CBI Unconstitutional and Illegal: Gauhati High Court

Discussion in 'Politics & Society' started by afako, Nov 7, 2013.

  1. afako

    afako Regular Member

    Joined:
    Aug 18, 2010
    Messages:
    882
    Likes Received:
    654
    In a curious judgement, the Gauhati high court has struck down the resolution through which the Central Bureau of Investigation was set up and held all its actions as "unconstitutional". The judgement by the division bench, comprising justices I A Ansari and Indira Shah, came on a writ petition filed by one Navendra Kumar challenging an order by a single judge of the high court in 2007 on the resolution through which CBI was set up."We hereby...set aside and quash the impugned Resolution, dated April 1, 1963, whereby CBI has been constituted... We do hold that the CBI is neither an organ nor a part of the Delhi Special Police Establishment (DSPE) and the CBI cannot be treated as a 'police force' constituted under the DSPE Act, 1946," the court said. It further said the aforementioned home ministry resolution was "not the decision of the Union Cabinet nor were these executive instructions assented to by the President". "Therefore, the impugned Resolution...can, at best, be regarded as departmental instructions, which cannot be termed as 'law'," the judgement said.

    Gauhati high court declares CBI 'unconstitutional' - TOI Mobile | The Times of India Mobile Site

    http://zeenews.india.com/news/natio...tion-through-which-cbi-was-set-up_888493.html
     
    Last edited: Nov 7, 2013
    Rage and Sridhar like this.
  2.  
  3. Ray

    Ray The Chairman Defence Professionals Moderator

    Joined:
    Apr 17, 2009
    Messages:
    43,118
    Likes Received:
    23,545
    Location:
    Somewhere
    This has opened up a can of worms.

    The worms will spread all over to add to the unholy mess we already are in!
     
  4. Singh

    Singh Phat Cat Administrator

    Joined:
    Feb 23, 2009
    Messages:
    20,305
    Likes Received:
    8,270
    Location:
    011
    [​IMG]

    "Guwahati, Nov. 6: Gauhati High Court today ruled that the very process of setting up the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) was invalid.

    The high court said the country’s premier investigating agency was constituted through a resolution issued by the Union ministry of home affairs on April 1, 1963.

    A division bench comprising Justice Iqbal Ahmed Ansari and Justice Indira Shah today declared the creation of the CBI through the resolution, which was signed by then secretary to the Union government V. Viswanathan, as ultra vires.

    The court also set aside the impugned resolution. As a result of that, from today, the CBI ceased to be a constitutionally valid police force empowered to investigate crimes and all CBI cases have become void ab initio.

    The high court was of the view that a police force with powers to investigate crime cannot be constituted by merely issuing an executive order. For that purpose, an act shall have to be passed by the legislature, it added.

    Senior CBI officials tonight expressed disbelief over the high court’s ruling.

    “We are in a state of shock and awe. We have consulted our legal team and they have been asked to examine the judgement,” said a senior CBI official.

    According to him, the order seems to be “faulty” as so many CBI cases are being monitored by the Supreme Court at present and several high courts often ask the country’s investigative agency to probe cases. “How can it be so if the CBI is ultra vires?” the official asked.

    “It is surprising that while the Supreme Court wants to free us from bureaucratic clutches, Gauhati High Court wants us to pack our belongings,” he added.

    Today’s order was passed in connection with a writ appeal (number 119 of 2008) filed by Navendra Kumar. The CBI had registered a case against Kumar, an employee of Bharat Sanchar Nigam Limited (BSNL) in Assam, under Sections 120B (criminal conspiracy) and 420 IPC (cheating) in 2001.

    Following registration of the case, Kumar filed a writ petition (civil) (number 6877 of 2005) in the high court challenging the constitution of the CBI by claiming it as ultra vires and seeking quashing of the FIR registered against him by the CBI.

    Kumar’s writ petition was rejected by a single-judge bench of the high court, after which he filed the writ appeal before a division bench that passed the judgment today. The division bench also quashed the chargesheet filed by the CBI against Kumar and aborted his trial.

    On the Delhi Special Police Establishment (DSPE) Act, 1946, which governs the CBI, the high court said the investigating agency was neither an organ nor a part of the DSPE Act and it cannot be treated as a police force constituted under the act.

    Additional solicitor-general of India P.P. Malhotra appeared for the Centre and the CBI. Speaking to The Telegraph, Malhotra said the judgment was “totally erroneous” and the Centre would appeal in the apex court on November 11 after the vacation. Noted criminal lawyer Kamini Jaiswal said the “judgment is shocking and surprising” and “has to be set aside”.

    An official source said the CBI is likely to challenge the judgment in the Supreme Court.

    Other legal experts said the judgment cannot be countenanced by any other court as the CBI had been validly constituted under a parliamentary enactment and the apex court itself had in a number of judgments upheld the role of the CBI and the DSPE Act 1946, under which it was constituted.

    “The Centre must, and I think it will, be moving the apex court because the ruling that the very set up of CBI is void ab initio will have far-reaching implications. All the cases like the 2G scam, Coalgate and others in which the CBI had conducted investigation will become null and void if the order is not stayed,” Jaiswal said.

    Malhotra explained that the CBI has been set up with an act of Parliament. Tracing the history of the DSPE Act, he said initially it was set up through an ordinance by the British regime in 1942, post World War II, to curb corruption in the country.

    After Independence, the ordinance had become a law as per the Constitution, which says that all such legislation (British regime) will become law of the country unless it is inconsistent with the Constitution.

    “The apex court is bound to stay it, otherwise all cases before the agency will not have any validity,” noted constitutional expert Anil Divan said.

    Malhotra pointed out that the Supreme Court itself, in a series of judgments, had upheld the validity of the CBI and cited the Constitution Bench ruling in the 2010 judgment of West Bengal vs Organisation for Protection of Democratic Right (OPDR).

    In the said judgment on February 17, the apex court had ruled that constitutional courts (Supreme Court and high courts) can order a CBI investigation into a serious offence without the consent of the state government concerned but such “extraordinary power” must be used “sparingly, cautiously and in exceptional circumstances”.

    Further, the apex court in 1994 (Kazi Hendup Dorjee vs CBI), while interpreting the DSPE, had observed that “the act was enacted to make provision for the constitution of special police force in Delhi for the investigation of certain offences in the Union territories and for the superintendence and administration of the said force and for the extensions to other areas of the powers and jurisdiction of the members of the said force in regard to investigation of the said offence. DSPE under the said act is now known as the Central Bureau of Investigation.”
    "

    CBI’s genesis invalid: HC
     
    Rage and parijataka like this.
  5. Singh

    Singh Phat Cat Administrator

    Joined:
    Feb 23, 2009
    Messages:
    20,305
    Likes Received:
    8,270
    Location:
    011
    I don't think so. SC will step in, will quash Gauhati HC verdict, chastise the Judges and everybody will get on with it.
     
    parijataka and sayareakd like this.
  6. rock127

    rock127 Maulana Rockullah Senior Member

    Joined:
    Aug 12, 2009
    Messages:
    8,938
    Likes Received:
    10,290
    Location:
    India
    Just CBI? It would make sense if it says the current government is unconstitutional and illegal. :lol:
     
    parijataka and sayareakd like this.
  7. maomao

    maomao Veteran Hunter of Maleecha Senior Member

    Joined:
    Apr 7, 2010
    Messages:
    4,497
    Likes Received:
    4,142
    All government institutions have been reduced at being private pets by secular forces in this nation led by the con-party and their plundering cronies!
     
  8. pmaitra

    pmaitra Moderator Moderator

    Joined:
    Mar 10, 2009
    Messages:
    31,663
    Likes Received:
    17,158
    Location:
    EST, USA
    Have they officially changed the spelling of Guwahati to Gauhati or is it a different city?
     
  9. Ray

    Ray The Chairman Defence Professionals Moderator

    Joined:
    Apr 17, 2009
    Messages:
    43,118
    Likes Received:
    23,545
    Location:
    Somewhere
    SC has to step in since its own credibility is at stake where it has ordered a whole lot of Investigations to be done by the CBI on its behalf.

    Now, if the SC agrees that the verdict is right, then it will have egg on its face.

    Therefore, it is a fait accompli.

    But the debate shall continue!
     
  10. anoop_mig25

    anoop_mig25 Senior Member Senior Member

    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2009
    Messages:
    5,195
    Likes Received:
    2,223
    Point is whether Gauhati High Court judges are right in interpreting LAW.

    Experts at dfi please clarify
     
  11. Ray

    Ray The Chairman Defence Professionals Moderator

    Joined:
    Apr 17, 2009
    Messages:
    43,118
    Likes Received:
    23,545
    Location:
    Somewhere
  12. Ray

    Ray The Chairman Defence Professionals Moderator

    Joined:
    Apr 17, 2009
    Messages:
    43,118
    Likes Received:
    23,545
    Location:
    Somewhere
  13. Decklander

    Decklander New Member

    Joined:
    Nov 19, 2012
    Messages:
    2,654
    Likes Received:
    4,043
    Location:
    New Delhi
    CBI is closing in on MMS. This cud be an handiwork of Khangrass themselves to wriggle out and scuttle the investigation against its own.
     
    natarajan likes this.
  14. sayareakd

    sayareakd Moderator Moderator

    Joined:
    Feb 17, 2009
    Messages:
    15,625
    Likes Received:
    11,703
    99.99% chance that it will be stayed by the Hon'ble SC......................
     
  15. Decklander

    Decklander New Member

    Joined:
    Nov 19, 2012
    Messages:
    2,654
    Likes Received:
    4,043
    Location:
    New Delhi
    This act does not provide anywhere of setting up a subsidiery or parallel agency to investigate so CBI shud have been called DSPE agency. It appears that this time even SC will deliver a correct verdict as the present CJI is a clean man and not a puppet of congress.
     
  16. DivineHeretic

    DivineHeretic Senior Member Senior Member

    Joined:
    Jan 1, 2013
    Messages:
    1,050
    Likes Received:
    1,183
    Location:
    Assam
    Nope, Both are the same. Gauhati is the Assamese version of the name. But even we refer to it as Guwahati now.
     
    pmaitra likes this.
  17. sayareakd

    sayareakd Moderator Moderator

    Joined:
    Feb 17, 2009
    Messages:
    15,625
    Likes Received:
    11,703
    Gauhati HC order on CBI will have widespread ramification: Centre to SC
     
  18. sayareakd

    sayareakd Moderator Moderator

    Joined:
    Feb 17, 2009
    Messages:
    15,625
    Likes Received:
    11,703
    this is most interesting part

    Gauhati HC order on CBI will have widespread ramification: Centre to SC

    Looks like Navendra Kumar Counsel now have to reached CJI residence when matter will be mentioned.
     
  19. natarajan

    natarajan Senior Member Senior Member

    Joined:
    Jul 28, 2009
    Messages:
    2,592
    Likes Received:
    750
    Its handy work of conki and people can ever never imagine what the conki can do,great scientific looters
     
  20. Ray

    Ray The Chairman Defence Professionals Moderator

    Joined:
    Apr 17, 2009
    Messages:
    43,118
    Likes Received:
    23,545
    Location:
    Somewhere
    SC has stayed the order.

    Next hearing 6 dec.
     
    sayareakd and Rage like this.
  21. sayareakd

    sayareakd Moderator Moderator

    Joined:
    Feb 17, 2009
    Messages:
    15,625
    Likes Received:
    11,703
    Read more at: SC stays Gauhati HC verdict, CBI still constitutional | Firstpost
     

Share This Page