BS. No slaves in a civilized country? You got to be freaking kidding me. There are millions of slaves today. Even in your own country.
The number of slaves today remains as high as 12 million to 27 million,
the highest number in human history.
Contemporary slavery - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Your ignorance disgusts me. Especially when it takes like 3 sec to google.
I meant legal slaves
My words were explained with a clear reference to a dictionary. Not my problem you consider a dictionary as imaginative.
Everyone knows the definition of a slave. When I asked a close ended question, if there are slaves in China, a simple Yes or No answer would've done it. But no, you rant back with the same definitions.
I asked as many times - "are you saying there are slaves in China?" You never answered the question. Not my problem.
Do they not teach you the difference between connotation and denotation in your school?
They do very well. What you don't know is, slave and servant aren't synonyms, that your arguments of context could be supported and you could use them interchangeably.
When you mean an extremely hard working, slogging servant - you still say 'Servant' and not 'Slave'.
I can , but I prefer the term "slave" to emphasize their situation, problem with that?
See above
You have to apply for a visa to come here. Duh
Exactly. Then how are they slaves?
One might say they "slog", they "work overtime", they "work in less then ideal pay". Work as slaves is not the right way to convey the meaning.
You do know it is a difference between written laws and how it is praticed, right? According to statistics from the Directorate of Immigration (UDI) in 2006 had a total of 1243 au pairs in Norway. Almost half of these, 587 were from the Philippines. - Everyone I interviewed broke one or more of the laws and regulations governing the scheme, but it should distinguish between serious and less serious offenses, says Marte Bertelsen.Furthermore Bertelsen says that half of the au pairs interviewed was home with the kids all day.
Understood (couldn't you have said it the first time
).
Coming back to my question - does this make them slaves? If yes, you're hinting either at law being broken at large scale in China and that there are human rights violation (illegal slavery in this context).
If no, then we're back at square one - they're not slaves.
- I believe are serious violations of the rule that an au pair to work more than five hours per day. In these cases, not the au pair scheme intention fulfilled, says Bertelsen.
From a research paper. Not your imaginary world.
forskning.no > Lov og rett for au pairer
That explains the notion better. There is way to say this rather then writing 'working as slaves' .... "made to work overtime
Do they have any will free will and do they move around? Or are they always in captivitiy?
Show me where I said that?
I posted those questions to ascertain whether the au pairs fit into slavery or are mere servants.
Where did I say that you said so? Those were my questions
But that is how a slave would be and you're the one to use the term. Aren't you?
Then stop behaving like one and throw around your tantrums.
I'm not throwing tantrums, who started it by taking a personal jibe?
I have explained a half dozen times my statements with references to dictionary and statistics and research papers. How many times do I have to repeat myself?
I know of those definitions already and statistcs were not in the picture when this exchange started.
I have asked my questions as many number of times while you kept repeating the same definitions instead of addressing them.
So there is illegal slavery going on in China. You could've said it the first time. Like I said before, everyone knows the definition of a slave.
By the way, don't give me English lessons when you keep missing pronouns and articles on every second line.
Many Chinesse posters here have an even worse record, but they don't rant back when their own houses are made of glass (metaphorically that is).
I'm done debating but if you want, this can be taken up via PM. No more OT posts on this thread.
Regards,
Virendra