With all due respect Ray sir, I myself have been guilty of trolling on Pakistanis for a long time . After 26/11 even I took to the net for Paki bashing, because back then the only voices you heard on youtube and other sites was of people like Zaid Hamid and PTV. But things have changed since, most Pakistani videos on YT today are pro India, and parsing India's achievements in every field, so I don't think it is necessary to rub it in their face, after they have come to the realization that they were wrong. Its okay to have a little fun once in a while, and yes we do have dedicated threads on this forum like "the Pakistani musings thread" , but seriously do we need to be so blinded by hate that we turn even their achievements into a negative fiasco ? I mean both our nations have a long way to go, and thankfully India at least is on the right track, but seriously do you want to see Pakistan fail, cause that will be more detrimental to India then any other nation. Go ahead and insult them if they do something wrong!, but if they are doing something right praise them. Asoka the great, is our national symbol/ emblem, and was praised not because he ended up becoming good, but because of the sheer distance he traveled from being evil and ruthless to being kind and humane. Pakistan and Pakistanis are doing just the same , and we must encourage them rather then make them feel sorry for giving way. I for one feel good that a rifle from the Indian subcontinent is being exported to a country that has a monopoly on arms !
With all due respect, this is my reply.
Well, there are many trolls on this forum and they transcend national borders. The Moderators have a huge problem in discerning if one is trolling or one is merely afflicted with ignorance. Hence, what looks trolling sometime is ascribed by us as abject ignorance or mental and knowledge incapacity causing virulent outpourings,
That apart, I am sure there are those in Pakistan who are disillusioned with the way Pakistan has floundered, tripped and finally turned ungovernable. And many of them are from India and they are called '
Mohajirs'. These people apparently are disillusioned that they quit their Motherland for the home of the Pure which has turned impure (in a manner of speaking) in all ways. Possibly, they yearn for their the 'good old days' and regret their decision to hotfoot to the so called Pureland.. They, naturally, are in the forefront of what one would think is being 'pro Indian'.
I wonder if there is any 'blind' hate towards Pakistan. But yes, if a country that celebrates terrorism and exports it to India, then one could hardly say that India shall embrace them as true peaceniks espousing international brotherhood. I am sure you will recall that the then PM, Zardari had openly admitted that Pakistan was sponsoring terrorism to India and their Adviser to the Prime Minister on National Security and Foreign Affairs, Sartaj Aziz said that Pakistan should not go after 'good' terrorists!
Militants not dangerous to Pakistan should not be targeted: Sartaj
Adviser to the Prime Minister on National Security and Foreign Affairs, Sartaj Aziz on Monday said that Pakistan should not target militants who do not threaten the country's security.
http://www.dawn.com/news/1145135
One would not want Pakistan to fail. One would want Pakistan to be a responsible country with stability and participate in international bonding. But does the world see anything like that happening?
Notwithstanding the terrorism exported to India with catastrophic consequences to India, their beheading of our soldiers, we have been magnanimous in continuing dialogue. And what have they been doing? Continuing terrorism and harbouring and encouraging terrorism. I wonder if that type of attitude where they are posing a threat to harmless Indian citizens should be encouraging us to be Jesus Christ and extending the other cheek.
I do not know King Ashoka except what he is said to be in the historical books. But then history can be shortsighted and agenda driven, whether you like it or not.
While history has a relevance, but it should not be taken to the final word. It has to also been seen with modern relevance and not by blind faith.
Take the case of Alexander the Great, who came to conquer India. It is said that his troops were weary and were suffering from malaria. That maybe one of the reason, but if one reads the book of the Effect of Logistics on Wars by a US General, one would realise that the major cause of Alexander returning was because his logistics which was being supported by galleys off the coast failed to touch port owing to the stormy weather in the Arabia Sea. So, every day something new crops up and history takes a new turn.