Don't Push Us Too Far On Kashmir: It Is Ours, Pakistan Warned US

Rage

DFI TEAM
Senior Member
Joined
Feb 23, 2009
Messages
5,419
Likes
1,001
Don't Push Us Too Far On Kashmir, It Is Ours: Pakistan Warned US



WASHINGTON – US had asked Pakistan in 2002 to end infiltration across the Line of Control in Jammu and Kashmir but was instead told not to "push it too far" on the issue with an assertion that "Kashmir should have been ours", according to declassified documents. This communication forms part of a meeting Richard Haass, the then Director of Policy Planning Staff at the US State Department, had with an unnamed Pakistani military official on October 31, 2002 to discuss US-Pak cooperation a year after the deadly 9/11 attacks in the US.

"On Kashmir, Haass stressed the importance of ending infiltration, but the Pak official warned the US not to push Pakistan too far on Kashmir," classified documents released on Monday said.

According to the document, Haass told the top official that he was pleased about the (Indian) announcement of troop pullback from the border as de-escalation would free resources to be devoted to sealing the Afghan border and counter-terrorism.

"It appeared that India wanted to renew contacts but continued infiltration was a barrier to progress," Haass said.

"The US believed that infiltration was continuing. Stopping it would help Pakistan's cause with the US and India. Infiltration hurts Pakistan's friends efforts to help it," he said, according to the documents.

The Pakistan official agreed that Kashmir was the issue "bedevilling our relations". But Pakistan's Kashmir position was "based on justice", he argued.

"Kashmir should have been ours. The Pakistani people would not agree to make the LOC (Line of Control) the international border. Kashmir had cost Musharraf a lot, as had his decision to help the CT coalition.

"Musharraf's detractors had hit him on both Kashmir and Afghanistan. India had tried to exploit the political atmosphere after 9/11," the Pak official said.

"Haass relied that he perceived an opportunity to improve the situation in and surrounding Kashmir. India seemed to realize that lack of political and economic opportunity and abuse of human rights created support for insurgency and a better context for diplomacy was now being created.

"Haas said that both improved governance and diplomacy were key to moving forward on Kashmir," the documents said.

At the same meeting, Pakistan pleaded with the US to provide it with an aerial surveillance capability.

Pakistan would have no objection to the same capability being provided to India, the Pakistani official said and proposed that it might be an excellent confidence building measure, as if the two sides could see what was happening across the border to reduce the possibility of misconstruing what the other side was doing, the documents said.


Don’t Push Us Too Far On Kashmir, It Is Ours: Pakistan Warned US | Link Newspaper
 

neo29

Senior Member
Joined
Dec 1, 2009
Messages
1,284
Likes
30
After 9/11 when Richard Armitage went to Pakistan to discuss about bases and attack plan on Taliban. When Pakis were sceptical, he just warned them that they would bomb Pakistan back to stone age. Pakistan had to comply. 2 years later when US is completely dependent on Pakistan on the Afghan war surely they will act and give such statements as US needs them. Nothing surprising.
 

Ray

The Chairman
Professional
Joined
Apr 17, 2009
Messages
43,132
Likes
23,835
Pakistan does not realise that India is being pushed too far and not them.

Further, if the West has to leave Afghanistan without some face saving, then Pakistan will be in deep trouble, China at their side or not!

Stoneage would be too recent a phenomenon that will hit Pakistan.
 

sesha_maruthi27

Senior Member
Joined
Aug 15, 2010
Messages
3,963
Likes
1,803
Country flag
When OBAMA started his campaign for the U.S. Presidential elections he stated that if he comes to power he would destroy Pakistan, which is the safe heaven for the terrorists. So, U.S. will hit Pakistan soon.:emot154:
 

neo29

Senior Member
Joined
Dec 1, 2009
Messages
1,284
Likes
30
^^^^

Are you sure Obama said that he will destroy Pakistan ??? I dont think i have ever heard that.

Yes, US may hit Pakistan but it is a very remote chance unless Pakistan does something really bad.

Is it not clear that US already knows that Pakistan and ISI are supporting Taliban and are undoing everything that the US is doing in this region, and still US does not even confront Pakistan on this issue in the open. Probably Pakistan nukes are the only thing that are stopping US from taking action against Pakistan.
 

Vinod2070

मध्यस्थ
Ambassador
Joined
Feb 22, 2009
Messages
2,557
Likes
115
Yes, Kashmir is theirs.

And Pakistan is ours. Let's see how it pans out.
 

Illusive

Senior Member
Joined
Jun 20, 2010
Messages
3,674
Likes
7,312
Country flag
If India has to go for war with Pak, then American presence might be necessary in Afghan region. India shouldn't wait for another mumbai attack, up the ante. Prolonging actions which should have been taken after 26/11 will only make India suffer. India should use guerrilla tactics, tempers are soaring because of the kashmir issue, deal with the problem unconventionally .
 

Ray

The Chairman
Professional
Joined
Apr 17, 2009
Messages
43,132
Likes
23,835
^^^^

Are you sure Obama said that he will destroy Pakistan ??? I dont think i have ever heard that.

Yes, US may hit Pakistan but it is a very remote chance unless Pakistan does something really bad.

Is it not clear that US already knows that Pakistan and ISI are supporting Taliban and are undoing everything that the US is doing in this region, and still US does not even confront Pakistan on this issue in the open. Probably Pakistan nukes are the only thing that are stopping US from taking action against Pakistan.
Armitage had said that Pakistan would be blown into the Stoneage. Not too sure about Obama, though he had mentioned something or the other about Pakistan during the Presidential Debates.

US surely would love to smack Pakistan right across the face, but it just can't do so and instead has to soft soap them about being a non Nato ally and such silly sops which means a sausage actually.

The US can't do anything but humour Pakistan because the only economical route into Afghanistan is through Pakistan.

If they upset Pakistan, the other route is through Iran and onto the Indian built highway in Afghanistan, which they cannot use since Iran is, as per the US, 'axis of evil' or the air corridor from CAR which will financially unsustainable.

So, Pakistan has to be mollycoddled by the US!
 

keshtopatel

Regular Member
Joined
Mar 7, 2010
Messages
300
Likes
3
Armitage had said that Pakistan would be blown into the Stoneage. Not too sure about Obama, though he had mentioned something or the other about Pakistan during the Presidential Debates.

US surely would love to smack Pakistan right across the face, but it just can't do so and instead has to soft soap them about being a non Nato ally and such silly sops which means a sausage actually.

The US can't do anything but humour Pakistan because the only economical route into Afghanistan is through Pakistan.

If they upset Pakistan, the other route is through Iran and onto the Indian built highway in Afghanistan, which they cannot use since Iran is, as per the US, 'axis of evil' or the air corridor from CAR which will financially unsustainable.

So, Pakistan has to be mollycoddled by the US!
Musharaf´s book "in the line of fire" wherein he has acknowledged the stone age remarks by Richard Armitage, but Obama has never said any such to the best of my knowledge.

It was US alone who enlisted Pakistan as non NATO ally.
As for mollycoddling, its been happening since six decades a la Paton tanks, saber jets, TOWs, Harpoons, F-16s, Frigates, Ghazi submarine, P-3 Orion and the list will go long - Afghanistan notwithstanding.
 

keshtopatel

Regular Member
Joined
Mar 7, 2010
Messages
300
Likes
3
^^^^

Are you sure Obama said that he will destroy Pakistan ??? I dont think i have ever heard that.

Yes, US may hit Pakistan but it is a very remote chance unless Pakistan does something really bad.

Is it not clear that US already knows that Pakistan and ISI are supporting Taliban and are undoing everything that the US is doing in this region, and still US does not even confront Pakistan on this issue in the open.
Correct!

Probably Pakistan nukes are the only thing that are stopping US from taking action against Pakistan.
Pakistan had nukes when they were delivered an ultimatum of turning them into stone-age. Musharaf said during the appearance on TV, this moment (9-11) is even more complicated than 1971.

Refresh your memories here: Are nuclear weapons safe in Pakistan? : The New Yorker
 

Daredevil

On Vacation!
Super Mod
Joined
Apr 5, 2009
Messages
11,615
Likes
5,772
When OBAMA started his campaign for the U.S. Presidential elections he stated that if he comes to power he would destroy Pakistan, which is the safe heaven for the terrorists. So, U.S. will hit Pakistan soon.:emot154:
No, Obama didn't say that. What he said was that if he become president he will allow hot pursuit of terrorists even into Pakistan, meaning he will allow ground troops to follow the fleeing Taliban into Pakistan and kill them.
 

Tshering22

Sikkimese Saber
Senior Member
Joined
Aug 20, 2010
Messages
7,869
Likes
23,259
Country flag
Don't Push Us Too Far On Kashmir, It Is Ours: Pakistan Warned US

[/url]
HAHAAHAHAHAHAA! Nice joke! US should have asked "Or what are you gonna do? Blow yourself up?" :emot15:
 

ajtr

Tihar Jail
Banned
Joined
Oct 2, 2009
Messages
12,038
Likes
723
pakistan warned usa....lol..............rather reality is this..................:emot15:


 

ajtr

Tihar Jail
Banned
Joined
Oct 2, 2009
Messages
12,038
Likes
723
If India has to go for war with Pak, then American presence might be necessary in Afghan region. India shouldn't wait for another mumbai attack, up the ante. Prolonging actions which should have been taken after 26/11 will only make India suffer. India should use guerrilla tactics, tempers are soaring because of the kashmir issue, deal with the problem unconventionally .
Wrong....Rather it is due to american presence in Afghanistan and pakistan india didnt attack pakistan twice in 2002 and 2008 even in the face of maximum provocation. American presence has given pakistan a kind of insurance against indian attack. same is happening in POK.Pakistan is slowly seceding gilgit-baltistan to china thereby securing it from any future indian attack.Now best option for india in case of war, lies in attacking balochistan through sea.but that window too is getting closed with the chinese presence there.
 

Latest Replies

Global Defence

New threads

Articles

Top