Battle of Bahraich in 11th century India

Discussion in 'Military History' started by Bhoja, Apr 16, 2012.

  1. Bhoja

    Bhoja Regular Member

    Joined:
    Oct 8, 2011
    Messages:
    129
    Likes Received:
    158
    The battle of Bahraich was fought between the Turkic invader Salar Masud Ghazni and a confederation of several Indian kings led by Raja Sukhdev in the 11th century.


    The nephew of Mahmood Ghazni, known as Salar Masud Ghazni, invaded India with an army of more than 100,000 men in may 1031 AD. This time, the army was not a raiding party like that of Mahmud Ghazni who came with intention of raiding, looting and retreating with the loot to Afghanistan . They were backed by the imperial army and came here with the intention of permanent conquest in India.
    King Anandpal Shahi tried to check this Gazni advance towards heartland of India . He was helped by King of Sialkot , Rai Arjun. But, this alliance was overwhelmed by superiority of numbers of Turkic army. After defeating Anandpal Shahi and Rai Arjun, Masud advanced towards Malwa and Gujarat . King Mahipal Tomara tried to check their advance here but was defeated too.
    After victories across North Indian plains, Masud Ghazni settled at Bahraich near Lucknow . He stayed here up to mid 1033. Meanwhile, 17 Kings of North India forged an alliance. This is the biggest confederation that have ever existed in India . They were Rai Raib, Rai Saib, Rai Arjun, Rai Bheekhan, Rai Kanak, Rai Kalyan, Rai Makaru, Rai Savaru, Rai Aran, Rai Birbal, Rai Jaypal, Rai Shreepal, Rai Harpal, Rai Hakru, Rai Prabhu, Rai Deo Narayan and Rai Narsinha. Raja Bhoj of Malwa also played an important role in this battle. The head of this confederation was Raja Sukhdev. It would be interesting to know how the alliance was forged and how was the game of chess played before the final showdown on 14th June.
    In June 1033, as per Hindu traditions, Masud Ghazni was intimated by Rajput confederation that the land belonged to Rajputs and Hindus and Masud should evacuate these lands. Masud replied that all land belongs to Khuda and hence he would not retreat.
    On 13th June, Morning, Rajput army of about 120,000 descended on Ghazni camp of Bahraich. Masud's army was completely besieged and encircled. The battle continued for hours. In the end, each and every man in Masood's camp was killed. No POW's were taken, no mercy was shown on the Turkic army. The location of this battle to be precise was near Chittaura Jheel, a lake about 8 KM away from modern Bahraich on Bahraich-Gond Road . The battle ended on 14th June with Victory of Raja Sukhdev and his Rajput alliance.On the evening of 14 June 1033 AD,Sunday Salar Masud was beheaded by Raja Sukhdev. The battle ended with Victory of Raja Sukhdev and his Rajput alliance.
    The invasion was completely crushed and such resounding was this victory that none of the king from Northwest dared to invade India for 160 years..
     
    Last edited: Apr 16, 2012
  2.  
  3. KS

    KS Bye bye DFI Veteran Member

    Joined:
    Aug 3, 2010
    Messages:
    8,008
    Likes Received:
    5,718
    Location:
    irrelevant
    That is how it should have been. No quarters given, no prisoners taken..:thumb:

    But these battles when native Indians crushed the invaders , which should have been the pride of Indians, are hardly mentioned in our history books..:tsk:

    I admire the Chinese in this regard. They study their high points much more than the high points of their oppressors and hence a natural pride in their civilization is instilled. In Indian history books its the exact opposite - the supposed high points of the invaders are given wide coverage while the actual high of our own are not even mentioned in some cases like this or suppressed...falsification of history.all for the sake of some 'mythical' harmony.:tsk:
     
    parijataka, prateikf and LalTopi like this.
  4. Kunal Biswas

    Kunal Biswas Member of the Year 2011 Moderator

    Joined:
    May 26, 2010
    Messages:
    27,610
    Likes Received:
    28,427
    Location:
    BHARAT, INDIA, HINDUSTHAN
    Thanks for sharing..

    I wish we have pics..
     
  5. LalTopi

    LalTopi Regular Member

    Joined:
    Mar 28, 2012
    Messages:
    582
    Likes Received:
    299
    Also shows how much we achieve when we are truly united against a common enemy.
    We must never again breakup and get conquered.
     
  6. Kunal Biswas

    Kunal Biswas Member of the Year 2011 Moderator

    Joined:
    May 26, 2010
    Messages:
    27,610
    Likes Received:
    28,427
    Location:
    BHARAT, INDIA, HINDUSTHAN
    Remind me 300 movie..
     
  7. devgupt

    devgupt Regular Member

    Joined:
    Feb 25, 2009
    Messages:
    576
    Likes Received:
    261
    Location:
    Salt Lake City, Utah, US
    Sindh fell in 712 AD. Delhi - 1196 AD. It took various categories of invaders from west half a millennium to consolidate the area from Sindh to North India- which shows the level of resistance put up.
    There is a reason why Hinduism survives today.
     
    parijataka, pankaj nema and KS like this.
  8. Patriot

    Patriot Senior Member Senior Member

    Joined:
    Apr 11, 2010
    Messages:
    1,760
    Likes Received:
    538
    Location:
    Ahmedabad, Gujarat, India
    If you read history books of RSS sponsored schools, the history of ancient India is given in full glory & wars we have faced. Even the details which Indian has defeated the Alexander the great and wounded him & defeat of Salyukas & feat of Samudragupt , Skandgupt & Vikramaditya etc..

    Our government is not putting our history facts in right perspective and instilling the pride & patriotism in the students.
     
  9. pankaj nema

    pankaj nema Senior Member Senior Member

    Joined:
    Oct 1, 2009
    Messages:
    3,454
    Likes Received:
    1,410
    Mate you brought tears to my eyes ; Really .

    I only wish we could have been more united during the periods when there was peace
    such as ; here it is told that this Battle happened in 1033 AD

    SO this 160 year period between 1033 till 1199 AD should have been for consolidation
    and forging national unity .Anyway :sad:
     

Share This Page