Deterrance as an Operational Objective

Discussion in 'West Asia & Africa' started by deltacamelately, Jun 26, 2009.

  1. deltacamelately

    deltacamelately Defence Professionals Defence Professionals

    Joined:
    Mar 25, 2009
    Messages:
    134
    Likes Received:
    5
    Gentlemen,

    We have debated on this topic at another place and I found the matter very interesting while being very intrigueing as well. Colonel Blasko, former US Defence Attache to China (read a spy) gave a presentation on the Chinese Armed Forces, making an observation, that to the PLA, deterrence is an OPOBJ.

    This basically states, that the Chinese will engage in military action against a smaller enemy in order to deter a larger enemy. The obvious example of this was the 1979 1st Sino-Vietnam War in which the PLA attacked Vietnam to deter a Soviet attack on China.

    It is also interesting to note that there hasn't been even one single war dating back to the Napoleonic Wars in Western military history that would be the case. However, for the Chinese, this has been normal practice ever since Sun Tzu's The Art of War.

    I will thus represent the question .....
    Has anyother military other than the Chinese Armed Forces fought small wars in order to deter a larger one?

    Aside :
    I have reasons to believe that Brigadier Ray has gone through Colonel Blasko's presentation, therefore his eval on this will be invaluable.
     
  2.  
  3. Ray

    Ray The Chairman Defence Professionals Moderator

    Joined:
    Apr 17, 2009
    Messages:
    43,118
    Likes Received:
    23,521
    Location:
    Somewhere
    I have not recd the article.
     
  4. p2prada

    p2prada Stars and Ambassadors Stars and Ambassadors

    Joined:
    May 25, 2009
    Messages:
    10,233
    Likes Received:
    3,895
    Location:
    Holy Hell
    That's high risk. What if the Soviets had decided to attack anyways? China would have to fight on 2 fronts. An asymmetric war against the small enemy and conventional against the larger one.

    I have not read the article either.
     
  5. Yusuf

    Yusuf GUARDIAN Administrator

    Joined:
    Mar 24, 2009
    Messages:
    24,270
    Likes Received:
    11,240
    Location:
    BANGalore
    I do not understand how attacking another small country will deter an attack from a bigger power?
    That apart, when a big power attacked a small one, it led to two world wars!!
     
  6. deltacamelately

    deltacamelately Defence Professionals Defence Professionals

    Joined:
    Mar 25, 2009
    Messages:
    134
    Likes Received:
    5
    Sir,

    I had assumed that somebody has already sent you the presentation.
    I have sent an article to your email id today.
    Here are the external links for the other viewers to see....

    YouTube - Chinese Military Expert Dennis J. Blasko Speaks at Whittier College (Part I)
    YouTube - Chinese Military Expert Dennis J. Blasko Speaks at Whittier College (Part II)

    However, I would recommend posters to dig a bit on Sun Tzu's Art of War to fully appreciate the Colonel's assessment.
     
  7. deltacamelately

    deltacamelately Defence Professionals Defence Professionals

    Joined:
    Mar 25, 2009
    Messages:
    134
    Likes Received:
    5
    Yusuf,

    Just to make the concept a little simpler, I'm posting Col W. Yu's assessment of this.
    So, this is open for debate, whether the Chinese rationale was realistic or was it just a one-off OPOBJ to elude some.
     
  8. EnlightenedMonk

    EnlightenedMonk Member of The Month JULY 2009 Senior Member

    Joined:
    Mar 7, 2009
    Messages:
    3,831
    Likes Received:
    21
    That's an interesting concept really...

    On the face of it, it seems like one might have to fight a war on two fronts, but a definite advantage is that it spices things up, both for the general public to get them going and for the Army to get into the groove of fighting...

    If you defeat the smaller enemy, the morale of the Army tends to be higher for a certain amount of time and they feel invincible... basically, it seems to me like it would be a mental stimulus more than anything else...

    As it is said, War is all about mental strategy and mind-games in addition to the show of might, so a mentally spruced up Army would have its obvious advantages...

    More than this, I think it would be difficult for me to analyse...

    But, I do think I should read Art of War because it's very unlike Sun Tzu to say anything without reason or proof or his own experience in something similar...
     
  9. Singh

    Singh Phat Cat Administrator

    Joined:
    Feb 23, 2009
    Messages:
    20,305
    Likes Received:
    8,268
    Location:
    011
  10. EnlightenedMonk

    EnlightenedMonk Member of The Month JULY 2009 Senior Member

    Joined:
    Mar 7, 2009
    Messages:
    3,831
    Likes Received:
    21
  11. Payeng

    Payeng Daku Mongol Singh

    Joined:
    Mar 7, 2009
    Messages:
    2,521
    Likes Received:
    767
    Location:
    Neistan
    Is it Pakistan? as if Pakistan won't declare war on terror the US would sure strike Pakistan IMO.

    Is it still so.
     
  12. Officer of Engineers

    Officer of Engineers Defence Professionals Defence Professionals

    Joined:
    May 22, 2009
    Messages:
    650
    Likes Received:
    11
    Oh for Pete's Sakes, there's nothing magical anything about the 1979 1st Sino-Vietnam War and their OPOJs (and for military purposes, you will have to consider the 1984 2nd Sino-VN War but that is not of concern here).

    In a nut shell, the Soviets did all their efforts in surrounding China meant squat! Any war against China would be decided in the North, not South. That's what the 1979 1st Sino-VN War has shown - that China has broken the Soviet encirclement.

    ... despite the fact that the PLA was shown to be a less qualified military force than WWI France ... because the Vietnamese were no better.

    Now, why they're ratted better than the Indians of the time, ask the people in the know and I am not one of them.
     
  13. deltacamelately

    deltacamelately Defence Professionals Defence Professionals

    Joined:
    Mar 25, 2009
    Messages:
    134
    Likes Received:
    5
     
  14. 1.44

    1.44 Member of The Month SEPTEMBER 2009 Senior Member

    Joined:
    Jun 8, 2009
    Messages:
    4,359
    Likes Received:
    19
    Besides the Sino-Vietnam conflict are there any other example's of countries using deterrence as OPOBJ?
     
  15. deltacamelately

    deltacamelately Defence Professionals Defence Professionals

    Joined:
    Mar 25, 2009
    Messages:
    134
    Likes Received:
    5
    None if you are talking from the PLA's perspective.
     
  16. Yusuf

    Yusuf GUARDIAN Administrator

    Joined:
    Mar 24, 2009
    Messages:
    24,270
    Likes Received:
    11,240
    Location:
    BANGalore
    Delta Sir, I was talking about this theory on another forum in the Indo China context where I asked if this theory could be used by China to attack Taiwan to fend off any American involvement on behalf of India in a war with China.
     
  17. SammyCheung

    SammyCheung Guest

    ^ That would not make logical sense to open another front, unless attacking Taiwan would be used to deter Japan.

    In any case, Taiwan is effectively Chinese territory. The "president" of Taiwan is getting ready to meet with the Chinese president in a summit.
     
  18. Officer of Engineers

    Officer of Engineers Defence Professionals Defence Professionals

    Joined:
    May 22, 2009
    Messages:
    650
    Likes Received:
    11
    Only in the Chinese historic context. Genghis took on the Jinn to deter the superior Soong. Tamir took on central Asia and presented a united front against the MING. And the Qing finished off the Mongols in an effort to deter the MING.
     

Share This Page