Britain is too precious for mankind to be allowed to be destroyed

Ray

The Chairman
Professional
Joined
Apr 17, 2009
Messages
43,132
Likes
23,834
A VALUABLE SITE
- Britain is too precious for mankind to be allowed to be destroyed


Sunanda K. Datta-Ray

As it clambered to First World glory, Singapore found it necessary to forbid eating dog meat. As Britain sinks into Third World slovenliness, an English council thinks it necessary to ban public spitting. Similarly imposing compulsion when instinct fails, the 560 British athletes at the London Olympics have been ordered not to sell their team kit.

Sociologists trace Britain's decline to the First World War when the flower of its youth perished in the mud of France and Flanders. The old order was irretrievably destroyed, as John Masters describes brilliantly in his trilogy, Now, God Be Thanked, Heart of War and By The Green of the Spring. The downhill slide ever since recalls Nani A. Palkhivala lamenting over a late-night whisky that he feared a country that had peaked once would never rise again. Palkhivala was speaking of India's aspirations. But despite A.L. Basham's Wonder, India as such was never a world power while, unbelievable as it may seem amidst current confusion and mismanagement when it's rare for a London bus to complete its scheduled journey, Britain ruled an empire on which the sun never set.

The decline makes little difference if you have affection for the eccentricities of food and accent beyond the impressive panoply of political ritual, ancient institutions and stately architecture, and if you are convinced that despite abuses, Clement Attlee's social security net is one of the finest achievements of any government anywhere. A caring State and the resonance of history provide wonderful camouflage as Britain celebrates Queen Elizabeth's jubilee with the Olympics to come. But the creaks of disrepair and cracks under the peeling paint are unmistakeable. Far from being rogue institutions, banks and the media symbolize this disintegration.

A neighbour in London complains that NatWest Bank insisted he had spent £3,500 on the credit card they hadn't sent him. When forced to recognize that he did not get the card, NatWest demanded interest on what it called its "loan" of £3,500. Barclays is secretive about the bonus to be paid to its immensely rich chief executive, Bob Diamond, whose emoluments are assessed at £11 million. But the bank hopes to escape a storm by reducing the total bonus pool by 25 per cent and capping individual bonuses at £65,000, which still leaves about £2.15 billion to be distributed. As for NatWest's owner, the Royal Bank of Scotland, it deserves an article to itself and will soon no doubt be the subject of a thriller.

The media which bring all this to light are now under the pitiless glare of a judicial inquiry: the hearings of the last 50 or so days convey the impression that not just Rupert Murdoch's empire (accused of tapping telephone lines, bribing policemen and senior bureaucrats and cosying up to the political elite) but the entire newspaper industry is on trial. But, then, apart from the News of the World, the crisis's first casualty, Murdoch owns The Times, The Sunday Times and The Sun. It's tempting to pin the blame on him as an Australian-born American citizen (another foreigner, the Egyptian billionaire, Mohammed al Fayed, is accused of hiring thugs to target the satirical magazine, Private Eye) but it must be remembered that what the News prints hasn't changed qualitatively since it was dubbed Screws of the World and proudly called "as English as roast beef and Yorkshire pudding".

No one knows what's afoot or where it will end. But hints of fierce infighting overlap witch-hunting charges. With several Sun journalists arrested and 170 policemen on the job, the State is suspected of attempting either a massive purge or a cover-up. Murdoch's overwhelming fear is said to be that the revelations in Britain might precipitate prosecution under the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act in the United States of America.

Whatever happens to him and his empire, the inquiry has demolished the myth that the media rise in lily-white purity above the dirty currents of daily life and enjoy a special mandate as well as power to ensure public morality and governmental integrity. The evidence confirms again that all professions — media, politics and the bureaucracy — draw their manpower from the same pool and suffer from the same failings. The so-called Fourth Estate reflects all that is wrong in a society whose members of parliament and peers lie about where they live to cheat the exchequer, public figures claim domicile abroad to evade taxes, nearly three million people are without jobs, the longevity gap between rich and poor is widening, and special cells ("drunk tanks") are planned to tackle alcoholism which costs the National Health Service nearly £3 billion annually. More than 5.5 million households face a stark choice this winter between heating and eating because of the pricing strategy of energy suppliers whose profit margin shows a 733 per cent rise.

Manmohan Singh, who grumbles about extravagance at the top, would be interested to know that when a trade union official was asked about exorbitant remuneration, he replied, "How do you shame people who are shameless?" A sense of shame encompasses personal and public responsibility and a social conscience. It isn't easily reconciled with a prominent banker, Nathaniel Rothschild, being accused of arranging a 25-hour visit to Siberia by Lord Mandelson, the former European Union trade commissioner, as guest of the Russian oligarch, Oleg Deripaska, to facilitate a £500 million business deal. Or with Christopher Huhne, David Cameron's energy secretary, facing the criminal charge of "perverting the course of justice" by lying that his wife was behind the wheel when he was caught speeding. At least, he quit. An East London councillor jailed for fraudulently claiming housing and council tax benefits, refused to give up her council seat. Shelina Akhtar is of Bangladeshi origin. Another ethnic Bangladeshi, Lutfur Rahman, mayor of a nearby borough that is one of London's poorest, pays a daily £1,000 to his "executive adviser".

Inevitably — and understandably — Britain's decline will be linked with this foreign presence. Lee Kuan Yew told Deng Xiaoping that China should race ahead of Singapore because the best people stayed back and only the riff-raff emigrated. Now, Britain says it wants only the "brightest and best" from abroad, but between an influential curry lobby, EU insistence on human rights, fake marriages, bent policemen and cost-cutting on security measures, I doubt if the authorities can do much. When we landed at Heathrow in early January, a faulty machine couldn't identify my wife's thumb impression; when we returned from Europe four weeks later, the machine at another counter had broken down altogether. Obliging immigration officers skipped the fingerprint test both times. It's the human factor that saves Britain, but for how long?

The haunting closing lines of Alan Bennett's Forty Years On, which I saw at a London theatre in 1968 or 1969, delivered in the head boy's (the play is set in the Albion House school) adolescent tones from a darkened stage, come to mind, "To let. A valuable site at the crossroads of the world. At present on offer to European clients. Outlying portions of the estate already disposed of to sitting tenants. Of some historical and period interest. Some alterations and improvements necessary."

I have never understood what happened to the European offer since no binding contract can have been sealed without Schengen visas and the euro. Perhaps The Best Exotic Marigold Hotel, starring Judy Dench, about a retirement home in Bangalore, points to the future. More than 5,000 people in India draw British State pensions. Malaysia's "My Second Home" programme and "The British Village in the Philippines" may be even more popular.

They are fine advertisements for globalization but the vacuum at home causes concern. Will those who fill it appreciate and retain the "historical and period interest" of which the head boy spoke? Will they carry out the necessary "alterations and improvements"? Britain is too precious for mankind to be allowed to be destroyed.

http://www.telegraphindia.com/1120218/jsp/opinion/story_15147103.jsp
A very incisive and interesting commentary on Britain.

What do you say?
 

pmaitra

Senior Member
Joined
Mar 10, 2009
Messages
33,262
Likes
19,593
A neighbour in London complains that NatWest Bank insisted he had spent £3,500 on the credit card they hadn't sent him.
Happened with my ex-colleague. He received a notice stating that he owed money to Citibank because he had used their credit card and not paid back. He never had a Citibank credit card.
 

sob

Mod
Joined
May 4, 2009
Messages
6,425
Likes
3,805
Country flag
Grew up reading Sunanda K Datta Ray in the Statesman. Based on a few isolated events he is drawing up a very dismal picture. We are seeing Britain at the low point of the Global economy, we should wait to see how they respond when the Global economy is on a upswing.
 

Ray

The Chairman
Professional
Joined
Apr 17, 2009
Messages
43,132
Likes
23,834
He is a senior from my school and a family friend!

Visit UK and Singapore regularly.
 
Last edited:

sky

Regular Member
Joined
Aug 12, 2009
Messages
340
Likes
25
I would quote Margaret Thatcher. "Socialism is a great idea till you run out of other people's money."
This is where we now find ourself's, we have not only run out of money but are borrowing more then 100 billion pound's a year just to pay our bills.

Our government say's it's cutting spending in all department's and still our national debt climbs ever higher. The labour party whose overspending got us where we are think we should borrow even more to kick start the economy .

You wouldn't run your family finances the way our government does it's ,so why keep spending other peoples money.

I'm glad i followed my mum's advice and spend only after i earn and only ever borrow if its for a house. over the long haul a house will rise in value so to borrow to buy is still worthwhile...
 

BangersAndMash

Regular Member
Joined
Apr 24, 2011
Messages
748
Likes
543
I'm not worried at all! Soon we will see Arjun tanks rolling down Pall Mall and the queen will be replaced by a Italian madam and the Brits will be put out of their misery!:namaste:
 

Armand2REP

CHINI EXPERT
Senior Member
Joined
Dec 17, 2009
Messages
13,811
Likes
6,734
Country flag
I'm not worried at all! Soon we will see Arjun tanks rolling down Pall Mall and the queen will be replaced by a Italian madam and the Brits will be put out of their misery!:namaste:
We already got the Italian madam and Indians parading down the Champs Elysee. Didn't end us, in fact we got MMRCA. :hail:
 

W.G.Ewald

Defence Professionals/ DFI member of 2
Professional
Joined
Sep 28, 2011
Messages
14,139
Likes
8,594
Perhaps The Best Exotic Marigold Hotel, starring Judy Dench, about a retirement home in Bangalore, points to the future. More than 5,000 people in India draw British State pensions. Malaysia's "My Second Home" programme and "The British Village in the Philippines" may be even more popular.
Has anyone on DFI seen that movie?

The Best Exotic Marigold Hotel (2011) - IMDb
 

Mad Indian

Proud Bigot
Senior Member
Joined
Jan 27, 2012
Messages
12,835
Likes
7,762
Country flag
This thread has so many useful posts. I will this thread in mind, next time some idiot talks about socialism.:truestory:

Anyway, lesson for the day for Indians, learn from Brits' mistake and stop this socialism in India:nod:
 

trackwhack

Senior Member
Joined
Jul 20, 2011
Messages
3,757
Likes
2,589
I would quote Margaret Thatcher. "Socialism is a great idea till you run out of other people's money."
Yes, ol miss maggie T was very wise indeed... :rolleyes:

as evidenced by world financials, it is unfortunately the capitalist west that has been living off others money and are soon running out of it. As evidenced by the debt that Europe and North America owe to the rest of the world!!
 

Mad Indian

Proud Bigot
Senior Member
Joined
Jan 27, 2012
Messages
12,835
Likes
7,762
Country flag
Yes, ol miss maggie T was very wise indeed... :rolleyes:

as evidenced by world financials, it is unfortunately the capitalist west that has been living off others money and are soon running out of it. As evidenced by the debt that Europe and North America owe to the rest of the world!!
India and china were socialist countries in the 17th and 18th centuries when their economies were at peak--->>>:truestory:
 

Son of Govinda

Regular Member
Joined
Apr 1, 2012
Messages
595
Likes
80
This thread has so many useful posts. I will this thread in mind, next time some idiot talks about socialism.:truestory:

Anyway, lesson for the day for Indians, learn from Brits' mistake and stop this socialism in India:nod:
And you think a hardline capitalist UK would fair any better? Do you have any idea how much corruption and usury there actually is in Laissez-faire?

If you're going to attack socialism at least come with something credible :)
 

Mad Indian

Proud Bigot
Senior Member
Joined
Jan 27, 2012
Messages
12,835
Likes
7,762
Country flag
And you think a hardline capitalist UK would fair any better? Do you have any idea how much corruption and usury there actually is in Laissez-faire?

If you're going to attack socialism at least come with something credible :)
I believe in center right economic policy.

What do you think is the reason for the UK/EU/Greece's fall?

Again, I am asking the same question, why did India did better before colonialism, when the economy was de-centralised(which is capitalist in practice)?

Socialism rewards mediocracy and capitalism rewards meritocracy. hence Capitalism is the best way forward. As Shakel said in another thread, Capitalism is like Democracy. It is shit but it is still the best bet among what is available.
 
Last edited:

Son of Govinda

Regular Member
Joined
Apr 1, 2012
Messages
595
Likes
80
I believe in center right economic policy.

What do you think is the reason for the UK/EU/Greece's fall?

Again, I am asking the same question, why did India did better before colonialism, when the economy was de-centralised(which is capitalist in practice)?

Socialism rewards mediocracy and capitalism rewards meritocracy. hence Capitalism is the best way forward. As Shakel said in another thread, Capitalism is like Democracy. It is shit but it is still the best bet.
Capitalism is meant to make the rich ever richer, and make the poor even poorer. If you think wealth in a capitalist society is the result of hard-work you need to take a much closer look at actual Laissez-faire that miserably failed Europe and led to things like Marxism.

Socialism gives the rich a chance to stay rich, and the poor a chance to get rich. If anything, socialism is the system that rewards hard work.
 

Latest Replies

Global Defence

New threads

Articles

Top