Dear Nitish, there is no such thing called a Bihar model

Discussion in 'Politics & Society' started by WMD, Mar 18, 2013.

  1. WMD

    WMD Regular Member

    Joined:
    Jan 2, 2013
    Messages:
    624
    Likes Received:
    792
    Location:
    City of Temples
    Dear Nitish, there is no such thing called a Bihar model

    Several subtle and not-so-subtle messages were embedded in Nitish Kumar’s Adhikar rally speech in Delhi yesterday.

    One thing can be said upfront, though: his statements were more politics than economics, even though he talked of his own “development model” and special status for Bihar.

    The key statements, and the questions that arise from his speech include the following.

    “We are happy that the UPA government has agreed in principle to grant our demand (for special status to Bihar). But now we want it to be implemented soon. Do it now or it will be inevitable after 2014 elections. Only he who holds the hands of backward states (Bihar, Odisha and West Bengal) will sit in Delhi.” (The Times of India).

    This has been interpreted to mean that Nitish Kumar is open to shifting alliances after 2014. In short, he may dump the NDA for the UPA, if the latter gives him special status for Bihar.

    The truth is more subtle.

    First, it should be obvious to anyone that both the NDA and UPA exist only post-elections. Alliances take shape after an election, once everyone knows who has how many seats. The NDA has only three all-weather parties – Shiv Sena/MNS, and Akali Dal. The rest are opportunist parties. The UPA has no permanent allies, but anyone inimical to the BJP is a potential ally. Conversely, anyone for whom the Congress is the main rival is a potential NDA ally.

    So, there is nothing startling about Nitish talking about going with the highest bidder for his crop of Bihar MPs after the next elections.

    Second, Nitish Kumar’s only problem with the NDA is Narendra Modi. Even now he is in partnership with the BJP in his state, and his real problem with the NDA is that he can never lead it as long as Modi is a contender.

    Unfortunately for him, even as he was issuing his “open to all alliances threat”, the Bihar unit of the BJP was preparing for a possible separation from Kumar’s Janata Dal (United). On the same day on which Kumar was to address the Adhikar rally in Delhi, his Deputy Chief Minister, Sushil Kumar Modi, once considered less than inclined to work with his Gujarat namesake, made it clear that he was for Narendra Modi.

    Speaking at the Bihar BJP executive meeting in Patna, Sushil Kumar Modi is reported as saying by The Indian Express: “I have 35 years of association with Narendra Modi right from my ABVP days. It is the media that has been trying to create differences between me and Modi. We know that 2014 is going to be a battle between the BJP ideology and a Congress family. We are ready to go to the polls under the leadership of Narendra Modi if the party decides so.”

    What could be clearer than that? And just in case Nitish Kumar hasn’t got the message, he said pointedly: “The Congress now has become a sinking ship and those willing to ride it will sink automatically.”

    The clear takeout from this is: Both Nitish Kumar and the BJP know that once Narendra Modi is projected formally, the former will either have to like it or lump it. By saying that he will go with whoever gives Bihar special status, he is thus stating his price. Maybe the price will be offered by Modi after the elections. It has no significance beyond that. For its part, the Bihar BJP will seek to keep the alliance steady till the elections, and then decide whether to stay on or part company with Nitish Kumar.

    The next major point Nitish Kumar made in his speech relates to the Bihar development model. According to The Economic Times, he said: “These days, several development models are being discussed. We believe in an inclusive model. It seeks the empowerment of every section, every community and every caste.”

    The Times of India had a small variant of this quote. It reported additionally: “We will leave everyone behind and move ahead with development. And we will present a model before the world….This is the real development model of India. Be it Hindu, Muslim, backward caste, dalits, women or men, everyone should develop together.”

    Take both these versions together, and the interpretation is that Kumar is again debunking the Gujarat development model espoused by Modi.

    Quite apart from the fact that Nitish Kumar has not quite unveiled his development model (he says “we will present a model”, not “we have presented a model”), let’s first ask ourselves what exactly is the Modi development model that Kumar is so riled about? Modi’s critics have injected this point into the debate: that the Gujarat model is about excluding specific communities, and chasing growth over other human development indicators.

    Let’s be clear, there is no Modi model or Gujarat model. The world has seen three development models – with small country-level variations – in the 20th century. One is the capitalist model pursued by the US, the other was the Communist/statist model followed by pre-Berlin Wall Soviet Russia and China (and some of their client states). The third is the European model, which gives the state a big role in welfare spending, but also assigns a key growth role to private players.

    After the 1980s, almost all countries abandoned the Soviet model, including and especially the Chinese Communists. This leaves us with only two models to choose from – the American and the European ones. Both are now in deep trouble, but the betting is that America’s free enterprise spirit will somehow find its way out of the crisis. (There is some talk of a Nordic model, where the state does seek high taxes and in return offer high welfare benefits, but this can work only in monocultural countries with high levels of internal trust. It cannot work in multi-cultural countries like America and India.)

    The Gujarat model is no different from the US or Chinese model – except for the political system that underpins them. The Gujarat model is no different from the south-east Asian model which produced the Asian tiger economies of the last quarter of the 20th century.

    Manmohan Singh adopted the south-east Asian model with liberalisation in 1991, but then, after years out of power, the Congress under Sonia Gandhi slipped back to the welfarist model. This has brought economic decline after the initial (undeserved) growth phase petered out.

    The so-called “inclusivist” element in the UPA or Bihar model is really a socio-political arrangement, where the benefits of growth are supposed to be shared through quotas and other such devices, even though they may be socially and politically divisive.

    You can achieve inclusiveness in two ways: bake the cake first and then figure out how to share it; or fight about the cake before it is baked.

    In both models, you need growth first and then re-distribution of the benefits. You cannot have it the other way. Nitish Kumar himself has been tomtomming the fact that Bihar has been topping the growth leagues, and even in Delhi he said as much when he chest-thumped: “We will leave everyone behind…”.

    So he obviously believes in at least the first part of the Modi model: get growth up fast. In India, Gujarat, and many other states, including Tamil Nadu, Maharashtra, and Karnataka, have adopted the south-east Asian growth model, but only Modi has given ideological shape to it. He has adopted the Chinese version of it – chasing growth with high investments in infrastructure. Hence the emergence of the Gujarat model.

    Economists Jagdish Bhagwati and Arvind Panagariya proved in their book, India’s Tryst With Destiny: Debunking Myths that Undermine Progress and Addressing New Challenges, even the so-called Kerala model based on human development indices is nothing but the same Gujarat model based on private investments leading to growth.

    They write: “It is ultimately the Gujarat model that has delivered in Kerala. Contrary to common claims, Kerala has been a rapidly growing state in the post-independence era, which is the reason it ranks fourth among the larger states, according to per-capita gross state domestic product and first according to per capita expenditure.” They add that Kerala “suffers from the highest level of inequality among the larger states. So growth, and not redistribution, largely explains low levels of poverty.”

    That should tell Nitish Kumar something. India may or may not require Modi, but it requires the Gujarat model – as Modi himself said the other day.

    Just as criticism of his lagging human development indicators told Modi something. Not surprisingly, Modi’s manifesto for the 2012 Gujarat elections talked of inclusive growth. The difference is, having achieved growth, he can deliver inclusiveness.

    Now let’s see if there is something called the Bihar model. Nitish Kumar’s first demand is “special status” for Bihar. A special status is usually given to hilly regions where industry does not go without incentives. This is why states in the north-east, Himachal Pradesh and Uttarakhand have been given special status.

    But what is Bihar’s claim to special status beyond backwardness? Can a development model work if it is only based on handouts from the centre? And, even assuming some grants help alleviate poverty, what is special status really about? It’s about giving tax benefits to investors. As this Firstpost story notes, Nitish Kumar’s ideas speak of a poverty of ideas rather than anything else.

    Now what is Modi doing? He is giving tax incentives to big infrastructure companies and automobile giants to set up shop in his states. In short, he has converted his state into a special category state by offering incentives for development. What stops Bihar from doing the same? It would seem Nitish Kumar needs to do the same as Modi to develop industry in his state.

    Moreover, it isn’t as if Bihar does not benefit from central largesse even now. In the centrally-funded NREGA scheme, Bihar gave employment of 57.4 million in 2012-13 so far; Gujarat to 21.7 million.

    As things stand, we can only see the politics of the Bihar model, not its economics. Kumar said: “Be it Hindu, Muslim, backward caste, Dalits, women or men, everyone should develop together.”

    This, unfortunately, means giving rights and quotas based on identity. It is surely one model of inclusiveness, but not the only one. It may serve Nitish Kumar’s politics well, but one wonders if it will serve his state all that well.

    From all that he has said and done, we have not seen anything called the Bihar development model.


    Dear Nitish, there is no such thing called a Bihar model | Firstpost
     
    K Factor, maomao, A chauhan and 2 others like this.
  2.  
  3. Apollyon

    Apollyon Führer Senior Member

    Joined:
    Nov 13, 2011
    Messages:
    2,600
    Likes Received:
    2,380
    Location:
    आर्यावर्त
  4. Raj30

    Raj30 Senior Member Senior Member

    Joined:
    May 24, 2012
    Messages:
    1,327
    Likes Received:
    1,603
    The UnReal Times [email protected]
    Beggar 1 to Beggar 2: "From now on, we won't call what we do as 'begging'" | Beggar 2: "What then?" | "We'll call it our Adhikar"
     
  5. Raj30

    Raj30 Senior Member Senior Member

    Joined:
    May 24, 2012
    Messages:
    1,327
    Likes Received:
    1,603
    Nitish Kumar asks Arundhati Roy to help Biharis feel paranoid like crazy | Faking News

    Patna. After leading a rally to demand special status for Bihar to achieve development, Chief Minister Nitish Kumar has approached essay developer Arundhati Roy to help him with this mission.
    “The first step towards being eligible for special treatment is to feel victimized, and Arundhati Roy has special skills in making people feel that way,” a close aide of Nitish Kumar explained why the fiction-writer-turned-fiction-believer was approached.

    Arundhati Roy, smiling at the prospects of another piece of fiction she can come up with.
    According to well-placed sources, Roy is working on a theory where she will declare Biharis as belonging to a religion distinct from Hinduism.
    “This will do wonders to the victim mentality,” a source told Faking News, “Pamphlets will be distributed all across Bihar arguing that Biharis are mocked at, hated, and driven away from different parts of India because they are not Hindus.”
    “Not only that, once we have a working theory that Biharis are not Hindus, it will very easy to get intellectual and international support,” the source added.
    Sources further reveal that Roy is working on a cocktail of Aryan-invasion premise, Brahminism-Buddhism relationship, and some totally random shit to come up with a new theory.
    It’s not yet clear if Nitish Kumar has agreed to adopt this theory because his alliance partner BJP will surely oppose any such move. However, sources claim that Arundhati Roy has decided to go ahead with her essay whether or not Nitish Kumar gives a green signal.
    “She’s excited at the prospects of trolling the whole nation again,” a source claimed.
     
  6. HEILTAMIL

    HEILTAMIL Regular Member

    Joined:
    Mar 15, 2013
    Messages:
    238
    Likes Received:
    57
    Location:
    UNION OF INDIA
    In his Bihar model, he fails to include the successive Bihari Governement sole agenda of keeping Bihar in medieval ages
     
  7. A chauhan

    A chauhan "अहिंसा परमो धर्मः धर्म हिंसा तथैव च: l" Senior Member

    Joined:
    Oct 10, 2009
    Messages:
    4,926
    Likes Received:
    4,556
    Location:
    Raipur
    What is Bihar model:wat:? This Nitish is seriously drooling for PM's post which he doesn't deserve, when he failed to plan and develop Bihar then he started to beg a State-reservation calling it 'Adhikar' :lol: he utterly fails when he compares himself with Modi !
     
  8. GPM

    GPM Tihar Jail Banned

    Joined:
    Mar 5, 2011
    Messages:
    1,510
    Likes Received:
    506
    MMS, sar, please give us 50k crore.

    Nitishji, after we are finished with current round of scams, we will see.

    After 2014 election, Namo offers 100k to Bihar, sans Nitish. He says Nitish will return the checque.
     
  9. Decklander

    Decklander New Member

    Joined:
    Nov 19, 2012
    Messages:
    2,654
    Likes Received:
    4,043
    Location:
    New Delhi
    Pls compare the Bihar of 2002, it was sitting atop one of the biggest mineral wealths of India. Jharkhand was still part of Bihar. It had more than sufficient water, coal and sunshine. Bihar has to export manpower as it has no jobs and does so even today. Nitish is still begging for special status. Biharis are known for begging all over India and they have come to Delhi now to beg and this is their model of development. they claim that Kosi river is a bane for them, NAMO connected his rivers to make use of flood waters and has not called his rivers a bane for his state. Who stopped Nitish from doing the same within his state.
    Gujrat of 2002 had been still recovering from Latur earthquake and Godhra riots with hardly any water, coal or other mineral resources. The growth of Gujrat compared to Bihar is clear indication of what NAMO has done. Gujrat has least uneployement, it imports people for jobs, It is power surplus and contributes nearly 10% to national GDP, while Bihar does not even contribute even 3%. Bihar sucks central funds, Gujrat fills the coffers of central govt. BJP must break away from Nitish asap and show this Bihari his place and stature. Let Bihar BJP use the Mantra," SuMo, NaMo Namah:"
     
    K Factor, aragorn, maomao and 5 others like this.
  10. sasi

    sasi Senior Member Senior Member

    Joined:
    Nov 18, 2012
    Messages:
    3,401
    Likes Received:
    1,679
    Location:
    India
    special status for Bihar ~ pandora's box! :mad:
     
    parijataka likes this.
  11. HEILTAMIL

    HEILTAMIL Regular Member

    Joined:
    Mar 15, 2013
    Messages:
    238
    Likes Received:
    57
    Location:
    UNION OF INDIA
    This is what happens when natural resources are exploited, instead of exploiting human resources,
     
  12. nrj

    nrj Stars and Ambassadors Stars and Ambassadors

    Joined:
    Nov 16, 2009
    Messages:
    9,252
    Likes Received:
    3,347
    Location:
    Brussels
    Believe it or not, Bihar's rate of growth in last 5-6 years in among top in country.

    Bihar model exists, it is called Nitish's electoral campaign model. If he is able to pull it successfully again with half-dozen ivy league MBA grads from US, he will become the Kingmaker.
     
    parijataka likes this.
  13. VIP

    VIP Ultra Nationalist Senior Member

    Joined:
    Mar 22, 2012
    Messages:
    4,684
    Likes Received:
    3,185
    Location:
    Gandhinagar
    


Howmany L.S. seats Bihar does have ??
     
    maomao likes this.
  14. Splurgenxs

    Splurgenxs Regular Member

    Joined:
    Aug 23, 2012
    Messages:
    57
    Likes Received:
    52
    i had an inkling Nitish would tun out to be a inductive spineless nincompoop ,guess it turned out true.

    I still don't think Nitish is entirely and idiot...even in BS maneuvers he still thinks good for his state.

    Though what he gets or achieves is whats gonna define him as a leader in the end.

    im only bothered with the end not the means.
     
  15. warriorextreme

    warriorextreme Senior Member Senior Member

    Joined:
    Sep 29, 2010
    Messages:
    1,369
    Likes Received:
    536
    Location:
    Mumbai
    Yes there is a Bihar Model....

     
    Last edited by a moderator: May 10, 2015
  16. GPM

    GPM Tihar Jail Banned

    Joined:
    Mar 5, 2011
    Messages:
    1,510
    Likes Received:
    506
    Lols, 500 kms of roads is impressive stat for Bihar, but not for Gujarat. Bihar roads grow by 12%? In Gujarat the roads are already far far better than Bihar. Development? Patna still does not have 24x7 electricvity, not will it have unless losses are brought down from existing 45% to Gujarat level of 21%. Gujarat is bound to decrease the losses by another 5%, Bihar needs 25% reduction. This little things add upto a big pile.

    Then Modi does not grovel for funds.
     
    aragorn and maomao like this.
  17. Iamanidiot

    Iamanidiot Elite Member Elite Member

    Joined:
    Dec 21, 2009
    Messages:
    5,326
    Likes Received:
    1,493
    Arson,Murder,Cheating,Rape,Looting,Dacoitry soft power at work
     
  18. Iamanidiot

    Iamanidiot Elite Member Elite Member

    Joined:
    Dec 21, 2009
    Messages:
    5,326
    Likes Received:
    1,493
    Rapist Ram Singh is from Bihar-Bihari Brand.
     
  19. Yusuf

    Yusuf GUARDIAN Administrator

    Joined:
    Mar 24, 2009
    Messages:
    24,272
    Likes Received:
    11,275
    Location:
    BANGalore
    I really need to know what is meant by special status. What Benefits will be accorded to it? Will it get just more funds? If yes, who will be accountable for the funds. What are the basis of the funds demanded? Is there any concrete project or projects that will help Bihar using the funds demanded?
     
  20. Ray

    Ray The Chairman Defence Professionals Moderator

    Joined:
    Apr 17, 2009
    Messages:
    43,118
    Likes Received:
    23,543
    Location:
    Somewhere
    Bihar Model means turning an anarchic governance into an acceptable governance.

    Indeed Bihar leads!

    Kudos to Nitish.
     
    devgupt likes this.
  21. Ray

    Ray The Chairman Defence Professionals Moderator

    Joined:
    Apr 17, 2009
    Messages:
    43,118
    Likes Received:
    23,543
    Location:
    Somewhere
    I presume it means either pay up or Modi is our Man! ;)
     
    maomao likes this.

Share This Page