America poses serious competition to Russia in Indian arms market

Discussion in 'Defence & Strategic Issues' started by AVERAGE INDIAN, Nov 9, 2013.

  1. AVERAGE INDIAN

    AVERAGE INDIAN EXORCIST Senior Member

    Joined:
    Sep 22, 2012
    Messages:
    2,762
    Likes Received:
    2,718
    Location:
    Detroit MI
    [​IMG]


    Russia occupies a special place in the Indian arms market. As the main producer of arms for New Delhi, Moscow plays an important role not only in supplying military technology, but also in the corresponding transfer of technology. In recent years, India’s economic and political might in the world has increased and the US has started to see India as a serious counterweight to the ever-increasing influence of China.

    US-Indian relations have also developed rapidly in the defence sector. India has begun to replace Russian arms with American weaponry and in recent years, Russia has conceded a lot of ground to the United States.

    Here are some examples of American expansion in the Indian market at the cost of Russia:


    Apache combat helicopter over Mi-28

    India was looking to replace its ageing fleet of Russian Mi-24 with 22 new combat helicopters. Making a selection from a range of models, India chose to not buy the Mi-28 and Ka-52 offered by Russia but instead ordered the Apache, manufactured in the United States. The total value of the deal is estimated at $1.5 billion.

    Chinook over the Mi-26

    The Indian leadership decided to purchase new heavy transport helicopters to replace the Mi-26. This is the world’s largest helicopter and it could be said that in terms of both flight performance and price it trumps theAmerican Chinook. It was a Mi-26 that once delivered several Chinook helicopters that had sustained damage in the Afghan mountains to a repair base. Nevertheless as surprising as it is, the Indian Government placed an order to purchase 15 Chinook helicopters at a cost of almost $1 billion

    P-8 replaced the Tu-142 anti-submarine warfare aircraft

    For a long time the Indian Navy operated the Tu-142 anti-submarine warfare aircraft (a special modification of the Tu-95). Despite this however India ordered 12 anti-submarine warfare R-8s from their American manufacturers. In doing so India became the first country to operate these aircrafts outside the United States. The contract is worth at least $3 billion. It is possible that India may order another 12 of these aircraft in the future.

    C-130 transport aircraft over An-124

    The Indian fleet of medium range heavy transport aircraft consisted mainly of the An-124, however India decided to seek a replacement. Russia was hoping that India would purchase upgraded models of these transport aircraft, however New Delhi preferred the more expensive American option and ordered 12 C-130 J aircraft known as the SuperHercules at a cost of over $2.1 billion



    C-17 military transport aircraft prevailed over the Il-76

    It could be said that for the past few decades the Russian Il-76 has been the ‘star’ of Russian military-transport aviation. India ordered several of these aircraft for her own fleet. Nevertheless despite all the advantages of the Il-76 and its recent modification, the Il-476, India, in securing a contract with the US to purchase 10 C-17 Globemaster military-transport aircraft for $4.1 billion showed that she was intent on purchasing military hardware produced by American manufacturers wherever possible.

    Stinger versus the ‘Igla’

    In spite of the fact that India once purchased an enormous number of ‘Igla-1’ Russian portable air defence missile systems (PZRK – Perenosnoy Zenitniy Raketniy Kompleks) known by the NATO codename SA-16 Gimlet, she has now refused to buy more of these. In place of these systems New Delhi has decided to purchase 245 Stinger portable air defence missile systems along with a number of the corresponding projectiles. India has therefore abstained from equipping her Army with the new and cheaper Russian ‘Igla’ (SA-18 Grouse) and ‘Igla-S’ (SA-24 Grinch) missile systems.

    Russia has conceded an enormous economic advantage as a result of American activity on the Indian arms market. The overall value of all the military contracts between the Americans and the Indians is believed to be around $12 billion.


    Can Russia stop Indian drift?

    In five years, India will replace its fleet of 140 MiG-21 and 100 MiG-27 aircraft, with the Rafale and the ‘Tejas’. Ageing MiG-29s will also be scrapped some ten years from now. Russian defence companies will be actively promoting their own products to replace these 260 aircraft. Although 140 Su-30 and more than a hundred Su-50 aircraft are more than likely to be purchased, Russia’s ability to maintain her monopoly on the Indian arms market will encounter some serious obstacles. Earlier this year Russia failed to sell the ‘Buk’-M1-2 air defence system (known in NATO as the SA-17 Grizzly), because of a preference for the Israeli Spider system. A programme to supply India with a large number of T-90 tanks was also stopped because the Indians had started to manufacture their own model the ‘Arjun’.

    Despite all these setbacks Russian arms manufacturers are still able to fight off competition from French, Israeli, and British companies in the Indian arms market although competing with the United States is going to be far from easy. Naturally Russia will still retain a significant share in the Indian arms market for at least the next decade. A blow of $12 billion however, which Russia incurred due to American competition, should force many to rethink the situation.

    America poses serious competition to Russia in Indian arms market | Russia & India Report
     
    W.G.Ewald likes this.
  2.  
  3. p2prada

    p2prada Stars and Ambassadors Stars and Ambassadors

    Joined:
    May 25, 2009
    Messages:
    10,233
    Likes Received:
    3,896
    Location:
    Holy Hell
    The only real victory. Apache beat the Mi-28 in technical parameters and took it out of contention.

    Mi-26 may have been too big for tactical capability. So this depended on what IAF considered 'heavy-lift.'

    Tu-142 wasn't a competitor.

    P-8I never prevailed over anything since it was a FMS contract.

    Author is an idiot. An-124 is not part of the IAF. He needs to google IL-214.

    C-130 never prevailed over anything since it was a FMS contract.

    IL-76 no longer exists in the form of a new aircraft and C-17 never prevailed over anything since it was a FMS contract.

    The Russians have only recently tested the IL-476.

    What a joke. Stingers were offered as part of the Apache weapons package. Obviously Igla has no place here.

    The offer was for the IAF and not IA.

    Only if they are not able to compete.

    Lol. Author needs to google the Maitri SAM.

    Is that why there is a new contract being drawn up for T-90MS? :rolleyes:

    Typical BS reporting. As bad as the recent article by Bharat Karnad on IAF.
     
    ladder, AVERAGE INDIAN and t_co like this.
  4. Yusuf

    Yusuf GUARDIAN Administrator

    Joined:
    Mar 24, 2009
    Messages:
    24,274
    Likes Received:
    11,283
    Location:
    BANGalore
    Headline correct, "facts" in the article incorrect.
     

Share This Page