We all love koolaidI think Indian Navy is the second strongest Navy in Asia, the fact is Brahmos has changed the game and has given us a great advantage, we can pretty much take down all the ships in PLAN or USN with Brahmos launches, even Supercarriers aren't safe. With range of 300km, every IN ship armed with Brahmos has a 600km diameter of lethal offensive protection. Coming to subs, we do have good anti sub abilities and with P-8I coming that ability will be enhanced. We should also inducted air launched brahmos on the T-142ME naval aircraft as well as the IL-38. The only reason why PLAN is stonger is the nuke capable subs.
I think we should quickly order 30 ATVs, smallest nuke subs in the world, k-15 missile is ideal for land attacks on over the horizon radars to take out the ability of chinese to use their new ASBM. ATV is ideal, we should have around 30 ATV by 2030.
why are you so much into aegies-equipped ships when u know that brahmos can tear down its defense into pieces...at mach 3 they cant even track them properly on radar and you talking about it being defended by aegies-think again!!Koreans have Aegis ships now as well. When Dehli class DDG came out, it was argurably the 2nd best destroyer fielded by an asian navy (if we leave out the Russian and US navy) after the japanese Kongo class. But time has moved on, now it is doubtful if it is even among the top 10. The top 3, however, are quite clear. They are all Aegis-based:
1. Japanese Atago
2. Korean (ROK) KDX III
3. Japanse Kongo
C602 has longer range. Brahmos is not the only supersonic ASM in service today. Just in Asia, China has ship-based Sunburn, airboune YJ-12 and YJ-91 (KH-31), as well as vintage shore-absed C101 and C301, taiwan has Hsiung Feng III, indonesia has just acquired Yakhont.why are you so much into aegies-equipped ships when u know that brahmos can tear down its defense into pieces...at mach 3 they cant even track them properly on radar and you talking about it being defended by aegies-think again!!
BTW...chinese C602 is subsonic missiles while brahmos is supersonic-they are class apart..
Aegis equipped Destroyers can be put into bits by a Brahmos by the poster was a stretch, but this above takes the cake.C602 has longer range. Brahmos is not the only supersonic ASM in service today. Just in Asia, China has ship-based Sunburn, airboune YJ-12 and YJ-91 (KH-31), as well as vintage shore-absed C101 and C301, taiwan has Hsiung Feng III, indonesia has just acquired Yakhont.
Regarding the Aegis-base ships, the Aegis system was designed to intercept supersonic anti-ship missiles, even in a saturation attack. Also Russians always exaggerate the performance of their weapons, which prompts me to think that the specs of Brahmos are valid only under ideal (thus unrealistic) conditions.
lol, This is even better, Chicom might be churning in more (wrt to South Korea) low quality junk which even the Thai navy hates , but they are no where close to quality ship building done by Koreans. Not even in the same the damn era. Here we have a ship building expert, who look at a pic, decided its not good quality welding, while one of the most powerful navy's in the field with access to the best steel and other ship building technology. dont know. wow! we are truly blessed to have you. This photoshop chicoms are delusionalAnother thing to consider when we talk about the capability of a warship is the quality of the ships themselves. Even though China overtook South Korea as world's largest shipbuilder in terms of gross tonnage, both S.Korea and Japan are still much more advanced in technology. India on the other hand is very much a novice when it comes to shipbuilding. I've seen close-up pictures of the Mumbai class warships, the welding quality was, to put it mildly, not very good.
you are deeply delusional EL/M-2248 is second best naval radar in the world after the non exportable versions of AegisEven when Kolkotta is inducted, it will not be among the top 3. The edge enjoyed by the top 3 is jusy way too much to overcome. Whether it will edge out 052C as the 4th best is debatable:
EL/M-2248 vs Type 348
Brahmos vs C602
BarakII vs HHQ-9
AK630 vs Type 730
Indian build quality vs chinese build quality
huh, i don't know...
you are deeply delusional EL/M-2248 is second best naval radar in the world after the non exportable versions of Aegis
Barack ng is far superior (mach 5 ultra maneuvering missile ) to naval s-300 ripoff (you have to reload very 4 shots)
both India and china use yakhont variants
having Israeli fcs and com equipment will give the Indians some edge
India is a partner in the sea spotter project (Rafael) by 2015 they will have the only maritime long range electo-optical sensor in the world
Not happening, He might not be using a strong language, but he is doing something sinister than that, he and the rest of the chinese come here deliberately to show how we are not worthy enough to be on the same plate as them, how our achievements arent as good or not worthy, who our people are below standards, how they are the next superpowers and the worthy foes of USA, They are here to demean us, and they do that in every post, in a sweet sweet way. I am not going to take it. My responses will not be sweet.You could use better language. Please refrain, this is not the first time I'm seeing it.
Regards,
Virendra
Just 1 ton, but somehow it was better than yours in the counts of quality and originality, Everybody can make cheap ass goods.In 2010 China's shipbuilders churned out 15.9 million gross tonnage worth of ships totaling 30.6 billion US dollars in value.
What are the equivalent india numbers?
Your outpouring just shows how different south asians think compared with east asians. Keep it coming Pal!Not happening, He might not be using a strong language, but he is doing something sinister than that, he and the rest of the chinese come here deliberately to show how we are not worthy enough to be on the same plate as them, how our achievements arent as good or not worthy, who our people are below standards, how they are the next superpowers and the worthy foes of USA, They are here to demean us, and they do that in every post, in a sweet sweet way. I am not going to take it. My responses will not be sweet.
So you would resort to foul mouth to reply on that? Even when you know (as you say) that it is their propoganda?Not happening, He might not be using a strong language, but he is doing something sinister than that, he and the rest of the chinese come here deliberately to show how we are not worthy enough to be on the same plate as them, how our achievements arent as good or not worthy, who our people are below standards, how they are the next superpowers and the worthy foes of USA, They are here to demean us, and they do that in every post, in a sweet sweet way. I am not going to take it. My responses will not be sweet.
Adux, I didn't find Tony using such strong language in his previous post.. DFI is meant to be members across the countries to share the knowledge they do have and sometimes, the discussion might get overrun due to hot languages.. But nothing similar to that happened here..Not happening, He might not be using a strong language, but he is doing something sinister than that, he and the rest of the chinese come here deliberately to show how we are not worthy enough to be on the same plate as them, how our achievements arent as good or not worthy, who our people are below standards, how they are the next superpowers and the worthy foes of USA, They are here to demean us, and they do that in every post, in a sweet sweet way. I am not going to take it. My responses will not be sweet.