LF what are the views about Alexander leaving territory and Porus gaining the same. Was it really Alexander's patron gesture or was the situation not as convincing as his historians would want us to believe?
By the way how many know the etymology of the term - Hindu Kush?
Regards,.
Virendra
My view is that Alexander lost the battle to Porus here are a few reasons why:
1)Alexander rarely spared any adversary. A good example of this is his
2nd battle against Darius he gave clear instructions to his men to kill Darius do
not take him alive.
2)Alexander had learned his lesson from fighting Darius if a leader is left alive
he would possibly have to fight that leader again in the future if he learned this
lesson when he defeated Darius he would not make the same mistake again
with Porus.
3) Alexander usually placed Greeks in charge of territories he had conquered
who would collect taxes and tributaries for him and rule over that part of the empire
why is there no record of a Greek ruling that part of Punjab in Indian history??
Something like this would not have been ignored by both Indian and Greek
historians? I will get into more detail about Selucus who ruled a small territory which
historians speculate could have been porus's kingdom??
4) There may not have never been more than one battle other than at the Jhelum River
for a few reasons. Alexander had only 25% of his army remaining according to some
historians after this battle. The India armies were huge compared to what was remaining
of Alexander's armies and the Greeks calvary were no match for the elephants in the
Indian armies many which terrified the Greeks. Many Elephants lifted the horse and
soldier together and tossed them or crushed both.
5)Getting back to Selucus from above earlier I had stated earlier in this thread
why Alexander lost with regard to Selucus and ChandraGupta Maurya. I will repost those
points below:
The facts are clear:
A)winners do not give their Daughter to the loser-Selucus gave his Daughter to ChandraGupta.
B)the marriage was a peace treaty-why was a peace treaty needed if there was victory by selucus??
C)CGM gained territory from selecus again losers do not gain territory.
D) after marriage CGM gifted 500 war elephants which selucus used with great success in his meditarrean campaigns
losers in wars usually don't give gifts like this to the winners.