If life is a waste of time and time is a waste of life, lets all get wasted and have the time of our lives.
But you don't need to waste time on trying to convince any chinese to believe your reasons, no matter they mainland or overseas born.
No, it has not applied to India as yet.
It has been too transparent.
It is time that the Govt of India wakes up and learn a few tricks from the Chinese.
Of course, when India initiated thirld war against Pak, it was for peace.
When India sent army into SriLankan, it was for peace.
When Indian prime minister was assassinated, that is his reward for "peace".
India does not want Tibet. I don't know from where you get that idea.
India may doesn't want Tibet to be part of it, but it absolutely want tibet to be under its influence.
If it did, then India should have done it in the 1950s, when the US wanted India to do it and when China was busy fighting the UN in Korea with it total military might committed there.
It didn't in 1950s doesn't mean it doesn't want it in 2010s.
At best, India would prefer that Tibet belongs to Tibetans and its acts as a buffer between India and China. Maybe then our relationship would be excellent since none would have to bother about each others intentions.
You are underestimate tibet's importance to China.
Our minorities rights are not trampled under any circumstances.
Maybe this will help:
Madani is one of the head of the Deoband, he is a Member of Parliament and very aggressive when defending the rights of the Muslim and very anti Govt.
Obviously, the people in insurgent group think that is not enough. They would rather risk their lives in military fighting than arguing in parliament.
It would be a daydream that China will grab more.
Isn't the smack that the small island of Japan gave China over the islands not an adequate reminder that these days it is not the 1950s and 60s?
One must smell the coffee, before one lets jingoism seize his senses.
And conveniently your forget when India showed China her place at Nathu La, Chola and Sumdorong Chu.
Selective amnesia?
Did we talk about "past"? I think we are talking about "future change". Looks like somebody should wake up.
But one is thunderstruck at the Chinese doublespeak of 'Peace' and then backstab!!
Please name me any war that China fight since 1996.
India has done nothing to upset the balance with Uyghurs or Tibetan.
In fact, India has no connection with the Uyghurs. Their leader is in the US.
And Dalai Lama has been restrained beyond all expectations.
So, hosting a large amount of tibeten lama within india border is nothing?
Traing a group of army of tibeten soldier is nothing?
Of course, if some tibetens cross the border and kill someone, that is not india's problem. Dalai Lama was restrained very well with india.
If your repression of ethnic minorities cause you problems, then don't go fishing for excuses to cover up your repression.
Did i say China has no problem with its minority?
Pakistan is up to the highest bidder.
It is a question of cash and carry and nothing to do with Muslim.
Note the way they are allowing their own people to be bombed to Kingdom Come by the US. Money talks there.
They are so cash strapped that they will sell their soul to the Devil if need be or are already doing so. Note how they pretend to be the Champions of Islam and yet they are silent over the Uyghur issue? Why? Because China keeps them militarily afloat as also gives them a psychological safety belt, even when history shows that in a war, China has given pious platitudes in torrents and nothing beyond
Oh, please! The problem between india and pak was already there even before china came in. They didn't sell anything. What they want is the resource to confront with india. And that is exactly what china want them to do.
US is not only willing to it, but is already at it. Rebiya Kadeer is well ensconced in the US. And she is not there to see the Grand Canyon either!
Maybe as india did to Dalai Lama, "restrain" her!
Checked the Turkish papers?
Muslim nations have been muted? Guess what would happen if they responded beyond the bleat? The free goodies, the soft loans and the cheap goods that sustain them would vanish. Their Govts are pragmatic since they have to run their countries in their autocratic manner, even if their people are hostile.
However, check the Middle East now. The scenario is changing.
So Turkish represents every muslim countries? How many muslim countries do we have in this world?
Nothing to be ashamed about. India is not China that it can ruthlessly smash under the boot popular sentiments.
It was a political move to low key the issue since there are many Buddhists in India as also a large segment of the population are very supportive of the Tibetan cause.
The pro Chinese monasteries have been closed down and he is still not allowed to go to Sikkim!! Quid pro quo!
The Tibetans would have bayed for blood and may have moved into Tibet causing problems for the Indo China relationship, giving grounds to people like you that India is fomenting problems for China in Tibet.
Please tell me what is the result of this move? Did your police find anything to prove the allegation so far?
One is aware that the Hans are ruthless and so of course, you will turn the Tsang po red with blood. Tell us something new.
If the push comes to shove, India will be more than willing to show China its rightful place.
You can bet on that.
Yes, we know how brave india would be! Just as how you did to england? Non-violant movement?
