- Joined
- Apr 30, 2017
- Messages
- 173
- Likes
- 220
The thing is communism here and communism in China are very different and has been different for a long time.China being a hegemon have nothing to my point ,or may be that strengthen my point that China always live like a boss without facing any powerful cultural entity .
Chicoms are't nationalistic , it's hun leadership is . And Chini commie are confusi ? LOl they are CONpussie ....Chini commie are now dominating commie power , all other commie in the world now look towards beijing as their mekka , they are now new soviet for indian commies .
And by the way about nationalism , in China it's "partism". A country where army take oath to protect party can't be called a nationalistic . Just compare Chinese army with our cheep red Cadres , u will get similarities.
Trade can't enforce culture , I am not saying that CHinese are so fragile that cultural influence from trade would bring their culture down ,otherwise Chinese civilization would't even survive in their solitude. It about when they face cultural crisis ... How many times Chini face cultural crisis like us ?
CHina always a mystery , it's take around 5k-8k Km more journey to reach China than India , the distance was't joke millennia ago. And fact is chinese silk is low in quality but cheeper than Indian one , it's the reason that they are famous ,u also fail to mention that during Roman-Gupta era Indo-european trade was at peak , and we don't have substantial document how strong they are as both rome and India later face devastating cultural invasion .
Most of the silk-route bla bla was after 1000AD , India by then in ruins while the point I mention geographical solitude save chinese from same invasion .Most of the western european nations framework form by then so their was well documented trade within them.
And what science have to do with my point ,Before destruction of universities ours we have powerfull scientific and medical community . What happens after Bakthiayr and Khilji arrive ? China never face those ppl and thanks to their geographical position . ....science can't save u , even when mongol siege beijing , almost half a million died in starvation in besieged city ...they great catapult-crossbows can't save them that time .
Since commie cultural revolution expose their inexperience in countering terrorists , I really wonder what would happen if they face mass murderer same as India , may be they become stronger , but as it's did 't happen so no need to compare them with us as a culture who stand test of time against "all odds"
Lat point shows utter hypocrisy from ur side , Chinese doing this under commie regime ,where u commies here in India mocking us for not doing it and when our ppl try to resist commie control academics take "intolerance" stance....China would even survive it's cultural identity in similar governance like us.
The Chinese CCP came to power when the nation became independent.hence they were the owners of future China then.
The communists in India just did few struggles against British and we're always the minority in religious india.they we're always the minority in positions of power like being the ruling party in different states.they could only rule few states and now they are limited to a couple of states.
This means communists in India don't own India's narrative and hence has no stake in it.if India falls it will hence be blamed on congress,BJP,the religious hindus.this is why here communists are for many anti national practices as they have to gain by India experiencing difficulty as the status quo of them being minority will change.
In China CCP owns China and it failures and successes and hence it cannot let it down as people and the world will blame CCP.this means that the CCP is inherently tied to he countries wellbeing in terms of prosperity and military power.this makes CCP defacto nationalist.it does not matter what they do outside,inside they destroy the enemies that might be pro America and tries to weaken China like democratic activists.
This means CCP will always reliably oppose forces like Muslim uighers and anti nationals.
Another example of nationalistic communists is Soviet union after stalin.
The communists in USA and the West you see are anti nationalist and we must oppose them.
The nationalist communists in China will make sure that Muslims will not grow in china.that Christians will not dominate china.even if they do have Christians they will not be able to do their usual shenanigans.
However I must say that India should not be communists if it means yechuries communism.it should become communist if it is ccps xenophobic technology driven quasi capitalist anti Muslim communism.