Blacklist ISI as a terrorist entity, demands Kabul

Sam2012

Tihar Jail
Banned
Joined
Dec 10, 2012
Messages
743
Likes
205
NEW DELHI: Should Pakistan's ISI, the country's powerful intelligence agency, be blacklisted? The Afghan national Security Council has strongly recommended that the ISI should be declared a terrorist entity. The strongly-worded official Afghan reaction will affect outside efforts to stitch an agreement between Afghanistan and Pakistan on bringing the Taliban into government.

On Sunday, Rahmatullah Nabil, Afghanistan's deputy national security adviser, was quoted as saying in an interview, "The interesting question is why is a terrorist blacklisted but the person who issues the Fatwa for them [to act] or who provides havens to them not blacklisted?"

He added, "Against these people, organizations at a global scale should unite. People of Afghanistan and the government of Afghanistan will continue their voice of peace, but unfortunately there is not much hope from Pakistan's side and therefore we should be more united, more mobilized, and not be deceived by them." This was the most public outburst from the Afghan government after the chief of the Pakistan Ulema Council Tahir Mehmood Ashrafi declared that the Taliban insurgency in Afghanistan was "legitimate".

Nabil was echoed by Afghan President Hamid Karzai, who, on Monday stated that Islamabad had not taken any "practical steps" towards tackling terrorism in Afghanistan coming from Pakistan.

For those following the minutiae of the reconciliation process, the Afghanistan-Pakistan relationship is not doing as well as it should. It was only a few months ago that the chairman of the High Peace Council, Salahuddin Rabbani took a "peace process roadmap" to Islamabad for support on a reconciliation programme with the Taliban. Western governments have been on an overdrive to get Afghans toe the Pakistani line on a peace process that seeks to accommodate Pakistan's "Taliban" concerns.

Blacklist ISI as a terrorist entity, demands Kabul - The Times of India
 

Vishwarupa

Senior Member
Joined
Sep 15, 2009
Messages
2,438
Likes
3,600
Country flag
Blacklist ISI as a terrorist entity, demands Kabul

Bravo Afganistan!! You are daring indeed.

What is Delhi saying about ISI other than sharing Brochure appreciating their work done against India.

Apart from the arresting few spies GOI has hardly done anything against ISI. I sometimes feel that ISI has deep roots in GOI.

This Aman ki asha is ISI brain child.
 

Coalmine

Senior Member
Joined
Jan 14, 2013
Messages
4,221
Likes
14,953
Country flag
It's a cowardly failed terrorist bastard organisation
 

The Fox

Regular Member
Joined
Aug 22, 2012
Messages
457
Likes
270
NEW DELHI: Should Pakistan's ISI, the country's powerful intelligence agency, be blacklisted? The Afghan national Security Council has strongly recommended that the ISI should be declared a terrorist entity. The strongly-worded official Afghan reaction will affect outside efforts to stitch an agreement between Afghanistan and Pakistan on bringing the Taliban into government.

On Sunday, Rahmatullah Nabil, Afghanistan's deputy national security adviser, was quoted as saying in an interview, "The interesting question is why is a terrorist blacklisted but the person who issues the Fatwa for them [to act] or who provides havens to them not blacklisted?"

He added, "Against these people, organizations at a global scale should unite. People of Afghanistan and the government of Afghanistan will continue their voice of peace, but unfortunately there is not much hope from Pakistan's side and therefore we should be more united, more mobilized, and not be deceived by them." This was the most public outburst from the Afghan government after the chief of the Pakistan Ulema Council Tahir Mehmood Ashrafi declared that the Taliban insurgency in Afghanistan was "legitimate".

Nabil was echoed by Afghan President Hamid Karzai, who, on Monday stated that Islamabad had not taken any "practical steps" towards tackling terrorism in Afghanistan coming from Pakistan.

For those following the minutiae of the reconciliation process, the Afghanistan-Pakistan relationship is not doing as well as it should. It was only a few months ago that the chairman of the High Peace Council, Salahuddin Rabbani took a "peace process roadmap" to Islamabad for support on a reconciliation programme with the Taliban. Western governments have been on an overdrive to get Afghans toe the Pakistani line on a peace process that seeks to accommodate Pakistan's "Taliban" concerns.

Blacklist ISI as a terrorist entity, demands Kabul - The Times of India
Afghans are talking their heart and mind and India do not have the balls to do this we should be ashamed of this and we should have done this first during the 1990 when Kashmir Insurgence started............. Well done Afghans you live up to ur name
 

Daredevil

On Vacation!
Super Mod
Joined
Apr 5, 2009
Messages
11,615
Likes
5,772
Just FYI:

Pakistan

State Sponsors of Terrorism

Former does not appear in latter link.
US was on the verge of declaring it as a state sponsorer of terrorism but held back for some unknown reasons (perhaps due to its help in Afghan Jihad against Russia).

This excerpt from Hussai Haqqani (recent Pakistan Ambassador to US) book "Pakistan: Between Mosque and Military"

A story from Haqqani's book nicely epitomizes the pattern. In the early 1990s, the U.S. became increasingly concerned about Pakistan's support for Islamist terrorism in Kashmir. Haqqani:

During meetings with [the U.S. ambassador Nicholas] Platt and the State Department's coordinator of the office of counterterrorism, Peter Burleigh, Pakistani officials flatly denied any official Pakistani involvement in support of terrorist activities. The [Pakistani intelligence agency] ISI advised civilian officials dealing official Americans to ask for evidence from the Americans of Pakistani activities supporting terrorism. The answers would give the ISI an idea of the means the United States was using for intelligence gathering in Pakistan and would enable it to restructure its effort to evade U.S. detection.

When an exasperated U.S. government threatened to designate Pakistan a state sponsor of terrorism:

Prime Minister Sharif presided over a meeting of senior officials .... The army chief, General Asif Nawaz, and the ISI director general, Lieutenant General Javed Nasir, participated. Nasir began by blaming the 'Indo-Zionist lobby' in Washington for the changed U.S. attitude toward Pakistan and insisted that Pakistan demand evidence from the United States confirming its allegations. He argued that the jihad in Kashmir was at a critical stage and could not be disrupted. 'We have been covering our tracks so far and will cover them even better in future ...."
http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2012/04/23/between-mosque-and-military.html
 

Decklander

Senior Member
Joined
Nov 19, 2012
Messages
2,654
Likes
4,111
What we need to do is to increase the cost to Pakistan for interfering in the affairs of Afganistan by taking war to Pak heartland of Punjab. Once we increase the stakes, PA will have to think thrice before trying what they did after withdrawal of Soviets from Afgan. Also a good thing is that US will maintain a force within Afgan to prevent takeover by Taliban. We must also at the same time start international campaign to dissolve the Durandline as a border between Pakistan and Afganistan.
 

Sam2012

Tihar Jail
Banned
Joined
Dec 10, 2012
Messages
743
Likes
205
Just FYI:

Pakistan

State Sponsors of Terrorism

Former does not appear in latter link.
OK Cuba because it was in soviet camp & it provided vital support during Cuban missile crisis

Iran because it threw puppet ruler & started to make WMD which US does not like

Sudan & Syria due to internal insurgency & possibility of developing WMD again against US policy

But one country called Pakistan took money from US as soft loan in 80's during soviet war in afghan & diverted it to its Atomic program & harbours terrorist who are responsible for 9/11 & 26/11 attack but they are not in list wowwwwwwwwwwww :thumb: what a rule keep ur double stantard up:hail:
 

W.G.Ewald

Defence Professionals/ DFI member of 2
Professional
Joined
Sep 28, 2011
Messages
14,139
Likes
8,594
Afghanistan wants ISI to be declared a terror outfit, renews demand for its ban : Asia, News - India Today

The Afghan National Security Council (NSC) has reportedly demanded that Pakistani spy agency Inter-Services Intelligence (ISI) be declared a terror outfit.

In a recent interview, Afghanistan's Deputy National Security Adviser (DNSA) Rahmatullah Nabil accused the ISI of plotting terror attacks to destabilise the country. He reportedly said that Afghanistan would push the United States to put the ISI on its terror ban list and demand sanctions on it.

The strongly-worded official Afghan reaction would certainly affect outside efforts to stitch an agreement between Afghanistan and Pakistan on bringing the Taliban into government.

However, India refused to back Nabil's latest call for a ban on the ISI.

Ministry of External Affairs (MEA) spokesperson Syed Akbaruddin said on Thursday that the department had issued a statement in December 2012 in this connection. Reacting to the grant of US immunity to the ISI, the MEA had then said it was "disappointing for India".

The Pak intelligence agency has often been blamed by Afghanistan and India for working more like a terror organisation. The Afghan government has now been raising pressure on the international community to hold Pakistan to account and ban the notorious ISI.
 

Latest Replies

Global Defence

New threads

Articles

Top