After Gilgit, PoK & Balochistan, 'AZAADI' slogans resonate in Pakistan's Sindh

sasum

Atheist but not Communists.
Senior Member
Joined
Jan 14, 2016
Messages
1,435
Likes
761
US didn't support freedom of Bangladesh as well, it happened anyways.
At that time Russia was an ally. Now, Modi signs logistics agreement with US, talks of strategic alliance with her and gets this kind of reactions.
 
  • Like
Reactions: G10

Chinmoy

Senior Member
Joined
Aug 12, 2015
Messages
8,734
Likes
22,725
Country flag
Do you expect US to support a different country of Kashmir ?
Its not about support and treaties and alliances. Its all about diplomacy. India is doing the same with Israel and Palestine.
 

Kshatriya87

Senior Member
Joined
Feb 12, 2014
Messages
10,136
Likes
16,039
Country flag
At that time Russia was an ally. Now, Modi signs logistics agreement with US, talks of strategic alliance with her and gets this kind of reactions.
In 71' the US president was Richard Nixon. He was an absolute racist and had incredible hatred for Indians and Indira. THAT was the reason why he bothered enough to send an aircraft carrier to India.

This time the case is completely different. US WILL NOT attack India or try to stop India with direct force. Maximum action they will take is diplomatic pressure. This is for the following changes that have happened since 71'

1. Indian military power has increased.
2. India has friendly relations with US.
3. Indian diaspora in US has increased several folds.
4. India is now a nuclear power.
5. US needs India to counter China.

NOTE: If US acts hostile to India in any way, they will lose the last hope of having a dependable & powerful ally in Asia. The only ones left will be Japan and SK.
 

Kshatriya87

Senior Member
Joined
Feb 12, 2014
Messages
10,136
Likes
16,039
Country flag
this Indiandefencenews is extremely Bogas website ......................

this news is at-least 1 month Old .

we dont know the strategies of USA or India or Russia .
Like every other powerful country, US also has 2 heads to show. One - diplomatic/government. Second - CIA/Intelligence.
 

sasum

Atheist but not Communists.
Senior Member
Joined
Jan 14, 2016
Messages
1,435
Likes
761
In 71' the US president was Richard Nixon. He was an absolute racist and had incredible hatred for Indians and Indira. THAT was the reason why he bothered enough to send an aircraft carrier to India.

This time the case is completely different. US WILL NOT attack India or try to stop India with direct force. Maximum action they will take is diplomatic pressure. This is for the following changes that have happened since 71'

1. Indian military power has increased.
2. India has friendly relations with US.
3. Indian diaspora in US has increased several folds.
4. India is now a nuclear power.
5. US needs India to counter China.

NOTE: If US acts hostile to India in any way, they will lose the last hope of having a dependable & powerful ally in Asia. The only ones left will be Japan and SK.
Wait till Hillary takes over (I am discounting Triumph's chance). Much of the bonhomie between US-India will vanish! Many agreements will remain only on paper, if not completely annulled.
 

Kshatriya87

Senior Member
Joined
Feb 12, 2014
Messages
10,136
Likes
16,039
Country flag
Wait till Hillary takes over (I am discounting Triumph's chance). Much of the bonhomie between US-India will vanish! Many agreements will remain only on paper, if not completely annulled.
Umm.. I don't think so. Hillary's campaign is all about supporting the minorities & immigrants. Exactly opposite to Trump's campaign). Even Modi (on his US visit) said that he supports Hillary.

Even if the agreements don't go forward, she wouldn't take any action against India. That's the point. Supporting India & signing agreements with India is on thing, attacking India or stopping India with force is another.
 

Tshering22

Sikkimese Saber
Senior Member
Joined
Aug 20, 2010
Messages
7,869
Likes
23,242
Country flag
Narendra Modi will give that final masterstroke as Indian PM...and he will do that before the 2019 elections.
HE better do it before China can enter POK. Otherwise retaking our old territory will be very difficult.
 

Tshering22

Sikkimese Saber
Senior Member
Joined
Aug 20, 2010
Messages
7,869
Likes
23,242
Country flag
why leave punjub
we should annex it too
That's because that is where all the chauvinistic crowd comes from.

We don't want that. Maybe take upto Nankana Sahib.

My wife is punjabi and she tells me the mentality people from that side of the border have. Mix that personality with Islam and you have the worst traits a person can have in our part of the world.

Let Pakistan remain its Punjabistan or whatever with only Punjab of their part minus the holy site for our Sikh brothers.
 

aditya10r

Mera Bharat mahan
Senior Member
Joined
Mar 19, 2016
Messages
5,718
Likes
11,618
Country flag
That's because that is where all the chauvinistic crowd comes from.

We don't want that. Maybe take upto Nankana Sahib.

My wife is punjabi and she tells me the mentality people from that side of the border have. Mix that personality with Islam and you have the worst traits a person can have in our part of the world.

Let Pakistan remain its Punjabistan or whatever with only Punjab of their part minus the holy site for our Sikh brothers.
Then let's build israeli styled settlements.
 

sasum

Atheist but not Communists.
Senior Member
Joined
Jan 14, 2016
Messages
1,435
Likes
761
My wife is punjabi and she tells me the mentality people from that side of the border have. Mix that personality with Islam and you have the worst traits a person can have in our part of the world.
Lakh taake ki baat!:india:...................................
 

mayfair

Senior Member
Joined
Feb 26, 2010
Messages
6,032
Likes
13,109
HE better do it before China can enter POK. Otherwise retaking our old territory will be very difficult.
Taking back PoK will unfortunately have to wait till Bakjab splinters and Baluchis secede. Moreover, a weakened China distracted by events elsewhere such as SCS is important too.

While all eyes are on Baluchi liberation, maybe we'll stroll into our rightful territory much like we did in Turtuk while the world witnessed the birth of Bangladesh.
 

LordOfTheUnderworlds

Senior Member
Joined
Feb 9, 2013
Messages
1,299
Likes
1,379
Country flag
I learned today that Baluchistan is a province with around 20,00,000 Marathi descendants. This province was forcefully merged with Pakistan in 1948. Since then there were 4 major revolt for independence in Balochistan. Three were led by people of Marathi descendants.

How these people of Marathi descendants went and settled in Balochistan?

In the third battle of Panipat, Marathas were defeated. It is estimated that around fifty to seventy five thousand soldiers of Pune's Peshwas were imprisoned and taken to Balochistan which was part of Afghanistan as slaves.

These people are even today known by following names -
1. Peshwani Maratha (relatives of Peshwas who were captured. It was assumed that one of the brother of then Peshwa was also captured and taken to Balochistan)
2. Bugti Maratha
3. Kalpar Maratha
4. Nothani Maratha
5. Shambani Maratha
6. Mosani Maratha
7. Shau Maratha.

There are 20 such castes which ends with Maratha. They are linked to caste system of then Maharashtra.

People of these caste even today call their mother Ayi (what Marathis call their mother) and not ammi jan. They worship Shivaji Maharaj and Peshwas even today.

Whenever reference of Maratha or slogan Har Har Mahadev, like are heard in Bollywood movies they stand and give such slogans.

Considering above, the development in Balochistan would be interesting to watch and observe as they are related to our own people who are leading the battle.

The above information can be verified based on around 20 books written by eminent historians in Marathi.

{Info here compiled by DV Sridharan}
That is whatsapp message so there would be exaggeration. Still whatever the numbers it is enough excuse to invade for protecting ethnic Indians like russia does in its neighbourhood.

Also India has moral right to invade to stop gross human rights violations/ crimes against humanity and genocide in baloochistan. US has invaded countries on far more trivial excuses and fake weapons of mass destruction. In this case we have real weapons of mass destruction in hands of proven terrorist country that openly threatens to use them.

So India has all the justification to liberate Baluchistan. All that is lacking is willpower and national consensus. You can't expect any more excuses than this to be given on platter.
 

Latest Replies

Global Defence

New threads

Articles

Top