http://www.nytimes.com/2014/01/26/world/asia/beijings-air-would-be-step-up-for-smoggy-delhi.html By GARDINER HARRISJAN. 25, 2014 NEW DELHI â€” In mid-January, air pollution in Beijing was so bad that the government issued urgent health warnings and closed four major highways, prompting the panicked buying of air filters and donning of face masks. But in New Delhi, where pea-soup smog created what was by some measurements even more dangerous air, there were few signs of alarm in the countryâ€™s boisterous news media, or on its effervescent Twittersphere. Despite Beijingâ€™s widespread reputation of having some of the most polluted air of any major city in the world, an examination of daily pollution figures collected from both cities suggests that New Delhiâ€™s air is more laden with dangerous small particles of pollution, more often, than Beijingâ€™s. Lately, a very bad air day in Beijing is about an average one in New Delhi. The United States Embassy in Beijing sent out warnings in mid-January, when a measure of harmful fine particulate matter known as PM2.5 went above 500, in the upper reaches of the measurement scale, for the first time this year. This refers to particulate matter less than 2.5 micrometers in diameter, which is believed to pose the greatest health risk because it penetrates deeply into lungs. But for the first three weeks of this year, New Delhiâ€™s average daily peak reading of fine particulate matter from Punjabi Bagh, a monitor whose readings are often below those of other city and independent monitors, was 473, more than twice as high as the average of 227 in Beijing. By the time pollution breached 500 in Beijing for the first time on the night of Jan. 15, Delhi had already had eight such days. Indeed, only once in three weeks did New Delhiâ€™s daily peak value of fine particles fall below 300, a level more than 12 times the exposure limit recommended by the World Health Organization. â€œItâ€™s always puzzled me that the focus is always on China and not India,â€ said Dr. Angel Hsu, director of the environmental performance measurement program at the Yale Center for Environmental Law and Policy. â€œChina has realized that it canâ€™t hide behind its usual opacity, whereas India gets no pressure to release better data. So there simply isnâ€™t good public data on India like there is for China.â€ Experts have long known that Indiaâ€™s air is among the worst in the world. A recent analysis by Yale researchers found that seven of the 10 countries with the worst air pollution exposures are in South Asia. And evidence is mounting that Indians pay a higher price for air pollution than almost anyone. A recent study showed that Indians have the worldâ€™s weakest lungs, with far less capacity than Chinese lungs. Researchers are beginning to suspect that Indiaâ€™s unusual mix of polluted air, poor sanitation and contaminated water may make the country among the most dangerous in the world for lungs. India has the worldâ€™s highest death rate because of chronic respiratory diseases, and it has more deaths from asthma than any other nation, according to the World Health Organization. A recent study found that half of all visits to doctors in India are for respiratory problems, according to Sundeep Salvi, director of the Chest Research Foundation in Pune. Clean Air Asia, an advocacy group, found that another common measure of pollution known as PM10, for particulate matter less than 10 micrometers in diameter, averaged 117 in Beijing in a six-month period in 2011. In New Delhi, the Center for Science and Environment used government data and found that an average measure of PM10 in 2011 was 281, nearly two-and-a-half times higher. Perhaps most worrisome, Delhiâ€™s peak daily fine particle pollution levels are 44 percent higher this year than they were last year, when they averaged 328 over the first three weeks of the year. Fine particle pollution has been strongly linked with premature death, heart attacks, strokes and heart failure. In October, the World Health Organization declared that it caused lung cancer. The United States Embassy in Beijing posts on Twitter the readings of its air monitor, helping to spur awareness of the problem. The readings have more than 35,000 followers. The United States does not release similar readings from its New Delhi Embassy, saying the Indian government releases its own figures. In China, concerns about air quality have transfixed many urban residents, and some government officials say curbing the pollution is a priority. But in India, Delhiâ€™s newly elected regional government did not mention air pollution among its 18 priorities, and Indiaâ€™s environment minister quit in December amid widespread criticism that she was delaying crucial industrial projects. Her replacement, the governmentâ€™s petroleum minister, almost immediately approved several projects that could add considerably to pollution. India and China strenuously resisted pollution limits in global climate talks in Warsaw in November. Frank Hammes, chief executive of IQAir, a Swiss-based maker of air filters, said his companyâ€™s sales were hundreds of times higher in China than in India. â€œIn China, people are extremely concerned about the air, especially around small children,â€ Mr. Hammes said. â€œWhy thereâ€™s not the same concern in India is puzzling.â€ In multiple interviews, Delhiites expressed a mixture of unawareness and despair about the cityâ€™s pollution levels. â€œI donâ€™t think pollution is a major concern for Delhi,â€ said Akanksha Singh, a 20-year-old engineering student who lives on Delhiâ€™s outskirts in Ghaziabad, adding that he felt that Delhiâ€™s pollution problems were not nearly as bad as those of surrounding towns. In 1998, Indiaâ€™s Supreme Court ordered that Delhiâ€™s taxis, three-wheelers and buses be converted to compressed natural gas, but the resulting improvements in air quality were short-lived as cars flooded the roads. In the 1970s, Delhi had about 800,000 vehicles; now it has 7.5 million, with 1,400 more added daily. â€œNow the air is far worse than it ever was,â€ said Anumita Roy Chowdhury, executive director of the Center for Science and Environment. Indiansâ€™ relatively poor lung function has long been recognized, but researchers assumed for years that the difference was genetic. Then a 2010 study found that the children of Indian immigrants who were born and raised in the United States had far better lung function than those born and raised in India. â€œItâ€™s not genetics; itâ€™s mostly the environment,â€ said Dr. MyLinh Duong, an assistant professor of respirology at McMaster University in Hamilton, Ontario. In a study published in October, Dr. Duong compared lung tests taken in 38,517 healthy nonsmokers from 17 countries who were matched by height, age and sex. Indiansâ€™ lung function was by far the lowest among those tested. All of this has led some wealthy Indians to consider leaving. Annat Jain, a private equity investor who returned to India in 2001 after spending 12 years in the United States, said his father died last year of heart failure worsened by breathing problems. Now his 4-year-old daughter must be given twice-daily breathing treatments. â€œBut whenever we leave the country, everyone goes back to breathing normally,â€ he said. â€œItâ€™s something my wife and I talk about constantly.â€ Malavika Vyawahare contributed reporting from New Delhi, and Edward Wong from Beijing. A version of this article appears in print on January 26, 2014, on page A6 of the New York edition with the headline: Beijingâ€™s Bad Air Would Be Step Up for Smoggy Delhi.