Book Review Thread

Are you a fan of Dawood Ibrahim ?


  • Total voters
    22

nrupatunga

Senior Member
Joined
Feb 10, 2013
Messages
2,310
Likes
960
Return of a King: The Battle for Afghanistan, 1839-42 - By William Dalrymple

The story of the First Anglo-Afghan War, with striking parallels with what's going on in the region today.

Prelude
The book actually begins in 1809 when british india 1st sends an embassy to Shah Shuja, ruler of Kabul who is currently in Peshawar(2nd capital) asking for alliance. Shah shuja is also the grandson of Ahmed shah abdali. The durrani empire built by ahmed shah was built on collapse of 3 other empires i.e. mughals to south-west, Uzbeks in north and safavids in west was by then well on its way to disintegration as well. This embassy from a previously hostile neighbour, who had ensured due its well-discilined/trained army had made impossible the raids into india which had beena one of the primary source of afghan income. However timely it may have been from shuja's pov, the real reason for the embassy was far far away in Europe. British wanted to pre-empt any napoleonic- russian advances over its crown jewel. Napolean in his prime had secretly concluded a deal with Russian tsar to take away british jewel with an joint army via Persia. British get to know this via spies within tsar's entourage and hence an urgency from british to conclude an alliance.

Though shuja himself is thrown out by his rivals within Afghanistan and had to be exiled to Ludhiana with british embassy still in Peshawar. The new ruler Dost mohammed khan from a rival pathan clan places himself in saddle of Kabul. British look after shuja in Ludhiana, shuja tries unsuccessfully thrice to take back his kingdom. Finally after nearly 3 decades in exile, things look better for shuja as unlike previous times when british had only provided money and diplomatic support this time was prepared to fight along with him or rather lead the charge in what is known as 1st Anglo-Afghan war in 1839. This was being done because of THE GREAT GAME being played by british-russia in central asia. Though dost was interested to get into an alliance with british, due to their own misunderstandings of ground realities and ego clashes between various officials within british india, they allow russia to get into an alliance with dost mohammed khan.

War begins
The plan being british and shuja take the path of sind and baloach lands and then to Kandahar before going to kabul, while Sikhs ( who had by then lost peshwar to afghans) and shuja's son attack Peshawar and then to Kabul. Without actually getting to know the landscape the british army struggles in arid path taken by them. They loose a lot of camp followers and also soldiers due to lack of water/food. Also they would be harassed by baloach tribes on course of their path. Finally when they do make into pathan lands of kanadahar, the entire army along with horses/camels would be exhausted to the core and unable to put any meaningful fight. Afghans without knowing this, hearing about the huge army out there surrender themselves in Kandahar. Once Kandahar is lost, one by one cities fall without any fight as lot of deserters join them them and let british know of various weak points in the forts making the job easier. Once ghazni falls within 3 days of siege due to deserters letting know of the weak point of the fort, dost mohammed khan opens for negotiations with british , but his offer is rejected. Then he tries to rally the Kabul elites, and makes an emotional speech. But since by then the news of defeats reaching Kabul, nobody supports him. Hence dost mohammed khan flees into exile to Bukhara. Thus the army reaches Kabul with very less fighting to do on their side.

Aftermath and Retreat
Once british establish themselves and shuja on throne, they do everything to undermine him. Things worsen over a period 2 years where over ride every suggestion shuja gives them and make themselves an enemy of various tribes. They cut down the subsidies (bribes as they see it) to various tribes and also objecting various practices of the afghan society and most importantly insult various tribal leaders who then swear revenge against british. Also british would have sent back lot of troops back to india. Once the revolt starts, british again neglects advice from shuja to act decisively against revolters in kabul instead does nothing. Once revolters scent blood, they go on offensive, meanwhile shuja locks himself in a heavily fortified fort in the city. The massacre of the british begin, again mainly due to their own inaction even then. By then dost mohammed khan arrives to rally the rebels, though he surrenders himself to british the rebels find a capable replacement Akbar khan (son of dost mahammed). Meanwhile dost mohammed is sent into exile to Ludhiana. But akbar khan continues to harass the british. Finally when british having lost many of their lot go for retreat back into plains of Indus to safety. But they are continually harassed and killed, massacred by afghans.
With no food, and it being winter of 1842 many of soldiers die of cold in the mountains. Finally when the news of this massacre reaches british india, they plan to send an army of retribution. As the honour and dignity of british is at stake here. On course of the way to Kabul, they see piles and piles of bodies massacred by afghans previously, which infuriate the army even more. So this time its reversal, british army awear revenge and raid/pillage/burn/kill everyone, every village on the way to Kabul. In between shuja is killed over a perceived insult by his godson by the king to his family. Shuja's sons imprisoned in Kabul by akbar khan, escape the prison and join british. Though this time the british have come only for revenge and not support/place anyone on throne. Akbar khan fails in stopping the better armed and better trained army, flees towards central asia again. Once british enter Kabul, they go on a rampage burning the entire city. They leave as soon as they come.
With british going back, akbar khan returns and deposes the shuja's sons. British realise that in the ensuing chaos maybe only dost mohammed khan can bring some order in Afghanistan and release him from captivity in Ludhiana. So over a period of 3 years and having achieved nothing in Afghanistan apart from spending around 15 million and loosing thousands of troops, they return back to india. This war was a costly one nearly emptying the coffers of india and also failed to achieve anything militarily or strategically. Dost mohammed returns and establishes himself.
 

nrupatunga

Senior Member
Joined
Feb 10, 2013
Messages
2,310
Likes
960
1)This book has been heavily researched. William access various diplomatic dispatches, letters of british, Russians of those period. Also from an afghan pov of events happening, he has gone through various Persian works of that period, including shuja's biography, akbarnama, jang-nama. Overall a highly researched book. A must read book.

2) Also as per the popular folklore, that entire british army retreating from Kabul were massacred along the mountain passes apart from one doctor who was spared so that he can pass the message to british india. But this is not the case. Many survived, actually few who had reached jalalabad, managed to hold on until the next british army reached them. Actually these people had even defeated akbar khan and made him to flee.

Also to remember here is this happened over a period of 3 years. The retreat happened around 2 years after shah shuja had been placed on throne and not just after british entered kabul.


3)The book also focuses on the great game played between british and Russians from 1809-1839 period. One thing for sure, Europeans were leagues ahead in the way they acted to protect their interests. They came to distant lands, built their empires, established a huge spy network, learnt every language the natives spoke, gamed every scenario. They used the divide and rule policy effectively to ensure their rule. THE GREAT GAME chapter is very detailed and engrossing as to how diplomacy was played by both Russia and british.

One incident in the book which recounts the british agent's account in herat when he sees a Russian agent there
He raised and bowed as i rode up to him, but said nothing. I addressed him French – the general language of europeans in east – but he shook his head. I then spoke in English, and he answered in Russian. When i tried Persian, he seemed not to understand. Then he tried in Turcoman or uzbek Turkish. I knew sufficient of this language to carry basic conversation, but not to be inquisitive. This was evidently what he wanted, he rattled on as rapidly as possible. All i could find was that he was carrying presents to Persian ruler.
4)Though the book is mainly on anglo-afghan war, there are mention of Sikhs as well. Especailly ranjit singh. It mentions ranjit singh had helped Zaman shah brother of shah shuja retrieving him cannons stuck in Jhelum sands. This proved beneficial to ranjit singh, who then was just 19 years old was given the charge of Punjab esp Lahore in 1799.

The next mention of Sikhs mainly comes during the recapture of Peshawar by dost mohammed khan in mid 1830's. Here the encounter of hari singh and akbar khan in battlefield is retold where akbar khan finally kills hari singh in battlefield which leads to Sikhs abandoning battlefield as per various afghan sources. Later Sikhs are mentioned during tripartite talks between Sikhs, british, shah shuja where they plan to attack Afghanistan. Overall Sikhs had very less role during anglo-afghan war and is mentioned here and there before the war starts.

5)The author in the end jumps to current period, and compares the current scenario with that of 1st anglo-afghan war. He says similar to then, west has put a popalzai pathan (karzai) on power and the main resistance to that is being given by a barakzai pathan (mullah omar). Compares these two with shah shuja and dost mohammed khan.The author says the situation then and now are not that different and west apart from spending lot of $$$ may achieve very less within and for afghanistan .
He finally concludes by recounting his meeting with some tribal elders.
Last month some American officers and asked "Why do you hate us ". Elder replied, "because you blow our house, pull our women, kick our children. We can accept this. We will fight back and we will break your teeth. Then you will leave, just as british left before you, just as Russians left. It is just a matter of time". "These are the last days of Americans" another elder said, "next will be china".(Hopefully :thumb::clap:)
@Singh @TrueSpirit @datguy79 @Yusuf @parijataka @Tolaha
 
Last edited by a moderator:

parijataka

Senior Member
Joined
Oct 15, 2011
Messages
4,916
Likes
3,751
Country flag
^^^
Have read and enjoyed some books by Dalrymple such as `Among the believers..` etc. Will try to get my hands on this one.
 

TrueSpirit

Senior Member
Joined
Jun 17, 2009
Messages
1,893
Likes
841
@nrupatunga: Thank you for sharing the detailed gist.

While the topic & context seems extremely engrossing, this Dalrymple guy is perhaps being funded by Brookings Institute these days, so I am led to believe that his writing might not be unbiased anymore, if at all.

Though, I have always found the output from contemporary British historians to be far more objective & well-researched than their American counterparts. But give me Niall Ferguson over Bill Dalrymple, any day.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

nrupatunga

Senior Member
Joined
Feb 10, 2013
Messages
2,310
Likes
960
@TrueSpirit One thing for sure, book may be biased in certain ways. But the GREAT GAME portions of the book is not be missed. he has researched a lot. He mentions various letters written by russians/british, diplomatic dispatches by them etc. How each thought about other's actions on ground, how they planned to negate that. Really nice.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

ashdoc

Senior Member
Joined
Jul 21, 2010
Messages
2,980
Likes
3,682
Country flag
Book : Muslims in Indian cities---trajectories of marginalization

I recently bought this book , but was overwhelmed by the exhaustive content of the book . So I have decided to read it only partially and slowly bit by bit over months .

However , there is no doubt that it is a formidably well researched book . It gives detailed accounts of how hindu muslim relations have evolved over a long time in several cities from North to South India , with each city having a detailed separate chapter .

Typical of todays writing , heavily influenced by the secular forces as it is , the book attempts to show how muslims have become more and more marginalized economically and have been forced to withdraw into their own ghettos in most of these cities .

Maybe one day you may get an '' Ashdoc's review '' of the book......or maybe not....
The problem is---the book discusses the story of muslims in each city almost like a PHD thesis and I start getting bored after a while and then move on to another city without completing the earlier city's story . And then the same thing happens---I move on from the second city to the third without completing because of boredom caused by excessively detailed descriptions of each city's muslims .

But if anybody has patience to read it , this book seems to be certainly worth a read . The authors have done a commendable job in tracing the history of muslims in Indian cities from the pre independence era to the post partition era to the post babri masjid era .

Of course , the usual suspects are there---the hindutva forces are painted as villains and descriptions of all riots paint muslims as victims of hindu aggression . This is typical of today's writing which is dominated by secular thinking . To promote this thinking , the authors have an ideal tool in hand---the educational and economic backwardness of muslims , which is used to prove that muslims have been deliberately marginalized by the majority community .

How much to believe these claims---that the reader should only decide for himself....
 

ashdoc

Senior Member
Joined
Jul 21, 2010
Messages
2,980
Likes
3,682
Country flag
Re: Book : Muslims in Indian cities---trajectories of marginalization

Review of the book by Frontline magazine/Hindu newspaper---

On city margins
 

Sakal Gharelu Ustad

Detests Jholawalas
Ambassador
Joined
Apr 28, 2012
Messages
7,114
Likes
7,762
Re: Book : Muslims in Indian cities---trajectories of marginalization

Given your interpretation, wouldn't the case study of just one city been enough to prove the claims!

The hindus go and force muslims to have 10 kids..No education ==> ghettoization
 

ashdoc

Senior Member
Joined
Jul 21, 2010
Messages
2,980
Likes
3,682
Country flag
Re: Book : Muslims in Indian cities---trajectories of marginalization

deleted...........
 

Bilal

Regular Member
Joined
Jan 5, 2013
Messages
266
Likes
32
Re: Book : Muslims in Indian cities---trajectories of marginalization

So basically ghettoisation,means gang culture,crime and also other associations with criminal activity it makes sense.
 

Decklander

Senior Member
Joined
Nov 19, 2012
Messages
2,654
Likes
4,111
Re: Book : Muslims in Indian cities---trajectories of marginalization

Pls do not use the word called ghettoisation. The very basics of society tells us that we tend to feel safe with people of our religion or thinking. Muslims in India staying together in their areas is nothing wrong. Hindus also did that when India was undivided in muslim majority provinces. This is the way we live in a society. Even in UK, we have areas where Indians, Pakistanies and bangladeshies are in majority and tend to stay or buy properties only in those areas. This is true of even America. We come together as one people in those foriegn lands but fail to connect within our own lands.
 

dhananjay1

Senior Member
Joined
Mar 10, 2013
Messages
3,291
Likes
5,544
Re: Book : Muslims in Indian cities---trajectories of marginalization

One has to understand that the point of view and the size of contents are two totally different things. There could be sizable books both for and against a particular ideology. The secularists have the whole system supporting their ideology, they can easily churn out books with "academic" credentials. The senior members of academia, politics, and media would all support their view. While the authors with opposite views would be demonized even at the initial stage. They won't get endorsement from either academia or the government.
 

kseeker

Retired
New Member
Joined
Jul 24, 2013
Messages
2,515
Likes
2,126
Salim Must Die – A Book Review

Well, I just read the book 'Salim Must Die' by Mukul Deva.



Published on 2009 by Harper Collins.

Here are my thoughts on this book.

Like his (Mukul Deva) first book 'Lashkar: Into the Heart of Terror', this book has a gripping story as well, a sequel of Lashkar.

If you like the thriller stories, you must read this book for sure.

The plot is pretty nice and covers most of the aspects of global terrorism, it's causes and sundries.

'Salim Must Die' is a story which concentrates on a Wicked ISI brigadier (Salim Murad) and his plot to spread fear in Kafirs across the globe through Paki state sponsored terrorism, at the same time, settling the erstwhile score with India. Salim gathers his henchmen from different parts of the world and engineers an almost perfect plan to hit the multiple targets across globe simultaneously with briefcase nukes, chem and bio weapons on a chosen day. The perfectly executed plan takes an uneven twist with the unforeseen death of the rogue scientist who was part of this master terror attacks. Then the force-22 (an elite force of Indian commandos) takes over the situation to counter these attacks and tries to foil the attack bids. While one unit of force-22 tracks the events, a second unit is sent deep into LAND OF $#!T to hunt down the the hunter infamous brigadier Salim...

Characters are well defined however, I didn't like the fact that, our impotent Prim(at)e Minister, Home(wreck) Minister and Def(ence) & dumb minister have been portrayed as kind of Super Politicians !

MD sure has a Nostradamus premonitions, this book was written in 2009 wherein he predicted the 'geronimo operation' !!! If at all, some one from CIA/FBI had read MDs books when they were published, they would have had to spend less $$$$s and time to hunt down the OBL (Geronimo) ;)

This book covers current geo-political stand on Terrorism, high level covert operations, espionage tactics, nukes, chem weapons, human emotions, what is ISI and why we (Indians) must not never ever trust Pakistan till eternity etc...

Pace of the story is bit inconsistent compared to Lashkar. It begins with slow pace, pick up rapid pace in the middle and ends with a slow pace.

Epilogue is boring or definitely incomplete in my perception.

Overall a good read, I would rate 3.5/5.

=======================================

@Ray Sir.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Ray

The Chairman
Professional
Joined
Apr 17, 2009
Messages
43,132
Likes
23,835
Re: Salim Must Die – A Book Review

@kseeker,

Thanks.

A very good review.

Will buy.

Though my per name is 'Salim'.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

kseeker

Retired
New Member
Joined
Jul 24, 2013
Messages
2,515
Likes
2,126
Book Reviews - Blowback & Tanzeem by Mukul Deva

Honorable mention: @Ray Sir,

============================================

I read 2 more books written by Mukul Deva viz: Blowback (Lashkar Part #3) and Tanzeem (Lashkar Part #4) which completes the Lashkar Series (Lashkar and Salim Must Die - Lashkar Part #2).

About Lashkar #1 and Lashkar #2, they have been already discussed in members section

http://defenceforumindia.com/forum/members-corner/54264-military-fiction.html

http://defenceforumindia.com/forum/members-corner/54873-salim-must-die-book-review.html

Both the books, Blowback (Lashkar Part #3) and Tanzeem (Lashkar Part #4) are excellent. Both have gripping story.

Blowback (Lashkar Part #3)



Blowback concentrates on IM (Indian Mujahideen), Iqbal ( Terrorist turned a Force 22 operative), Force 22, ISI, current politics etc...

MD has narrated story in such a way that, you would stick to the book till you complete it.

Story revolves around IM , it's inception, how it operated/s and their plot to spread havoc in India by blowing civilians. Iqbal, who had helped force 22 in killing wicked ISI brigadier (Lashkar Part#2), comes to the rescue. He infiltrates the IM and helps force 22 gain gain control and decimate IM in the end.

Pace of the story is excellent however, at certain point one might feel that, it was stretched a bit longer than needed. Story has bit of romance, love and lot of emotions.

It portrays the life of an undercover agent who has everything at stake !

One would sense the anxiety, fear and bravery of an undercover agent who is ready to sacrifice everything for a cause and to save his country (India) from the hungry hyenas !!!

Post reading the book, my respect towards agents who are working for RAW, NIA and other agencies like them have increased thousand folds.

Overall a very good reading.

Tanzeem (Lashkar Part #4, Finale)



Pretty awesome conclusion to the Lashkar Series !

Story talks about cold war,Global Jihad, it's inception, ISI, Force 22, Af-Pak issues and of course Iqbal (protagonist).

In this Finale, Iqbal who had lost his everything (Only love of his life) is devastated emotionally, stands for a cause i.e. to stop Global Jihad.

He travels great distances in to enemy territory with very little or no help of Force 22 and achieves unexpected and exemplary results without caring for rewards or the glory !!!

This book has more military action than previous ones in the Lashkar series.

One would feel that, battle ground is in front of them and they are the mute witnesses. Simply, excellent.

A must read for sure.

=============================================

If you are a defence enthusiast, you must read MDs books.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Ray

The Chairman
Professional
Joined
Apr 17, 2009
Messages
43,132
Likes
23,835
Re: Book Reviews - Blowback & Tanzeem by Mukul Deva

@kseeker

Thanks.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

nrupatunga

Senior Member
Joined
Feb 10, 2013
Messages
2,310
Likes
960
Read recently White Mughals : Love and Betrayal in Eighteenth-Century India - By William Dalrymple



The books tells mainly the story of James Krikpatrick, the british resident in hyderabad's Nizam court and Khair-un-Nissa, a muslim woman from elite/royal background. But more than the main story, what is interesting is the details how the europeans and british specifically functioned at a social level during their early colonising days. How they had taken upon various indian customs in their daily life either becoming hindus or muslims.

The initial chapters are how british adapted to indian customs, marrying indian women, having children etc. The author quotes numerous examples of this. Only after wellesley became the governor-general did the british practice of staying away from indians take place. That too only when during early 19th century when european women began coming to india in large numbers, did this segregation take place. Early on in the book somewhere its mentioned that when europeans started coming and settling here there were around 1 eurpoean woman for every 6-7 european men and since most of these men would be deputed to india by EIC in their mid teens (around 15 years of age) these men/boys would have spent more time in indian than their native england by the time they reach around 30 years. Even islam had been highly indiansed then, various festivals of muslims had shias, sunnis, hindus taking part in it. Also book mentions that muslims had taken on something like a pind dhan or offerings to deceased like the hindus do. A far cry form what is happening today, where islam is geting wahabbised in india. There are lot of information such as these on the social life of britishers during their early colonising days.

A must read is what i say. Though at times the story is very specific like how james had to struggle to find variety of trees for his garden etc etc. But this book has a lot on british lifestyle in general and the way they led their social lives in india. Tells a lot about the people who colonised india

The book ends with this paragragh

As the story of James Achilles Kirkpatrick and Khair-un-nissa shows, east and west are not irreconcilable, and never have been. Only bigotry, prejudics, racism and fear drive them apart. But they have met and mingled in the past; and they will do so again.
 

Global Defence

New threads

Articles

Top