Wrong example! When USSR collapsed, the independence of all the asian republics were accpeted by Russia. Actually, Russia was also freed from its obiligation to USSR. If you check USSR's constitution, it gave its members the right to quit. In the case of Tibet, there was no Chinese gov ever agree on that! And there was no Chinese law gave any part of its provinces such right. So, if tibet want to quit, either convince Chinese to accept or force Chinese to accept. Too bad, Tibetans did neither of them. They didn't even tell Chinese their independence officially.
TIBET was an independent country before its forcible occupation by Chinese, did Chinese asked TIBET before its annexation? Similarly what China thinks is immaterial in this context... Tibetans have to fight for their independence and world supports them in their cause"¦
As I said, the deal was signed by both sides. The termination of the treaty need approval from both sides. The tibetans need to get China to agree either by swords or words. They failed in both ways. Certainly you talk all beauty of the "self-determination", Chinese is not going to give up without a bloody fight. If you are not wiling to sacrify indian blood for this cause, then don't make your shit of "world supports them".
This, precisely. To all DFI members who keep harping about how Tibet should be independent, I have one question to ask: who's going to bleed for that mythical independence?
Why do one need approval from China for termination of the treaty? Is it written in that treaty? If the people want to be free of the Chinese tyranny & killings why do you want to hold them back? Why are the monks self immolating themselves just for LOVE OF CHINA?
To put is simply China will bleed along with TIBET!!
Who's going to make China bleed? Tibetan separatists in Tibet?
Why not ?? Are you not bleeding in East Turkestan ??
East Turkestan, not Turkmenistan.
Not by much, no. 'Tis but a flesh wound, m'dear.
And also, Uighur separatists don't choose self-immolation as their protest vehicle of choice, presumably because they can do more effective actions. Tibetan separatists have literally no options - if one is Tibetan and has a weapon in the Tibetan plateau, they are immediately jailed, simple as that; plus the standard PAP soldier there carries an assault rifle and body armor, so it's pretty hard to fight them as a civilian
My bad... I stand corrected... edited the post...
So you suggest Tibetans learn from Uighur separatists ?And also, Uighur separatists don't choose self-immolation as their protest vehicle of choice, presumably because they can do more effective actions. Tibetan separatists have literally no options - if one is Tibetan and has a weapon in the Tibetan plateau, they are immediately jailed, simple as that; plus the standard PAP soldier there carries an assault rifle and body armor, so it's pretty hard to fight them as a civilian
No, first off, because Tibetans =/= Tibetan separatists; and two, because if Tibetan separatists did, they'd suffer in far greater numbers than they are today - for the simple fact that Tibet is hermetically sealed by the PAP and PLA - no way to get any weapons onto the plateau. Hence, any armed resistance would be done without modern weapons - imagine knives and spears versus light armor, helicopter gunships, and Predator clones...
When that happens, the world will know, and PRC will not only get kicked out of UN, but will face embargo from the rest of the world, on which it is so badly dependent for its own economic survival. Moreover, PRC can keep hanging onto those US bonds, which will always be there to haunt PRC and make it toe the west's line. Try anything silly, and the screws will be tightened.
Bomb making has now become a cottage industry around the world.
So confident you are but your CCP is sensitive and shows unease on mere mention of TIBET... this shows you are not in full control of TIBET...
