DO YOU KNOOW THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN ENTRAPMENT AND THE VICTIM? Entrapment is the process of instigating deceit or fraud to introduce a decoy or trap for the purpose of falsifying the pursuit of liability. The logic of entrapment is to counterfeit the process of pursuit, to falsify the progress of liability in order to subdue or defile the goal of custody. Mandated profits (mandated auto insurance) is a form of entrapment. Drug testing is a form of entrapment. The navy uses the logic of liability to establish the source or ignition to a "threat" or "variable circumstances" in order to define conduct to the "rules of engagement" for weapons release authority. Target acquisition is based on the ability to pursue the causes of circumstance and never the consequence. Threats are determined by the cause and not the consequence. Any process that teaches pursuit to apprehend the causes is " Top Gun"; but any process that teaches pursuit to apprehend the consequences is "Sitting Duck". Are you a "Top Gun" or just another "Sitting Duck" Do you get answers from yourself or do they always come from the other person. Can you explain in your own words what you think the difference between liability and counterfeit is. Someone has to advocate the legitimacy of weapons release authority sooner of later. The focus of topic in the next few paragraphs is not about drugs or insurance, but the focus is about , whether or not you as a person can explain the difference between "liability" and "counterfeit" The following current affairs are conditions of entrapment introduced to the citizens. (1). Drug testing is wrong, because it pursues the consequence and not the cause, and it has no intention to apprehend the causes of drug supply, more than allowing the recruit of the drug user in order to validate the quota of its pursuit to implicate the consequence and not the cause. To pursue the cause of drug supply prevents the progress of the drug user. Drug testing allows the source of drug supply in order to recruit the progress to "chase the user". (2). "Mandated profits" is wrong because it allows auto insurance industry to pawn the citizens income allowance at the expense of the U.S. treasury in order to falsify the surplus of its market demand for imposing or forcing the voucher of its supply or services on the citizens in the evacuation to escape and bail out the failing market of insurance industry that had no clients to save them from otherwise bankruptcy or tax evasion. Insurance is not the boss liablity. The consequences did not invent the cuses. Insurance does not gurantee the progress of accountability, because receiving is not the boss of giving. It is faster to give than it is to receive, and that is why output does not predict input. The input factors project the forecast of output. Mandated profits are unified embezzlements. Mandated profits pursue the consequence of treasury and not the cause. There are three stages of entrapment: 1. INFILTRATION 2. SABOTAGE 3. COUNTERFEIT A. INFILTRATION Infiltration is the process of posing as an imposter to extort or steal from a targeted regiment or union of supply, by impersonating the function to the supply for disrupting or blackmailing the pledge of consent related to the stock and bonds of the targeted supply union. The act of impersonating the function to the supply, is in order to deprive or prohibit its pledge of consent for the purpose of abolishing the authority of liability to the supply chain. The act of abolishing the authority of liability to the supply chain is for the purpose of forgery and fraud to destruct or prohibit the merit of sovereignty in order to dominate a system of counterfeit for preventing or disqualifying the delegation of ownership related to the legitimacy of supply liability. The act of dominating a system of counterfeit to overthrow ownership is for the purpose of destroying the priorities and goal of the targeted magistration by infiltrating its chain of giving. B. SABOTAGE Sabotage is the process of gaining controlling asset to the targeted regiment or union of production, by overthrowing its logic of custody in order to blackball or discriminate against its stocks and bonds. The act of controlling asset to blackball or discriminate against the targeted stocks and bonds is for the purpose of abolishing the authority of custody directly related to the targeted commonwealth. The act of abolishing the authority of custody to the targeted commonwealth is for the purpose of corrupting and prohibiting the merit of its administration in order to dominate a system of counterfeit for preventing or disqualifying the delegation of having or controlling asset related to the legitimacy of production. The act of dominating a system of counterfeit to overthrow custody is for the purpose of destroying the priorities and goal of the targeted stocks and bonds by infiltrating its chain of having or common wealth. C. COUNTERFEIT Counterfeit is the process of reform to mislead or contradict the logic of pursuit related to the production functions of a targeted territory, by overthrowing to blackball its registration for discriminating against its related royalties or merit of territory. The act of blackball or discrimination against a targeted registration by its territories of royalty is for the purpose of abolishing the authority of pursuit directly related to the targeted monopoly. The act of abolishing the authority of pursuit to the targeted monopoly is for the purpose of corrupting and prohibiting the merit of territory in order to dominate a system of counterfeit for preventing or disqualifying the controlling asset of pursuit related to the legitimacy of royalties and or demand by the matching sovereignty of supply. The act of dominating a system of counterfeit to overthrow pursuit is for the purpose of destroying the priorities and goal of the targeted monopoly by infiltrating its chain of receiving or registration. Do you participate in the promotion of entrapment or are you the victim; or are you both. You get what you give, because no one can keep more than their own ingredient to circumstance. Why be a trap, if the only thing it does is catch the provocator.