman Defence Professionals Moderator

    Joined:
    Apr 17, 2009
    Messages:
    43,117
    Likes Received:
    23,545
    Location:
    Somewhere
    War is not the answer and there is no requirement to do so.

    The Baloch people are a unique ethno-linguistic group spread between Afghanistan, Iran, and Pakistan. Throughout history they have been the victims of marginalization within their respective countries. They have an inbuilt anger at being pushed to the periphery of nationalism within their countries.

    [​IMG]

    If one examines the conflict drivers in Pakistani Balochistan, it is evident that a complete cessation of the conflict is unlikely because the drivers of the conflict includes tribal divisions, the Baloch-Pashtun divide, marginalization by Punjabi interests, and economic oppression.

    The most powerful sore points are the domination of the Punjabi interests and economic oppression.

    Internationally, Balochistan is important to the power strategy of the global players.

    For the United States, Balochistan, an area that encompasses western Pakistan, eastern Iran, and a piece of southern Afghanistan, is critical to the maintenance of US hegemony in the Middle East and Central and South Asia.

    For China, Balochistan is a region necessary for its own economic and political evolution into a world superpower.

    Therefore, Balochistan becomes central to the development of geopolitical power in the 21st Century.

    Further, Balochistan is also central to the development and export of energy from Central Asia & it access to the Indian Ocean plays a pivotal role for access to the Central Asian market and energy supply. This factor straps in other nations which may not be aspiring global superpower, but nonetheless are regional major players.

    Now that the US has withdrawn from Afghanistan, it does not require Pakistan. That factor has dawned on Pakistan and that is why the Pakistan Army Chief is in the US knocking at Obama's door wailing that India's aggressive stand is upsetting Pakistan's attempt to curb the terrorists in NWFP, whereby keeping the bogey of Taliban and AQ alive so that Pakistan still is given the alms that she was getting when the US required Pakistan as a supply conduit for its troops in Afghanistan.

    In an article published by the Qatari English-language newspaper The Peninsula, the author cited credible sources as saying that “the CIA is indulging in heavy recruitment of local people as agents (each being paid $500 a month)”.
    There is no doubt that it makes strategic sense for the US to fund and fan the Jundullah so that it can squeeze Iran from both sides - Iraq and from Balochistan and at the same time sabotage and disrupt the Chinese from having a free run to build and then operate the link from Gwadar to Xinjiang.

    Given the fluid geopolitical and geostrategic equations of the world, it would be too early to write off Balochistan insurgency.

    Writing off is merely a pipedream of virulent day dreamers.

    India does not have to go to war with Pakistan because there are greater players in this mug's game to allow India to be a spectator as the drama unfolds to India's advantage.
     
    TrueSpirit1 and maomao like this.
  7. Ray

    Ray The Chairman Defence Professionals Moderator

    Joined:
    Apr 17, 2009
    Messages:
    43,117
    Likes Received:
    23,545
    Location:
    Somewhere
    That is the usual from Pakistan.

    India is always to blame, including for the creation of Pakistan.

    It maybe worth noting that Bolchistan got independence from British on 11th August 1947.

    But in 1948, Pakistan annexed the province.

    Media reports indicate that within 24 hours of the declaration of Independence in 1947, the Khan of Kalat formed Balochistan's House of Commons and the House of Lords. On 16th December 1947 Khan of Kalat called a meeting of both houses of Balochistan to discuss the possibility of joining Pakistan. Reports suggest members from both Houses rejected the idea of joining Pakistan. But after that Pakistan invaded Balochistan and took control by imprisoning Khan of Kalat and his family members within the palace. This claim is however disputed by the Pakistani establishment who claim Balochistan consisted of four provinces of Makran, LasBela, Kharan and Kalat. Among them all were willing to join Pakistan except Kalat, but due to a past treaty it was incorporated into the country.

     
    Last edited by a moderator: May 10, 2015
  8. maomao

    maomao Veteran Hunter of Maleecha Senior Member

    Joined:
    Apr 7, 2010
    Messages:
    4,498
    Likes Received:
    4,145
    @Ray What I know is that initially even Jinna accepted Balochistan (Kalat) as an independent state, however suddenly after 6-9 months they sent their armies to annex it! Balochistan was independent even before pakistan was created is a fact!
     
    Last edited by a moderator: May 10, 2015
    sorcerer likes this.
  9. Ray

    Ray The Chairman Defence Professionals Moderator

    Joined:
    Apr 17, 2009
    Messages:
    43,117
    Likes Received:
    23,545
    Location:
    Somewhere
    Have a look at this letter from Jinnah written on 2 Feb 1948.
    https://www.flickr.com/photos/drymountains/6812725249/

     
    Last edited by a moderator: May 10, 2015
  10. maomao

    maomao Veteran Hunter of Maleecha Senior Member

    Joined:
    Apr 7, 2010
    Messages:
    4,498
    Likes Received:
    4,145
    @Ray Hmmm what I had read was initially Jinnah had accepted Kalat as an independent state but latter detracted and attacked it. The letter shows he was negotiating accession before the attack! Usually statesmen do negotiate first but the attack was sudden and swift!

    Few interesting current affairs website on Balochistan:

    Baloch Warna: http://balochwarna.com/about-us/

    BRA: http://balochrepublicanarmy.com/category/videos/

    Baloch Sarmachar: https://baluchsarmachar.wordpress.com/tag/baloch-sarmachar/

    Baloch Liberation Voice: http://balochliberationvoice.com/
     
    Last edited by a moderator: May 10, 2015
  11. DingDong

    DingDong Senior Member Senior Member

    Joined:
    Oct 24, 2014
    Messages:
    2,228
    Likes Received:
    3,670
    Location:
    Delhi
    India must support Baloch and Sindhi independence with all vigour. War with India will destroy Pakistan, India will take care of her losses.
     
    John Baloch and maomao like this.
  12. Peter

    Peter Senior Member Senior Member

    Joined:
    Mar 3, 2014
    Messages:
    2,218
    Likes Received:
    1,130
    Location:
    Kolkata

    Hey you Pakistani, stop being a delusional idiot.
     
    John Baloch likes this.
  13. John Baloch

    John Baloch New Member

    Joined:
    Nov 19, 2014
    Messages:
    5
    Likes Received:
    4
    Location:
    Occupied Balochistan
    BLA and UBA have some small issues Baloch Leaders are on Table regarding this matter Pakistan trying its best that baloch people fight each other but This time Baloch people know what to do.
     
    maomao likes this.
  14. Kshatriya87

    Kshatriya87 Senior Member Senior Member

    Joined:
    Feb 12, 2014
    Messages:
    4,736
    Likes Received:
    3,177
    Location:
    Mumbai
    I don't think baloch rebels will give up on their quest for independence. Fight for freedom will never end completely. It might diminish a bit. Sooner or later, balochistan is bound to get independence.
     
    John Baloch and maomao like this.

Share This Page