Chinese Airlines banned from EU if they don't pay Carbon Tax

Armand2REP

CHINI EXPERT
Senior Member
Joined
Dec 17, 2009
Messages
13,811
Likes
6,734
Country flag
Top China airlines to ignore EU carbon tax, body says



China's biggest airlines will not pay a new European Union tax aimed at cutting carbon emissions, their trade body has said.

On 1 January, the EU brought airlines under its Emissions Trading Scheme (ETS), which levies a charge on flights based on their carbon emissions. Chai Haibo of the China Air Transport Association said that its members would not co-operate with the ETS.
However, the EU said it would not back down if the airlines refused to comply.

DisputeThe China Air Transport Association (CATA) represents companies including Air China, China Southern Airlines, China Eastern Airlines and Hainan Airlines.

Airlines which do not comply with the new EU tax can be fined and even prohibited from flying into the region.
Last year, it was claimed the plan could cost Chinese airlines 95m euros ($124m, £79m) in extra annual costs.

BBC News - Top China airlines to ignore EU carbon tax, body says
 

kickok1975

Senior Member
Joined
Aug 9, 2009
Messages
1,539
Likes
350
Europe sucks. Not only China, but the whole world against this so called "carbon tax". This is a welfare continent with mountain high debt and some of the most complacent people in the world. Instead of hypocrite,Europe should focus on fixing its problem no longer live on debt year after year to sink world together with them.
 

HeinzGud

Senior Member
Joined
Nov 26, 2011
Messages
2,558
Likes
1,070
Country flag
No fair Chinese dude......... they do concern about the environment. Don't you know that EU people buy cars by checking it's carbon foot print. There fore be more nature friendly and support the EU effort!
 

trackwhack

Senior Member
Joined
Jul 20, 2011
Messages
3,757
Likes
2,590
Europe sucks. Not only China, but the whole world against this so called "carbon tax". This is a welfare continent with mountain high debt and some of the most complacent people in the world. Instead of hypocrite,Europe should focus on fixing its problem no longer live on debt year after year to sink world together with them.
Whats stopping China from implementing a similar tax. It should nullify the effect. There are more European Airlines that operate in China than Chinese airlines that operate in Europe.
 

kickok1975

Senior Member
Joined
Aug 9, 2009
Messages
1,539
Likes
350
It has nothing to do with emission, the planes are there and emission is there. Who can afford replace all his fleet with Boeing 787? It's just an unilateral way for Europe to grab cash from pockets of rest of the world.
 
Last edited:

Armand2REP

CHINI EXPERT
Senior Member
Joined
Dec 17, 2009
Messages
13,811
Likes
6,734
Country flag
Every Euro airline has to comply with the same regulations. If you want to reverse the tax, fly more efficient aircraft. You can actually get credits in surplus and sell them to other airlines. Should help speed up purchases of A320NEO and 737MAX.
 

trackwhack

Senior Member
Joined
Jul 20, 2011
Messages
3,757
Likes
2,590
It has nothing to do with emission, the planes are there and emission is there. Who can afford replace all his fleet with Boeing 787? It's just an ulilateral way for Europe to grab cash from pockets of rest of the world.
Kickok, I see what you are saying but my point is that others come up with their own framework. The Europeans have set a standard, China can set a standard that even the 787 or the latest airbuses cannot clear. Only tit for tat works with these mongrels.

Every Euro airline has to comply with the same regulations. If you want to reverse the tax, fly more efficient aircraft. You can actually get credits in surplus and sell them to other airlines. Should help speed up purchases of A320NEO and 737MAX.
The truth emerges, the tax is to maintain Airbus and Boeing dominance, now that its being threatened by Emerging market aircraft makers. :)
 
Last edited:

RedDragon

Regular Member
Joined
Jan 29, 2011
Messages
536
Likes
69
Let's see if there are any real actions. And perhaps some tit for tat will happen.
 

Armand2REP

CHINI EXPERT
Senior Member
Joined
Dec 17, 2009
Messages
13,811
Likes
6,734
Country flag
The truth emerges, the tax is to maintain Airbus and Boeing dominance, now that its being threatened by Emerging market aircraft makers. :)
If it was to maintain Boeing dominance then the US wouldn't be complaining.
 

indian_sukhoi

Regular Member
Joined
Apr 6, 2009
Messages
957
Likes
230
Lets Hope the whole world follows the same way collecting $$ for the sake of the environment!! :p
 

Ray

The Chairman
Professional
Joined
Apr 17, 2009
Messages
43,132
Likes
23,835
Well, if one has to fly their aircraft to Europe, then they will have to pay.

They can get away with it since a whole lot of passengers and airlines fly to Europe and the US.

The traffic is not that heavy elsewhere in the world.
 

LTE-TDD

Regular Member
Joined
Aug 1, 2011
Messages
211
Likes
20
China, India Mount Opposition Against EU Aviation Carbon Curbs

The European Union faced increased pressure to scale down its plan to impose carbon curbs on airlines after China's carriers said they won't comply with the rules and India signaled it may attempt to scupper the EU plan.
Europe should either scrap or delay its initiative to include flights to and from the region's airports in its emissions trading system as of this year, according to the ChinaAir Transport Association, or CATA. India may ask airlines to withhold emissions data, a civil aviation ministry official said, a move that would undermine the first expansion of the EU carbon cap-and-trade program beyond its borders.
"What we need to do now is co-operate together and pressure them to scrap this," Chai Haibo, vice secretary general of Beijing-based CATA, said in a phone interview. Members of the association include Air China Ltd., China Southern Airlines Co. and China Eastern Airlines Corp.
The warnings by China and India follow a declaration adopted in November by the United Nations' International Civil Aviation Organization calling on the EU to exempt international aircraft operators from its curbs on carbon. The non-binding ICAO statement was supported by 26 countries, including the U.S., Russia and Japan, who said that the expansion of the EU program was inconsistent with international law.
The EU, which wants to lead the global fight againstclimate change, decided that aviation should become a part of its carbon program after airline discharges in Europe doubled over two decades and international organizations failed to enact emission curbs.
[h=2]European Limits[/h]Started in 2005, the European emissions trading system, known also as the EU ETS, imposes pollution quotas on more than 11,000 utilities and manufacturers. Emitters that produce less carbon dioxide than their quota can sell surplus allowances, and those exceeding their limits must buy additional permits or pay a fine of 100 euros per ton of CO2.
The European Commission, the 27-nation bloc's regulatory arm, has repeatedly said that while its preferred choice is a worldwide solution to cut greenhouse gases from aviation, it won't give up the expansion of the ETS to cover airlines. The EU law offers a possibility of exempting incoming flights from a particular country if that nation implements equivalent measures to cut pollution from its air transport sector.
EU law envisages penalties in case an operator doesn't comply with the rules and foresees the possibility of imposing an operating ban on an airline if it persistently fails to meet its legal obligations, said Isaac Valero-Ladron, climate spokesman for the commission.
"We hope, however, that this very last resort will never need to be applied," he said today by e-mail.
[h=2]'Actions Are Unilateral'[/h]"Europe's actions are unilateral," Chai said. "Measures to tackle emission control should be decided as an industry globally, and not just by one party alone. It's not right for one party to insist on charges."
The Indian government hasn't yet decided whether to proceed with the plan because of concerns about the possible impact on transportation, said the civil aviation ministry official, who declined to be identified because the discussions are private. Carriers aren't required to provide environmental information under the bilateral pacts with EU members that govern India-Europe flight rights, he said.
P.K. Mohanty, a spokesman at the civil aviation ministry, declined to comment. Only three Indian carriers, state-owned Air India Ltd., Jet Airways (India) Ltd. (JETIN), the nation's biggest, andKingfisher Airlines Ltd. (KAIR) operate services to Europe.
The EU Court of Justice on Dec. 21 ruled that international airlines must comply with the EU carbon limits in a lawsuit filed by United Continental Holdings Inc. (UAL), AMR Corp. (AMR)'s American Airlines and the Air Transport Association of America.
U.S. Prohibition
The ruling followed a bill passed by the U.S. House of Representatives in November prohibiting the country's airlines from participating in the ETS after the industry estimated that participation in the system would cost U.S. airlines $3.1 billion from 2012 to 2020. The measure needs backing from the Senate and President Barack Obama to become law.
Last month, the U.S. Department of Transportation asked U.S. carriers to provide information on the impact of the ETS.
International carriers will be given emission permits making up 85 percent of the industry cap in 2012 and will have to buy the remaining 15 percent at auction. EU permits for delivery in December rose 1.1 percent to 6.67 euros as of 11:56 a.m. on the ICE Futures Europe exchange in London, down 55 percent from a year ago.
To contact Bloomberg News staff for this story: Karthikeyan Sundaram in New Delhi at [email protected]; Ewa Krukowska in Brussels at [email protected]; Liza Lin in Shanghai at [email protected]
To contact the editors responsible for this story: Neil Denslow at [email protected]; Stephen Voss at [email protected]
 

redragon

Regular Member
Joined
Sep 20, 2009
Messages
956
Likes
58
Country flag
Lazy ass european lost ability to rob money from other countries, their days have passed, so they have to play dirty trick to grab any little money they can, pathetic.

They don't deserve their standard of living, when it come lower, you will see a total chaos. Not to mention, the whites will soon to be minority.
 

Armand2REP

CHINI EXPERT
Senior Member
Joined
Dec 17, 2009
Messages
13,811
Likes
6,734
Country flag
We have the right to protect our air quality. It is hard for you to understand when you live in this...

 
Last edited by a moderator:

asianobserve

Tihar Jail
Banned
Joined
May 5, 2011
Messages
12,846
Likes
8,556
Country flag
But this may hurt EU tourism as this is bound to jack up airline prices.
 

Latest Replies

Global Defence

New threads

Articles

Top