CHINA's Domestic Aircraft Carrier Design...

black eagle

Senior Member
Joined
Nov 22, 2009
Messages
1,237
Likes
130
Country flag
The following pics are said to be china's design for aircraft carriers....















 

Armand2REP

CHINI EXPERT
Senior Member
Joined
Dec 17, 2009
Messages
13,811
Likes
6,734
Country flag
We all know what their first carrier will be... carbon copy (to the best of ability) of the Varyag.
 

Yatharth Singh

Knowledge is power.
Regular Member
Joined
Apr 23, 2010
Messages
744
Likes
176
Country flag
Carbon copy? As far as I know, they have acquired that incomplete AC and are rebuilding the same.
 

Tshering22

Sikkimese Saber
Senior Member
Joined
Aug 20, 2010
Messages
7,869
Likes
23,242
Country flag
I don't understand why the heck is everything future of Chinese completely stuffed in secrecy. Seriously! Whether it is JXX, aircraft carriers, future aircraft, tanks, guns or whatever, what do they achieve by secrecy of such projects? Every big player has carriers around the world in the prominent group of countries. What does CCP aim to attain with secrecy? That it can transform into a space ship and fly at the speed of light?

Same with JXX. It wouldn't cause the collapse of CCP if they showed a clear still picture--just 1 picture of the actual JXX rather than asking their 50-Cent propaganda party to make Photoshop images and keep everyone guessing.
 

kickok1975

Senior Member
Joined
Aug 9, 2009
Messages
1,539
Likes
350
I don't understand why the heck is everything future of Chinese completely stuffed in secrecy. Seriously! Whether it is JXX, aircraft carriers, future aircraft, tanks, guns or whatever, what do they achieve by secrecy of such projects? Every big player has carriers around the world in the prominent group of countries. What does CCP aim to attain with secrecy? That it can transform into a space ship and fly at the speed of light?

Same with JXX. It wouldn't cause the collapse of CCP if they showed a clear still picture--just 1 picture of the actual JXX rather than asking their 50-Cent propaganda party to make Photoshop images and keep everyone guessing.
Sun Tzu once said "国之利器,不可示之于人"。That means a nation should alway hide its powerful weapons and never show to others. I guess CCP is following his advice.
 

badguy2000

Respected Member
Senior Member
Joined
May 20, 2009
Messages
5,133
Likes
746
it is wise to build 3 ACs ,but it is stupid to build over 3 ACs.

Nuke subs, instead of AC, would be the decisive force in the coming sea wars among USA,Russia and CHina.

in such a war, AC would be just sitting ducks and be destroyed soon after war were to break out.
 

Oracle

New Member
Joined
Mar 31, 2010
Messages
8,120
Likes
1,566
Is it a new AC or is it the Varyag in modification guys?
 

kickok1975

Senior Member
Joined
Aug 9, 2009
Messages
1,539
Likes
350
Is it a new AC or is it the Varyag in modification guys?
No ideal, nobody knows what it would look like until its on water or on CCTV news report. Let's wait to see. I guess the first generation in next 5 years will be 50K~60K tons conventional AC and second generation will go Nuclear in next 10 years, it would be more than 70K tons.
 

Kunal Biswas

Member of the Year 2011
Ambassador
Joined
May 26, 2010
Messages
31,122
Likes
41,042
in such a war, AC would be just sitting ducks and be destroyed soon after war were to break out.


AC is not a sitting duck specially when talking abt PLAN, You have a edge in china sea and Pacific :)

You see your AC or CV are protected by other vessels same as IN & US do..

Every vessel have its duty, besides all these u have a silver bullet ( carrier killer ) or its just a myth :)

Under the cover of carrier killer your CV are safe with other vessels, also the Su-30-copycats do have a range of Su-30 ( 3000km ), further your navy already have 1500km air-launch Cruise missiles and can be mounted under Su-copycats :)..

So, r u that vulnerable are pretending to be? :)
 

Yatharth Singh

Knowledge is power.
Regular Member
Joined
Apr 23, 2010
Messages
744
Likes
176
Country flag
it is wise to build 3 ACs ,but it is stupid to build over 3 ACs.

Nuke subs, instead of AC, would be the decisive force in the coming sea wars among USA,Russia and CHina.

in such a war, AC would be just sitting ducks and be destroyed soon after war were to break out.
Oh really. AC WILL BE A SITTING DUCK. What the hell!
It purely displays your knowledge restricted to economics only.
AC is the most strongest and highly protected vessel in an entire fleet because of its rare no. and importance and with modern capabilities AC is as deadly as a combination of destroyer, and a cruiser.

About your nuke sub idea, let me tell you dear that in the sea warfare, navy usually do not have to tackle a face to face vessels fighting against each other. The entire fleet will pass below your nose unnoticed.(oceans are very vast you know;;D)

Keep this in mind that when an AC leaves the port then it automatically becomes the tactical naval base for the friendlies and also the center of command so surely it aint a sitting duck and with the frigates guarding it, there is no chance for a sub to bang an AC.
 
Last edited:

Latest Replies

Global Defence

New threads

Articles

Top