A Tale of Two Ports: Chinese-Indian Rivalry Grows in the Arabian Sea

Discussion in 'West Asia & Africa' started by ejazr, Jan 11, 2011.

  1. ejazr

    ejazr Stars and Ambassadors Stars and Ambassadors

    Joined:
    Oct 8, 2009
    Messages:
    4,518
    Likes Received:
    1,378
    Location:
    Hyderabad and Sydney
    http://www.thejakartaglobe.com/opin...ndian-rivalry-grows-in-the-arabian-sea/416115

    If China wants to emancipate itself from transportation or military problems along Asia’s southern coastline, direct access to the Indian Ocean may be the solution.

    Sino-Indian rivalry in the Indian Ocean and India’s naval cooperation with the United States draw the world’s attention, but quietly, out of sight, a contest has been building in the Arabian Sea centered between two ports, one in Pakistan and the other in Iran. The first is backed by China, the second by India. The first, located in Gwadar, is intended to give China access to the Indian Ocean; the second, Chabahar, is supposed to connect India to Afghanistan and counter the first.

    The two ports represent longstanding rivalries in the region and anticipate an intense geostrategic competition.

    Gwadar, with its proximity to the vital sea lane between the Middle East and China, has strategic importance for China, especially for oil trade.

    If China wants to emancipate itself from transportation or military problems along Asia’s southern coastline, direct access to the Indian Ocean may be the solution.

    Direct access to the Indian Ocean would give China a strategic observation post and a key location for its navy. While Burma and Sri Lanka can offer substantial support, the country that can best help Beijing is Pakistan because of its lo cation and longtime friendship.

    India, feeling encircled, reacted to this development. In his recent book on the Indian Ocean, journalist Robert Kaplan writes that “the Indians’ answer to Sino-Pakistani cooperation at Gwadar was a giant new $8 billion naval base at Karwar, south of Goa on India’s Arabian coast, the first phase of which opened in 2005.”

    Karwar was only one part of the response.

    Another is Chabahar.

    In 2002, soon after China began work at Gwadar, India helped Iran to develop the port of Chabahar, located about 70 kilometers west of Gwadar.

    It should provide India with access to Afghanistan via the Indian Ocean.

    India, Iran and Afghanistan have signed an agreement to give Indian goods, heading for Central Asia and Afghanistan, preferential treatment and tariff reductions at Chabahar.

    Gwadar is located on the Gulf of Oman, close to the entrance of the Persian Gulf. Until 1958 it belonged to Oman, which gave this land to Pakistani rulers who expected that the location would contribute to what Kaplan calls “a new destiny.”

    When US President Richard Nixon visited Pakistan in 1973, Zulfikar Ali Bhutto sought US assistance to construct a new port at Gwadar, and reportedly offered the US Navy use of the facility.

    He was unsuccessful, and Pakistan then turned to China for help. Work started in 2002, and China has invested $200 million, dispatching 450 personnel for the first phase of the job completed in 2006 and resulting in a deep-sea port.

    The Port of Singapore Authority was selected to manage Gwadar in 2007.

    But it did not invest much money, and Pakistan decided to transfer port management to another institution, not yet selected but which will probably be Chinese.

    On Nov. 6, 2010, the Supreme Court of Pakistan asked the Gwadar Port Authority to seek cancellation of the concession agreement with the Port of Singapore Authority.

    At the same time, Pakistan and China contemplated developing the Karakorum Highway to connect China’s Xinjiang region with the Gilgit-Baltistan region of Pakistan.

    In 2006, a memorandum of understanding was signed between both countries to upgrade this road and connect Kashgar and Abbottabad.

    But the Karakorum Highway, the highest point of which passes at 4,693 meters, can only open between May and December. It’s also vulnerable to landslides, so large trucks may not use it easily.

    Pakistan and China also discussed building a 3,000-kilometer rail line between Kashgar and Gwadar, during President Asif Ali Zardari’s July 2010 visit with President Hu Jintao in Beijing, but the cost would be enormous, up to $30 million per kilometer in the highest mountains.

    In addition, Baluchistan is one of Pakistan’s most unstable provinces today because of the development of a nationalist movement with separatist overtones. Insurgents have already kidnapped and killed Chinese engineers in Gwadar.

    But China persists.

    More than a gateway to the Indian Ocean, Gwadar will provide Beijing with, first, a listening post from where the Chinese may exert surveillance on hyper-strategic sea links as well as military activities of the Indian and American navies in the region, and second, dual-use civilian-military facilities providing a base for Chinese ships and submarines.

    For the Indians, this is a direct threat.

    The Delhi-based Institute for Defense Studies and Analysis recently published a report on Pakistan, saying that the Gwadar port’s vicinity to the Straits of Hormuz “also has implications for India as it would enable Pakistan to exercise control over energy routes.”

    India responded by helping Iran with the port of Chabahar. Work on the Chabahar-Milak-Zaranj-Dilaram route from Iran to Afghanistan is in progress.

    India has already completed the 213-kilometer Zaranj-Dilaram section of the road in Afghanistan’s Nimroz province and is helping Iran to upgrade the Chabahar-Milak railroad.

    Developing railroads and port infrastructure near the border of Afghanistan could strengthen Iranian influence in Afghanistan, especially among the Shia and non-Pashtun ethnic groups.

    However, this Indo-Iranian project is bound to suffer from two problems.

    First, politically, Afghanistan is unstable and may not work with Iran and India if the Taliban or any Pakistan-supported government is restored.

    Chabahar is also part of one of Iran’s most volatile regions where Sunni insurgents opposed to the regime have launched repeated attacks.

    Second, the work is far behind schedule. In July 2010, Iranian Deputy Foreign Minister Mohd Ali Fathollahi said the port was functional, but has a capacity of only 2.5 million tons per year, whereas the target was 12 million tons.

    During the 16th Indo-Iranian Joint Commission meeting, attended by Iranian Finance Minister Seyed Shamseddin Hosseini and Indian External Affairs Minister S.M. Krishna, the latter pointed out that “Iran’s assistance in developing the Chabahar port has been slow until now,” and called for the pace to be quickened

    The connection between Gwadar and China remains distant, but it could become the Suez Canal of the 21st century. At the very least, this deep-sea port should provide Beijing with a strategic base soon.

    The Chinese move prompted India to react — hence the development of Chabahar.

    But in developing this port, New Delhi must factor in US attempts at isolating Iran because of Tehran’s nuclear policy. How far the Indo-Iranian rapprochement is compatible with cultivating an Indo-American alliance remains to be seen.

    The United States and India may agree on the need to counter growing Chinese influence in Gwadar, but they may also disagree on the policy India wants to pursue by joining hands with Iran.

    Iran itself may not want to take the risk of alienating China, a country that has supported Tehran, including its nuclear policy, until recently.


    Christophe Jaffrelot is a senior research fellow with the Center for International Studies and Research, Sciences Po/CNRS. Copyright YaleGlobal 2011, Yale Center for the Study of Globalization.
     
  2.  
  3. warriorextreme

    warriorextreme Senior Member Senior Member

    Joined:
    Sep 29, 2010
    Messages:
    1,369
    Likes Received:
    536
    Location:
    Mumbai
    nice insight..
    we need to build more naval bases and increase our fleets..
     
  4. Yusuf

    Yusuf GUARDIAN Administrator

    Joined:
    Mar 24, 2009
    Messages:
    24,274
    Likes Received:
    11,281
    Location:
    BANGalore
    The only difference and problem being that china has very strong relations with pak but India has of late had patchy relations with Iran
     
  5. ejazr

    ejazr Stars and Ambassadors Stars and Ambassadors

    Joined:
    Oct 8, 2009
    Messages:
    4,518
    Likes Received:
    1,378
    Location:
    Hyderabad and Sydney
    The Iran issue is something that will be a test for Indian diplomacy. Is India strong enough to stand up for its own interests and influence the lobby in the US Congress to its advantage? Or will it sit back and let oppurtunities slip by.

    Let me remind everyone that India probably paid the highest price after the US and Iraq in that tangle. The focus was shifted from Af-Pak allowing Mushrraf to go easy on India-centric militants. Afghanistan was left to the warlords that eventually led to the Taliban comeback. Iraq which use to supply about 10-12% of oil supplies to India was put into turmoil putting our energy supplies at risk. If India as a friend would have been able to influence the US using the Indian lobby or otherwise to not go to war in Iraq but focus on Af-Pak and finish the job here first, it would have resulted in tremendous boost for India strategically.

    Now with Iran, instead of the US applying sanctions and more sanctions with no result and harming our interests and influence on top of that, India could atleast initiate a dialouge between US and Iran if not a grand bargain and enhance its influence in the ME as well as the US.
     

Share This Page