Chengdu J-10 'Vigorous Dragon'

Payeng

Daku Mongol Singh
Senior Member
Joined
Mar 7, 2009
Messages
2,522
Likes
777
New J-10 variant sighted



Chinese web pages have featured photos of a new variant of the Chengdu Aircraft Corporation (CAC) J-10 multirole fighter that appear to confirm a spate of late December 2008 web reports on this same aircraft, with some accounts noting it has already been test flown.

This single-seat variant differs from the initial single-seat J-10 model in that it appears to feature a revised engine inlet, consistent in design with the diverter-less supersonic inlet (DSI) featured on the latest version of the Chengdu FC-1 lightweight multirole fighter. Reminiscent of the DSI modification first tested on a Lockheed Martin F-16 Block 30 in 1996, this modification saves weight and improves specific engine power and stealth. It also cleans up the J-10's previous complex inlet configuration, which was reportedly prone to vibration.

China's research on DSIs dates back to the late 1990s, with Chengdu's 611 institute for aerospace design having been assisted by government-funded research at the Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics.
Janes defense weekly
 

vijaytripoli

Regular Member
Joined
Mar 24, 2009
Messages
377
Likes
37
here the latest image of it

i got it from --- . they are taking it as a sukhoi killer.
chau

MOD EDIT - Please don't bring other forums here
 

A.V.

New Member
Joined
Feb 16, 2009
Messages
6,503
Likes
1,157
a fighter plane is good in its own right,j-10/fc20 can be a good plane but until it proves itself it is a no match for the flankers, which is a proven plane worldwide and used by 30 odd countries.
battles are not fought by adobe photoshop generated planes.which is most often the case for chinese planes.
 

ahmedsid

Top Gun
Senior Member
Joined
Feb 21, 2009
Messages
2,960
Likes
252
I think the J10 will be a much better plane than the JF17s But still Chinese warplanes have to go a long way to be able to sit alongside the Sukhois and Martins and others.
 

ZOOM

Founding Member
Regular Member
Joined
Feb 17, 2009
Messages
577
Likes
11
Serious Wake up call for IAF, better it should get its act in order by ramping up a production of LCA. Since even MRCA is not an answer for J-10B as their huge numbers will be a biggest constraint. Only large number of a LCA is the only answer.
 

Payeng

Daku Mongol Singh
Senior Member
Joined
Mar 7, 2009
Messages
2,522
Likes
777
Anybody who can through light on the aerodynamic performance of J-10? its airframe looks like that of the EF Typhoon but with a single engine and EF Typhoon is said to have a great aerodynamic performance.
 
Joined
Feb 16, 2009
Messages
29,885
Likes
48,598
Country flag
i got it from --- . they are taking it as a sukhoi killer.
chau

MOD EDIT - Please don't bring other forums here
Russians are not stupid to be supplying engines for a plane that will kill their sukhoi highly doubtful.
 

Payeng

Daku Mongol Singh
Senior Member
Joined
Mar 7, 2009
Messages
2,522
Likes
777
A Sukhoi killer with a Russian engine...lol
 

bengalraider

DFI Technocrat
Ambassador
Joined
Oct 10, 2009
Messages
3,779
Likes
2,666
Country flag
You can call it whatever you want --- it is the Lavi prototype.

Look care fully there is a design difference in the engine intakes of the lavi and the J-10S , which is not to say that the Chinese did not copy the LAVI we all know they did.
 

Koji

Regular Member
Joined
May 24, 2009
Messages
758
Likes
1
Look care fully there is a design difference in the engine intakes of the lavi and the J-10S , which is not to say that the Chinese did not copy the LAVI we all know they did.
The more correct term is bought.

The Director General of Israel's Ministry of Defense David Lari "acknowledged in an Associated Press interview that 'some technology on aircraft' had been sold to China and that some Israeli companies may not have 'clean hands'".
 

Latest Replies

Global Defence

New threads

Articles

Top