3deffect
Regular Member
- Joined
- Mar 28, 2016
- Messages
- 471
- Likes
- 549
optical fibre is old thing..i am using optical fibre broadband in home from past 5 yrs..
d/l speed - 20mbps (100gb) after that 2mbps unlimited
u/l speed- 5mbps
OBOR News & Developments
- Thread starter Raja.pakistani
- Start date
d/l speed - 20mbps (100gb) after that 2mbps unlimited
u/l speed- 5mbps
- Joined
- Mar 19, 2016
- Messages
- 5,718
- Likes
- 11,618
Your isp?????????????????????????????????????????
- Joined
- Apr 29, 2015
- Messages
- 18,277
- Likes
- 56,182
- Joined
- Mar 19, 2016
- Messages
- 5,718
- Likes
- 11,618
Toh pm mein bhej do..................................
- Joined
- Apr 29, 2015
- Messages
- 18,277
- Likes
- 56,182
Bhejta hun...
30 char 30 char 30 char.
@Indx TechStyle ......... I didn't expected this blunder from you at least.......... You have posted wrong post in a wrong thread. Its a criminal offence as per DFI rule book...Inside the Comment Section:
(Don't know if really a fanboy or sarcastically joking).
View attachment 11567
But this second one is hilarious indeed.:biggrin2:
View attachment 11568
@airtel @Akask kumar @SREEKAR @Project Dharma @Navnit Kundu
A dream of Near East and West Asia Company of China, a counterpart to British East India Company.
Anyway, India is their real Papa. China is actually uncle.
- Joined
- Apr 29, 2015
- Messages
- 18,277
- Likes
- 56,182
I just changed my rules of engagement.@Indx TechStyle ......... I didn't expected this blunder from you at least.......... You have posted wrong post in a wrong thread. Its a criminal offence as per DFI rule book...
CPEC related stupidity on related thread, ISRO related concerns on ISRO thread etc..
Though I hate that thread and want to discontinue. There are a little foreign members on this forum.
3deffect
Regular Member
- Joined
- Mar 28, 2016
- Messages
- 471
- Likes
- 549
you are mistaken
it's a shipment of 72 virgins and they are invisible
airtel
Senior Member
- Joined
- Dec 25, 2015
- Messages
- 3,430
- Likes
- 7,814
Senators fear China may use CPEC to enhance trade with India
Syed Irfan Raza — Updated Nov 17, 2016 09:09am
WHATSAPP
16 Comments
Email
Print
ISLAMABAD: Some lawmakers expressed concern on Wednesday over the possible use of the China-Pakistan Economic Corridor (CPEC) by China to enhance trade with India.
During a meeting of the Senate Standing Committee on Planning and Development, some lawmakers were of the view that China was investing in the CPEC project to explore new vistas of trade with different countries right from neighbouring India to Central Asian states and Europe.
Chairman of the committee Syed Tahir Hussain Mashhadi endorsed a point of view of a senator that with improved rail and road links with India through Munabao and Amritsar under the CPEC, China would expand its trade not only with Central Asian states and European countries but also with India to economically strengthen its eight underdeveloped provinces.
“China will definitely use the CPEC to expand trade with India because one who invests always watches one’s interests first,” Mr Mashhadi said.
He said China’s trade relations with India were far bigger than with Pakistan as China had inked $100 billion trade agreements with India last year.
“Irrespective of sour Pakistan-India relations, China will do trade with Indian through the CPEC,” Mr Mashhadi said.
Members of the committee asked railway authorities to lay rail tracks called ML-2 and ML-3 that link Pakistan with Iran and Afghanistan and Central Asian states.
“These projects must be on the priority of China to reach these destinations,” Senator Saud Majeed said.
However, railway officials informed the committee that they were focusing on improving the existing rail tracks called ML-1 from Karachi to upcountry as a majority of the people lived in the areas falling in alignment of ML-1.
Senator Sirajul Haq said that the government should give priority first to those projects which were beneficial to the people of Pakistan and then it should safeguard interests of China.
He was of the view that if the people of less developed areas in Sindh, Balochistan, Khyber Pakhtunkhwa and Federally Administered Tribal Areas (Fata) did not benefit from the CPEC, they would have no other option but to take up arms to earn their livelihood.
“If economic conditions of ignored areas are not improved, people living in those areas will be compelled to fight against anybody for only Rs2,000,” the Jamaat-i-Islami chief said.
The officials of Pakistan Railways informed the committee that all rail projects being executed under the CPEC were planned by both Pakistan and China and the former alone could not go for any project on its own.
“Both countries have joint working groups which plan and finalise projects,” they said.
At this, Senator Haq said that recently some of his colleagues had visited China for discussions on the CPEC where they were informed by Chinese authorities that Pakistan had the sole right of planning and decision-making about CPEC projects and China had nothing to do with it.
Senator Mohammad Usman Khan Kakar said that Pakistan Railways had not taken even a single step forward.
“We have not gone beyond what we inherited from the British rulers,” he regretted.
He suggested that plans for new railway tracks in Sindh and Balochistan (ML-2 and ML-3) must be implemented immediately because these were the routes which would make Pakistan economically strong.
“We have abundance of natural resources like gold, copper, silver, marble and granite in these areas which can be marketed to Iran, Afghanistan and Central Asian states through rail routes,” he said.
The committee was informed that a majority of electricity generation projects started by the government would be completed between 2018 and 2020.
Published in Dawn November 17th, 2016
Syed Irfan Raza — Updated Nov 17, 2016 09:09am
16 Comments
ISLAMABAD: Some lawmakers expressed concern on Wednesday over the possible use of the China-Pakistan Economic Corridor (CPEC) by China to enhance trade with India.
During a meeting of the Senate Standing Committee on Planning and Development, some lawmakers were of the view that China was investing in the CPEC project to explore new vistas of trade with different countries right from neighbouring India to Central Asian states and Europe.
Chairman of the committee Syed Tahir Hussain Mashhadi endorsed a point of view of a senator that with improved rail and road links with India through Munabao and Amritsar under the CPEC, China would expand its trade not only with Central Asian states and European countries but also with India to economically strengthen its eight underdeveloped provinces.
“China will definitely use the CPEC to expand trade with India because one who invests always watches one’s interests first,” Mr Mashhadi said.
He said China’s trade relations with India were far bigger than with Pakistan as China had inked $100 billion trade agreements with India last year.
“Irrespective of sour Pakistan-India relations, China will do trade with Indian through the CPEC,” Mr Mashhadi said.
Members of the committee asked railway authorities to lay rail tracks called ML-2 and ML-3 that link Pakistan with Iran and Afghanistan and Central Asian states.
“These projects must be on the priority of China to reach these destinations,” Senator Saud Majeed said.
However, railway officials informed the committee that they were focusing on improving the existing rail tracks called ML-1 from Karachi to upcountry as a majority of the people lived in the areas falling in alignment of ML-1.
Senator Sirajul Haq said that the government should give priority first to those projects which were beneficial to the people of Pakistan and then it should safeguard interests of China.
He was of the view that if the people of less developed areas in Sindh, Balochistan, Khyber Pakhtunkhwa and Federally Administered Tribal Areas (Fata) did not benefit from the CPEC, they would have no other option but to take up arms to earn their livelihood.
“If economic conditions of ignored areas are not improved, people living in those areas will be compelled to fight against anybody for only Rs2,000,” the Jamaat-i-Islami chief said.
The officials of Pakistan Railways informed the committee that all rail projects being executed under the CPEC were planned by both Pakistan and China and the former alone could not go for any project on its own.
“Both countries have joint working groups which plan and finalise projects,” they said.
At this, Senator Haq said that recently some of his colleagues had visited China for discussions on the CPEC where they were informed by Chinese authorities that Pakistan had the sole right of planning and decision-making about CPEC projects and China had nothing to do with it.
Senator Mohammad Usman Khan Kakar said that Pakistan Railways had not taken even a single step forward.
“We have not gone beyond what we inherited from the British rulers,” he regretted.
He suggested that plans for new railway tracks in Sindh and Balochistan (ML-2 and ML-3) must be implemented immediately because these were the routes which would make Pakistan economically strong.
“We have abundance of natural resources like gold, copper, silver, marble and granite in these areas which can be marketed to Iran, Afghanistan and Central Asian states through rail routes,” he said.
The committee was informed that a majority of electricity generation projects started by the government would be completed between 2018 and 2020.
Published in Dawn November 17th, 2016
- Joined
- Sep 18, 2009
- Messages
- 9,080
- Likes
- 40,077
Let's play. This is my domestic Internet connection tested on servers around the world:
#DigitalIndia
- Joined
- Mar 19, 2016
- Messages
- 5,718
- Likes
- 11,618
What's monthly charge?This is my domestic Internet connection.
#DigitalIndia
............................................................
- Joined
- Sep 18, 2009
- Messages
- 9,080
- Likes
- 40,077
Updated post. Check now...................What's monthly charge?
............................................................
airtel
Senior Member
- Joined
- Dec 25, 2015
- Messages
- 3,430
- Likes
- 7,814
China Should Either Make Peace With India Or Forget About CPEC : Forbes
China desperately needs the China-Pakistan Economic Corridor (CPEC). It’s part of that nation’s vision to write the rules of the next stage of globalization and help its export and investment engines grow for years to come—a good prospect for investors in Chinese equities, which have been lagging behind of those of neighboring India.
Specifically, CPEC is the express link between Western China, the Middle East, and Africa–China’s second continent. Ideologically that is, which can explain why Beijing has committed $46 billion to the project.
The trouble is that CPEC passes through Pakistani regions claimed by India. That makes it a bumpy road, to say the least — Pakistan and India continue to fight for control of these regions.
That’s why China needs to make peace with India.
So far, China has done very little to appease India. In fact, it has done quite the opposite: repeatedly blocking India’s efforts to join the Nuclear Supplier Group (NSG).
And it has sided openly with Pakistan in the India-Pakistan Kashmir standoff, as evidenced by statements by China’s senior officials on the sidelines of the ongoing 71st session of United Nations General Assembly in New York.
That can explain why India’s has sided with the US in the South China Sea disputes, as previously discussed here.
And things could turn worse, if pro-Indian forces in Pakistan sabotage China’s CEPC route. :biggrin2::biggrin2::biggrin2:
That raises the possibility of an open confrontation between China and Pakistan on the one side, and India and its allies on the other.
Is China ready for this scenario? Probably not. That’s why Beijing should either appease New Delhi or forget about CEPC altogether.
www.forbes.com/sites/panosmourdoukoutas/2016/11/16/china-should-either-make-peace-with-india-or-forget-about-cpec/
China desperately needs the China-Pakistan Economic Corridor (CPEC). It’s part of that nation’s vision to write the rules of the next stage of globalization and help its export and investment engines grow for years to come—a good prospect for investors in Chinese equities, which have been lagging behind of those of neighboring India.
Specifically, CPEC is the express link between Western China, the Middle East, and Africa–China’s second continent. Ideologically that is, which can explain why Beijing has committed $46 billion to the project.
The trouble is that CPEC passes through Pakistani regions claimed by India. That makes it a bumpy road, to say the least — Pakistan and India continue to fight for control of these regions.
That’s why China needs to make peace with India.
So far, China has done very little to appease India. In fact, it has done quite the opposite: repeatedly blocking India’s efforts to join the Nuclear Supplier Group (NSG).
And it has sided openly with Pakistan in the India-Pakistan Kashmir standoff, as evidenced by statements by China’s senior officials on the sidelines of the ongoing 71st session of United Nations General Assembly in New York.
That can explain why India’s has sided with the US in the South China Sea disputes, as previously discussed here.
And things could turn worse, if pro-Indian forces in Pakistan sabotage China’s CEPC route. :biggrin2::biggrin2::biggrin2:
That raises the possibility of an open confrontation between China and Pakistan on the one side, and India and its allies on the other.
Is China ready for this scenario? Probably not. That’s why Beijing should either appease New Delhi or forget about CEPC altogether.
www.forbes.com/sites/panosmourdoukoutas/2016/11/16/china-should-either-make-peace-with-india-or-forget-about-cpec/
Last edited:
AmoghaVarsha
Senior Member
- Joined
- Oct 4, 2016
- Messages
- 1,372
- Likes
- 2,093
Who are Indias allies?China Should Either Make Peace With India Or Forget About CPEC : Forbes
China desperately needs the China-Pakistan Economic Corridor (CPEC). It’s part of that nation’s vision to write the rules of the next stage of globalization and help its export and investment engines grow for years to come—a good prospect for investors in Chinese equities, which have been lagging behind of those of neighboring India.
Specifically, CPEC is the express link between Western China, the Middle East, and Africa–China’s second continent. Ideologically that is, which can explain why Beijing has committed $46 billion to the project.
The trouble is that CPEC passes through Pakistani regions claimed by India. That makes it a bumpy road, to say the least — Pakistan and India continue to fight for control of these regions.
That’s why China needs to make peace with India.
So far, China has done very little to appease India. In fact, it has done quite the opposite: repeatedly blocking India’s efforts to join the Nuclear Supplier Group (NSG).
And it has sided openly with Pakistan in the India-Pakistan Kashmir standoff, as evidenced by statements by China’s senior officials on the sidelines of the ongoing 71st session of United Nations General Assembly in New York.
That can explain why India’s has sided with the US in the South China Sea disputes, as previously discussed here.
And things could turn worse, if pro-Indian forces in Pakistan sabotage China’s CEPC route.
That raises the possibility of an open confrontation between China and Pakistan on the one side, and India and its allies on the other.
Is China ready for this scenario? Probably not. That’s why Beijing should either appease New Delhi or forget about CEPC altogether.
www.forbes.com/sites/panosmourdoukoutas/2016/11/16/china-should-either-make-peace-with-india-or-forget-about-cpec/
30 characters.
Mikesingh
Professional
- Joined
- Sep 7, 2015
- Messages
- 7,353
- Likes
- 30,450
republic_roi97
Senior Member
- Joined
- Sep 12, 2016
- Messages
- 1,960
- Likes
- 2,700
WTF ??? Am i missing something ?
republic_roi97
Senior Member
- Joined
- Sep 12, 2016
- Messages
- 1,960
- Likes
- 2,700
...........................................................
Japan too
AmoghaVarsha
Senior Member
- Joined
- Oct 4, 2016
- Messages
- 1,372
- Likes
- 2,093
Hardly allies.But if Japan invests in Chabahar then we can talk about such an axis.
