For a military professional you have really poor views about the geografic challenges for east and west Pakistan. I won't waste time arguing with you. So go chest thumping with your looli langri victory of 1971, I'm sure DFI'ans will continue to buy your poor rants.
I have at least some knowledge of English spelling. It is 'geographic' and not 'geografic'.
If geographic distance prevented defence, then the Pakistan Military if it was incompetent to defend it, it should not given it up on it own long back.
The US has territories flung at greater distance than what Pak had. Have they abandoned their right and capability to defend them?
No. They have the will and strength to defend and not day dream like Pakistan on a shoestring.
What a pathetic argument you give!
Ab pachatae hoot kya jab chidiya chug gayi khet.
English : Why repent now, when the bird has already eaten the crop.
Meaning : There's no use of repentance after time of action passes.
Let us walk you through your own history of which you are totally ignorant about. Chest thumping like Nikita, Tarzan's monkey, will not do.
Kreegah!
Bandolo! is good for the comic books alone.
The role of the Pakistan armed forces in East Pakistan was to hold out until Pakistan defeated India in the west (in case of war).
Niazi, Lt. Gen. A.A.K. The Betrayal of East Pakistan. p. 128.
Now that is high hopes to start with. Flawed assumption on the stupid idea that One Paki is worth 10 Indians!
The armed forces (particularly the Pakistan Army), had drawn up a plan to defend Dhaka by concentrating all their forces along the Dhaka Bowl (the area surrounded by the rivers Jamuna, Padma and Meghna).
[ Ali, Maj. Gen. Rao Farman. How Pakistan Got Divided. pp. 118–119.}
And the biggest mistake they did was launch Operation Searchlight and Operation Barisal. Another indication how the West Pakistanis hated Bengalis and were ready to annihilate them and rape their womenfolk. Pakistanis are stupid. They could hardly defend East Pakistan and they asked for more trouble. Masochists!
Pakistani military staff planners proposed the following doctrine to justify this deployment: "The defence of the East lies in the West". Broadly speaking, this translated into Pakistan defeating India in the west, regardless of what transpired in the east (including Indian occupation of East Pakistan) because they presumed West Pakistani success would force India to negotiate a favourable settlement. The Pakistani staff also believed in the martial race theory; it was widely believed that one Pakistani soldier was equal to four to ten Hindus/Indian soldiers.
Insurgents, Terrorists, and Militias: The Warriors of Contemporary Combat. Richard H. Shultz, Andrea Dew: "The Martial Races Theory had firm adherents in Pakistan and this factor played a major role in the under-estimation of the Indian Army by Pakistani soldiers as well as civilian decision makers in 1965." & Library of Congress studies.
The Pakistan Army show poor appreciation of the threat and was found woefully wanting.
The charmingly worded '
loola langri' action in 1971 merely proved that
loola langras are adequate to defeat a moribund, illiterate, ill educated, unprofessional morass passing off as Pakistan.
Imagine what would happen if it was '
loola langri,
It was clever apppreciation of the Indian military to realise that a ]'
loola langri action was more than adequate to knock a dead and decrypt nation!
And you are proving them right ever since, including now.
Give my regards to Sharifs (both the PM and the Chief), Imran and Qadri.
Keep saying -
Blessent mon cœur d'une langueur monotone ("wound my heart with a monotonous languor")
it is your anthem of your whine and ignorance in all aspect that you comment on.