BLA/BLF and other Baloch nationalist attacks and operations

Akshay Fenix

Regular Member
Joined
Jun 17, 2017
Messages
739
Likes
3,076
Country flag
jiwani759.jpg


At least two Pakistani naval officers were killed and three others injured after their vehicle was ambushed by four assailants on two motorbikes in the restive southwestern Balochistan province, the Dawn reported. The officers were transporting iftar items during a routine run from Jiwani city in the Gwadar district when the attack took place. “Four armed men on two motorcycles attacked the Naval vehicle and opened indiscriminate firing on it,” a Baluchistan government official said.

Following the attack, security has been tightened and a search operation was launched in the area to apprehend those involved in the attack. Reflecting on the incident, Balochistan Chief Minister Sanaullah Zehri directed the police to submit a report about the “terrorist” incident. “We will not bow down before the terrorists,” Zehri said in his condemnation statement.


No militant group has so far claimed responsibility for the attack on the officers. Baloch nationalists and Islamist militants are infamous for often carrying out attacks against the security forces in the province. The latest incident comes just few days after the ISIS claimed that it had killed two Chinese nationals, who had been kidnapped on May 24th from Jinnah town in Quetta.

Gwadar port and Baluchistan are the integral part of the China-Pakistan Economic Corridor and both countries have agreed to bolster security for the people, including Chinese nationals, working on different projects under the USD 50 billion project.

http://indianexpress.com/article/pa...d-three-injured-in-gwadar-gun-attack-4712225/
 

vinuzap

Regular Member
Joined
Nov 15, 2016
Messages
509
Likes
693
long live balochistan (earlier known as kalat which was which was forcefully annexed by pakistan along with NWFP)


NEHRU 'S BLUNDERS---STOPPING NWFP (North West Frontier Province) FROM JOINING INDIA

Rajee Kushwaha
/






THERE WAS ANGER AGAINST NEHRU FOR NOT LETTING North West Frontier Province JOIN INDIA!

Nehru had not only stopped Congressmen from participating in the refrendum but also supported Mountbatten's plans of only two options for the refrendum--i.e--either India or Pakistan. It must be noted that, then, Congress ( Khudai khidmatgar) had a majority in the newly elected state assembly of NWFP and there was no need for refrendum according to this party. Congress wanted to abstain from refrendum but the group of KHIDMATGAR CONGRESSMEN wanted third option of Independence. But this was opposed by Nehru under influence of Mountbatten, though MK Gandhi supported KHUDAI KHIDMATGAR. Thus, the Congress party, Khudai Khidmatgar included, refrained from taking part in the Plebiscite.

Muhammed Iqbal Chawla writes:----

"As the last Viceroy of India, Mountbatten presided over the transfer of power which involved both independence and the division of the subcontinent in 1947. While dividing India it was decided that the wish of the people through the democratic process is sought, for or against, inclusion within Pakistan. In the two major Muslim majority provinces of Bengal and Punjab this was determined by the vote of their representatives in the legislature. In the provinces of the NWFP, Baluchistan and Assam however this was determined by a referendum. The Congress had opted to abstain from the referendum in the NWFP, and its outcome was a heavy mandate for Pakistan but even after that the ruling Congress Ministry refused to resign. Mountbatten refrained from using his discretionary powers to dismiss Dr Khan Sahib’s ministry, consequently, the Government of Pakistan, after it came into being, dismissed it, for it believed that the Congress party had lost every legal or moral foundation to be in power as the people had given a clear verdict in favour of Pakistan and against the Congress government in the Referendum.------------------The author takes the position that Mountbatten, despite the controversy with which he is regarded in Pakistan, played an instrumental role in the accession of NWFP to Pakistan. This was by no means a forgone conclusion in the wake of the Muslim League’s poor showing in the 1946 Frontier Provincial elections.His decision that a referendum should be held enabled the Muslim League to galvanize popular sentiment for inclusion in Pakistan, despite the presence of a Congress ministry----"

Congress abstaining, along with Khudai Khidmatgar, a farce and a shameful farce , this referendum was. And the key reasons were:

A: It was not based on adult franchise, Voting was restricted
B. Not all Pakhtoons were allowed to participate in the referendum that would seal not only their fate but that of their brothers in Afghanistan
C. The tribal Pakhtoons were not allowed to vote. In the population of 3.5 Million only 0.6 Million were allowed to vote
D. 6 Tribal agencies were barred from it
E. The States of Sawat, Dir,Amb, and Chitral were also not allowed to participate

Any referendum that disenfranchises such a large number of population can never be called a legitimate exercise of “self determination”. It has no political, legal and moral authority whatsoever.

As Khudai khidmatgar of Abdul Ghaffar Khan boycotted the Plebiscite, the lone contender in the fray, the Muslim League, won the vote by default, as only 0.6 Millions (17%) out of 3.5 millions of the population were allowed to vote in the Plebiscite and only 51% (2,92 lakhs) of this voted. Muslim League got only 51% votes. The remaining votes of 49% were double stamped. Remember, 83% or nearly 29 lakhs did not participate and Muslim league had got only 51% of 17%, who were asked to vote.

The Results:

Population : 35 Lakhs
Number of people allowed : 5,72,799
Polled votes (51%): 2,92,118
For Pakistan (51.5%) 2,89,244
For India 2,874

51.5% of the allowed Voters , Voted for Pakistan.Is this the result of a referendum that sealed the fate of Millions of Pakhtoons? With the disenfranchisment of 29 lakhs, it can’t even be called a majority vote.

No one understands Nehru's motive, other than influence of Louis Mountbatten and his wife. Ever since PAKHTOONS have been a thorn in the flesh of Pakistan. Pakistan never had its writ run over seven tribal areas of FATA.

Had third option been allowed to Khudai Khidmatgars of an independent state , they would have participated in the Plebiscite. Then, they would have got 90% votes due to Khan Abdul Gaffar Khan and then NORTH WEST FRONTIER PROVINCE would have been Independent state. In any case, once the elected assembly had the majority, the need for refrendum was not understood. Like Bengal and Punjab, NWFP assembly should have decided on the fate of PATHANISTAN. But Nehru ditched Khan Abdul Ghaffar Khan.

As Wali Khan, son of late Abdul Ghaffar Khan wrote:

” In the ends, thus, one keeps coming back to the same conclusion that the British were keen on putting an Islamic halter round the socialist order in the north and were not prepared to permit any hurdle, Khudai Khidmatgars’ or whatever, in their way. In fact they were convinced that unless they removed all the nationalist and anti imperialist forces from their path would not be able to consummate their design.”

Was JL Nehru acting as a British agent ?
 

ProudIndian36

Tihar Jail
Banned
Joined
Jun 21, 2017
Messages
37
Likes
93
Country flag
I hope we are arming more Baluchis to kill those shameless pakjabis. BLA should also hit their planes, ships and other valuable equipment.
 

nongaddarliberal

Senior Member
Joined
Nov 1, 2016
Messages
3,907
Likes
22,145
Country flag
Let's be realistic. Balochistan's independence won't happen. The pakis won't give a damn about Human Rights and go all out if there is a major uprising, using fighter jets, artillery, helicopters, etc, of course with the full support of the chinese if needed, and the world media will just turn a blind eye like it always did. This is of course similar to how Kashmir will never be able to leave India either. All we can hope for is tit for tat. We can possibly raise Balochistan to the same intensity as they have done in Kashmir. Looking at a threat to their investment in Gwadar, we can possibly convince the Chinese to force the pakis to curb down their activities in Kashmir.
 

airtel

Senior Member
Joined
Dec 25, 2015
Messages
3,432
Likes
7,816
Country flag
Let's be realistic. Balochistan's independence won't happen. The pakis won't give a damn about Human Rights and go all out if there is a major uprising, using fighter jets, artillery, helicopters, etc, of course with the full support of the chinese if needed, and the world media will just turn a blind eye like it always did.

Nobody can stop an idea whose time has come.............:cool1::cool1:
 

Willy2

Regular Member
Joined
Feb 7, 2017
Messages
847
Likes
1,559
Was JL Nehru acting as a British agent ?
Wrong thread.....But yes, Nehru is very much British agent...British planted by them...They plan to establish Dominion from very beginning, establishing client state but once they lose control over military ,it's shattered ...
British always fearful about possible USSR intervention in Afghanistan...and socialistic India might able USSR to have a direct reach to IOR , it's the reason that in 1953 UK/USA plan coup in Iran to stop socialization of Iran .
To check India and USSR both , UK create Pakistan...it also covertly help Pakistan to get GB through coup against J&k , so that India can't get Afg border of J&K .
 

Latest Replies

Global Defence

Articles

Top