mahesh
Regular Member
- Joined
- Sep 6, 2010
- Messages
- 607
- Likes
- 476
hmmm you are just choosing to answer my last phrase.See you get moody again. Facts talk, feelings cry.
hmmm you are just choosing to answer my last phrase.See you get moody again. Facts talk, feelings cry.
More than France could ever dream of? Please... you are talking about the country that made the Concord's engines over 40 years ago which produced more thrust without afterburner than an AL-31F with it. Making engines that big is a waste of space and weight when you can make a smaller and more efficient aircraft with less. If France had need of that class of engine, it could easily make one. It is ancient tech to us.i dnt know why a french is concerned about this or indian
ws-10 and ws-15 category engines are nt ever developed by france/india..neither have any plan
nor can they
than why talk about others?
the ws-10 engine max thrust is 132kn.much more than anything france can ever dream of.
and they should forgot about developing anything close to ws-15(180kn) for the next 2-3 decades
+1if metallurgy is the case then india has an upperhand because he have a lot of steel, but production ethics are better with the you guys
Facts talk, feelings cry, and idiotic Chinese trolls get smacked in the ass when they try to act too smart.See you get moody again. Facts talk, feelings cry.
China produced more steel than the combination of the entire rest world, and almost 15x of that of india, and 10x of that of US of A
50%+ of the world top material science journal papers were written by Chinese scientists/engineers as well.
China also control 90%+ of the world rare materials productions as of now.
So stop making any comparison when there is ABSOULATE NO Comparison here
We also produce most of other heavy industry goods that comparable to the output of the combination of the entire rest world now, no wonder China is the only true superpower, and about to be the hypepower
The main criteria in engine is how much thrust you produce for the weight of the engine,not simple plain thrust figure and how fast the full military thrust is reached?Check world top material science journal like ACTA materialia: Now 1/2 to as much as 2/3 of the top material science journal papers are written by Chinese (first author of the paper), never group China with India as if they were comparable.
Do you know the value of zero? in mathematical terms and no branch of physics or mathematics would have been possible without the indian number system?as if you invented anything as indian.
Chinese invented compass, gun powder, paper making, type printing, paper currency, tooth brush, abacus, binary system, decimal calculation, ratio of circumference, lunar calendar, paint, crossbow, pound lock, umbrella , kite, the first rocket, the first movie, the first magnetic driven machine, the first mail service, folded fan, watermills, windmills.. list goes on. Rice cultivation and Tea Planting are now supporting millions of families in India. You have more than one flashdrives in your drawers, well, you are welcome.
Indian invented 0 (of course I am saying it in a positive way).
i dnt know why a french is concerned about this or indian
ws-10 and ws-15 category engines are nt ever developed by france/india..neither have any plan
nor can they
than why talk about others?
the ws-10 engine max thrust is 132kn.much more than anything france can ever dream of.
and they should forgot about developing anything close to ws-15(180kn) for the next 2-3 decades
This is the reality behind the bluster.The J-15 is reported to use different avionics and systems than the Su-33, and uses Chinese-developed technologies, and features various upgrades such as AESA radar, radar absorbent material, MAWS, IRST, composite, and new electronics.[15]
China Signpost believes the J-15 "likely exceeds or matches the aerodynamic capabilities of virtually all fighter aircraft currently operated by regional militaries, with the exception of the U.S. F-22 Raptor"[16], alleging that the J-15 possesses a 10% superior thrust to weight ratio and a 25% lower wing loading than the F/A-18E/F Super Hornet[16].
However, Hu Siyuan of the National Defense University PLA China has said that "the current weak point of the J-15 is its Russia-made Al-31 engines which are less powerful than that of the American F-35 fighter".[17]
So it is no where near the french tech on rafale.According to an interview publicised in January 2007 with J-10 pilot Li Cunbao (æŽå˜å®), the J-10 had not yet been equipped with the domestic WS-10 engine, because although the WS-10 could match the performance of its Russian counterpart (the AL-31), there was a serious drawback; the WS-10 took longer to "spool up", i.e. there was a delay in reaching the same thrust output as the Russian engine.
WS-10A is reported to have 13,200 kilograms (29,000 lb) of thrust and a 7.5:1 thrust-to-weight ratio, making it comparable to the AL-31F turbofan. The WS-10A was first displayed in public at the 2008 Zhuhai Air Show.
you know how to end the discussion with your answering, but we know what does that meanSee you get moody again. Facts talk, feelings cry.
From 624th Institute, developing cores ranging from 5 to 35kg/s, engine thrust from 200 to 20000kgf. With more than 10 domestic engines under development including: Qingcheng (WS500 for cruise missile/UAV), Huanglong (turbojet also for missile/UAV), Minjiang, Minshan (Low thrust w/AB for L15), Jiuzhai, E'mei (WS15), Yellow Mountain, Yellow River, Everest, Chiyan.
Minjiang (medium thrust high B/P ratio, domestic CF34) and Yellow River (high thrust high B/P ratio for Y20) are named after rivers there are high by pass ratio engines.
Development of all these engines started in or before 2008.