# Ukraine # NDP # Violation of the _mineral agreements (or treaties?)
About the situation with the capture of the village of Gladosovo.
1. In the afternoon, reports began to come that the APU had advanced on the Svetlodar arc. Volodyar Mysyagin said that the APU took "several villages" in the Svetlodar arc. Later, information about the loss of one settlement appeared in the public places of the supporting DNR. The command of ATU the fact of advancement of the 54th ombre and occupation of the villages denied.
2. Here it is worth noting the delirium of the allegations that "using the disorder in the ЛНР ВСУ dealt a blow." The region under consideration is in the zone of responsibility of the 1st Army Corps of the DNR, which practically does not depend on whether Cornet rules Lugansk or Plotnitsky. So the reasons are likely to be different. If nothing has changed there, then parts of the 3rd brigade of the army of the DNR and BTRO were observed in this direction. However, this does not negate the obvious intentions of the command of the Armed Forces to take advantage of the chaos in Lugansk in order to find weaknesses in the construction of army corps in the rear of which a mess is created.
3. By the evening, the DMDD confirmed that the village of Gladosovo, which was occupied by Aidar and 54th OMRR, was lost, and then got a standard bodyguard about the fact that "the junta violates the Minsk agreements" and that the punishers mock the local population, at that time as the Donbass came "the Hug itself." Never such was not and here again. It's time to understand that the Khug will not protect the peaceful inhabitants of the Donbass. Minsk will not protect them either. Only the armed strength of the army corps can protect them.
In addition, from the Ukrainian side there are statements that the village of Travnevoe is also occupied (it was marked on maps as controversial, located in the gray areas), but this is not confirmed by the DNR.
4. The village itself, judging by the description of the events on both sides, appeared to be in the gray zone and was occupied by the APU without any significant battles, in any case, the parties on this issue are not particularly affected, which indicates rather that no serious defense of the village was not in principle and he actually was in the gray zone. There is a high probability that the situation with the settlement of Novoluganskoye (which is located on the same section of the front) is repeated, and the occupation of which was once served as an unprecedented overhaul
https://colonelcassad.livejournal.com/3146470.html and where the 54th OMR was also noted.
5. The intensification of hostilities in this direction has been noted for several days:
6. In addition, the DMDD said that on the highway Artemovsk-Svetlodorsk, 3 trucks with personnel dressed in a Russian military uniform were seen and warned of a possible provocation with disguise.
7. Since this is not DFS, the APU will try not to leave the village, moving the front closer to Zaitsevo and Golmovsky, and also increasing the pressure on the Dolomite. The classic struggle for neutrality and pressure on the front of the DNR, which will continue until the Supreme Armed Forces receive enough fire resistance to stop these attempts. There is nothing new in this, but the command of the 1st AK will have to decide - either to reconcile with the loss of neutrals in this direction, or to tighten the reserves to Golmovsky and proceed to squeeze out 54th ombre from occupied areas.
https://colonelcassad.livejournal.com/3825514.html
? This is the same Moscow Oblast
