China: Decoding 'String of Pearls'

SHASH2K2

New Member
Joined
May 10, 2010
Messages
5,711
Likes
730
An intresting article about Burma trying to play neutral role .

Chinese Whispers: The Great Coco Island Mystery



How a single news agency report led to the accepted belief that China has a sophisticated intelligence post in Burmese waters
For almost 15 years, there has been a steady stream of newspaper stories, scholarly monographs and books that have referred inter alia to a large Chinese signals intelligence (SIGINT) station on Burma's Great Coco Island, in the Andaman Sea. Yet it would now appear that there is no such base on this island, nor ever has been. The explosion of this myth highlights the dearth of reliable information about strategic developments in Burma since the creation of the State Law and Order Restoration Council (SLORC) in 1988.
The Great Coco Island mystery seems to stem from a report issued by the Kyodo News Agency on September 17, 1992. Citing diplomatic sources in Beijing, Kyodo claimed that China was building a radar facility on Burma's Coco islands, under a secret agreement with the SLORC. The Kyodo report was picked up by Reuters the next day, and repeated in the US newspaper The Estimate the following week. From there, the story quickly found its way into a wide range of newspapers and military journals.
Questioned about the Kyodo report, the Chinese Foreign Ministry flatly denied it. When asked to make a comment, the SLORC declined either to confirm or deny the report. On October 22, 1992, however, The Estimate published a follow-up story citing a "highly-placed, knowledgeable US military source," who stated that Chinese personnel had been seen on Hainggyi Island in the Irrawaddy delta, where another secret base was believed to be under construction. The Great Coco Island facility was mentioned in the same context.
From these small beginnings, the story grew rapidly. At first, the Great Coco Island base was reported to have a powerful optical telescope, capable of sighting India's Andaman Islands. Before long, the base was somehow transmogrified into a dedicated SIGINT collection station, operated by more than 70 Chinese military technicians, in partnership with the Burmese armed forces. By the mid-1990s, most newspapers and magazines were referring to a 50-meter antenna tower and a large radar facility on the island.
The Great Coco Island base has been described as "the most important Chinese electronic intelligence installation in Burma." Its main purpose was reportedly to monitor regional military activities, especially air and naval movements in the Bay of Bengal, and to conduct surveillance of India's strategically important tri-service facilities at Port Blair, on South Andaman Island. In a later elaboration of this theme, commentators suggested that the base was also equipped to analyze telemetry from Indian ballistic missile test flights.
Few of these reports gave sources to support their claims, other than quoting other newspaper stories. One or two authors, however, cited unnamed Western intelligence contacts. In one article, there was even a reference to satellite imagery, implying that at least one great power had confirmed the existence of the Chinese base, using national technical means. A prominent Indian analyst also claimed that there was "a fair amount of irrefutable evidence" about the Great Coco Island site, derived from human and signals intelligence.
As these reports proliferated, they were picked up by respected commentators and academics, and given fresh life in serious studies of the regional strategic environment. The Great Coco Island and Hainggyi Island bases were cited as evidence that Burma had become a client state of China. Other analysts saw these bases as proof of China's expansionist designs in the Indian Ocean region. Each time the reports were cited in books and reputable journals they gained credibility, and soon the existence of a large Chinese base on Great Coco Island was widely accepted as an established fact.
Throughout this entire period, Burma consistently denied that it had permitted China to establish any bases on its soil. The SLORC conceded that China was helping Burma to upgrade its civil and military infrastructure, but repeatedly stated that there was no Chinese facility on Great Coco Island. Beijing too issued formal denials, characterizing the story as a collection of unsubstantiated rumors. The Burmese government's reputation was so poor, however, that its denials were not believed. China's statements on the subject were also dismissed.
So persistent were Indian claims of Chinese bases in Burma, however, that they threatened to harm the relationship between Rangoon and New Delhi that began to gather pace in the late 1990s. In 1999, Burma's then powerful intelligence chief, Lt-Gen Khin Nyunt, invited the Indian defense attache in Rangoon to visit any place in the country where the attache believed Chinese forces were stationed, to verify the military regime's statements.
This invitation does not seem to have been taken up, but in a later attempt to settle India's concerns, the regime (known since 1997 as the State Peace and Development Council, or SPDC) apparently permitted India to conduct a surveillance flight over Great Coco Island, to see for itself that there was no Chinese SIGINT base there. It is difficult to imagine such a flight being permitted if the SPDC had anything important to hide.
Finally, in August 2005, India's chief of naval staff told reporters that he believed the Burmese when they said there was no Chinese presence in the Coco Islands. Two months later he stated categorically that India had "firm information that there is no listening post, radar or surveillance station belonging to the Chinese on Coco Islands."
It is conceivable that a small intelligence collection station once existed on Great Coco Island, but was then dismantled. The most likely explanation for India's remarkable about-face, however, is that there never was a Chinese SIGINT station there and most of the claims made since 1992 were completely baseless. If so, the question must be asked how this myth came to take such a firm grip on the imagination of so many journalists, scholars and government officials.
There was certain logic to the initial reports. China's defense ties with Burma developed rapidly after 1988, giving Beijing new opportunities to protect its strategic interests in the south. Viewed from this perspective, reports of a Chinese base on one of Burma's offshore islands were not surprising. China's historical concerns about India, and its interest in protecting its sea lines of communication to the Middle East, argued for an intelligence collection effort in the northern Indian Ocean region, even if Beijing did not enjoy such close relations with Rangoon.
Also, the journalists and scholars who wrote about this subject could be forgiven for thinking they were on solid ground. Senior members of the Indian security establishment were clearly convinced that the Chinese had established a major intelligence presence in the Andaman Sea. In Rangoon and New Delhi, Indian officials made repeated representations about this perceived challenge to India's national interests. In 1998 George Fernandez, then India's defense minister, publicly accused China of helping Burma install surveillance and communications equipment on Great Coco Island.
Yet warnings had been sounded by a few Burma-watchers. They pointed out Rangoon's sensitivity to any perceived challenges to its sovereignty, and the regime's continuing suspicions of China's long-term motives in the region. There was also a notable absence of firm evidence for the Chinese base. More importantly, perhaps, at no stage had the existence of the base been officially confirmed by any government other than India's, which was hardly an objective observer. This included the US, which had both an interest in China's activities in the Indian Ocean and the means to detect them.
The story of the Chinese SIGINT facility on Great Coco Island is perhaps best viewed as a cautionary tale. Accurate information about security developments in Burma has always been difficult to obtain, cloaked as these issues invariably are in official secrecy and confused by countless rumors. Burma will always have its fair share of mysteries but, if policy makers are not to be led astray, any analysis of its strategic environment must be grounded in hard facts, not based on myths and misconceptions.
 

amitkriit

Senior Member
Joined
Jul 17, 2009
Messages
2,463
Likes
1,927
And why would they do that?

We won't interfere with American shipping or that of any other country.
Actually there is some truth in the claim, USA won't allow India to take control of Indian Ocean using any pretext. Any blockade of Malacca Strait will be opposed by West. Besides, it will be quite difficult to screen China-bound ships. Major reason behind Japan-US war in 40s was control over sea-lanes. USA won't abandon China for India. In fact India is the smaller player.
 

Armand2REP

CHINI EXPERT
Senior Member
Joined
Dec 17, 2009
Messages
13,811
Likes
6,734
Country flag
And the West depends on China too much as well. That is why there is no serious trade war after so many years shouting.
The West can buy cheap crap from any developing country, there are plenty to pick up Chinese slack.
 

civfanatic

Retired
Ambassador
Joined
Sep 8, 2009
Messages
4,562
Likes
2,572
Actually there is some truth in the claim, USA won't allow India to take control of Indian Ocean using any pretext. Any blockade of Malacca Strait will be opposed by West. Besides, it will be quite difficult to screen China-bound ships. Major reason behind Japan-US war in 40s was control over sea-lanes. USA won't abandon China for India. In fact India is the smaller player.
Yes, I agree with your points.

But in light of the current Indo-US cooperation in the IOR, it *might* be possible for the US to allow the Indian Navy to exercise a fair degree of control over the region. India is a small player now but its clout will increase in the future, and the US might view India as the "regional stabilizer" for the IOR.

If you look at the broad, worldwide US foreign policy, you will see that is based on "regional stabilizers". Examples include Chile and Brazil in South America, Egypt in North Africa, and Saudi Arabia in Middle East. For a long time, the regional stabilizer for South Asia was Pakistan. But now, with Pakistan becoming the world's largest destabilzier, that status is starting to be conferred to India. This should be seen in light, again, of the improving Indo-US relations.
 

amoy

Senior Member
Joined
Jan 17, 2010
Messages
5,982
Likes
1,849
CHINA EXTENDS REACH IN S.ASIA WITH NEPAL AID DEAL
http://au.news.yahoo.com/world/a/-/world/9071600/china-extends-reach-in-s-asia-with-nepal-aid-deal/

AFP © Enlarge photo
KATHMANDU (AFP) - China's army chief wrapped up a high level visit to Nepal on Thursday, signing a new aid deal with Kathmandu's military that further cements ties between the two neighbours.

General Chen Bingde, chief of the general staff of China's People?s Liberation Army, arrived in Kathmandu on Wednesday for the first visit by a high-level Chinese military delegation in 10 years.

The 70-year-old signed two agreements with his Nepalese counterpart, General Chhatraman Singh Gurung, in which he announced 1.4 billion rupees (19 million dollars) worth of aid to the Nepalese army for infrastructure development.

Due to its strategic location, Nepal is often caught between Asia's two giants, India and China.

"The purpose of my visit is to strengthen friendship and cooperation between Nepal and China," Chen told reporters.

"This cooperation is not only conducive for our people but also for the world peace and the Asia Pacific region."

Chen, who led a 15-member delegation including the top security official from neighbouring Tibet, held talks with Nepal's President Ram Baran Yadav, Prime minister Jhalanath Khanal and Defence Minister Bishnu Paudel.

Analysts say while India has traditionally been the influential player in Nepal, China is making inroads in the Himalayan nation that is recovering after the end in 2006 of a decade-long civil war which killed 16,000 people.

"The Nepalese army is seen as the only strong state institution. This is why the Chinese are keen on investing in it," Sudheer Sharma, editor of Nepalese newspaper Kantipur told AFP.

"The former monarchy until its end in 2008 acted as an ally for the Chinese. With the monarchy gone, they are in a lookout for a trustworthy ally and Nepalese army could well be the one," he added.

China has also expanded its links with India's other neighbours, to the alarm of policymakers in New Delhi who see the moves as encroachment on their immediate sphere of influence in South Asia.

Beijing has historic ties with Pakistan, but has also begun building major infrastructure projects in Sri Lanka and Bangladesh.

Thursday marked the end of the official part of Chen's visit. He was due to leave Nepal on Friday after a sightseeing trip to the ancient city of Bhaktapur in the Kathmandu valley.


General Chen, who will lead a 15-member military delegation, will pay courtesy calls on President Dr Ram Baran Yadav, Prime Minister Jhala Nath Khanal and Defence Minister Bishnu Poudel. The PLA chief will hold bilateral talks with CoAS Gurung, and is expected to announce Rs 1.43 billion technical assistance to Nepali Army.

A part of it will be spent on upgrading the army hospital at Chhauni and for the purchase of heavy equipment for Directorate of Development and Construction of Nepali Army, a senior army officer said. Last year, the Chinese military had assisted the Nepali Army with 10 million yuans for communication and other equipment.

Chen's visit will be the highest level military visit from China since Chi Haotian, then vice-chairman of the Central Military Commission and Minister of National Defence, visited Kathmandu in 2001.

Meanwhile, Gen Gurung is all set to leave for the United States on a two-week visit beginning March 26. Army Spokesperson Ramindra Chhetri said Gurung will attend a special function of the US Army Command and General Staff College at Fort Leavenworth, Kansas, from where he obtained a graduate degree in 1986.
 
Last edited:

Global Defence

New threads

Articles

Top