Obama makes surprise trip to Afghanistan to sign key pact, mark bin Laden raid
Obama makes surprise trip to Afghanistan to sign key pact, mark bin Laden raid - The Washington Post
KABUL — President Obama outlined his plan to end America’s longest foreign war during a visit here Tuesday colored by election-year politics and economic uncertainty, declaring that “this time of war began in Afghanistan, and this is where it will end.”
“We have traveled through more than a decade under the dark cloud of war,” Obama said from a U.S. military base. “In the predawn darkness of Afghanistan, we can see the light of a new day on the horizon.”
Obama delivered his address at the end of an unannounced visit here to sign a long-term partnership agreement with the Afghan government and to mark, alongside American troops at Bagram Air Base outside this capital city, the one-year anniversary of the raid that killed Osama bin Laden.
The trip came amid criticism at home that Obama is using the raid to advance his reelection prospects by featuring his decision to launch the mission in campaign videos and other political settings. As Republican critics have called his leadership abroad weak, Obama has held up the bin Laden operation as evidence that he is willing to make risky decisions to protect U.S. interests.
His arrival here was timed to make the “strategic partnership agreement” official before an important NATO summit this month — and, in the words of one senior administration official traveling with Obama, to take advantage of “a resonant day for both our countries on the anniversary of the death of bin Laden.”
Obama used his time with the troops to emphasize the sacrifices they and their families have made over more than a decade of conflict, saying that in doing so they made the bin Laden mission successful and put the long war on a path to its conclusion.
The hours-long visit was directed almost entirely toward an American audience, unfolding during pre-prime time hours in the United States while most Afghans slept. It also served as a detente after some of the tensest months in U.S.-Afghan relations.
Since February, American service members have inadvertently burned Korans at a U.S. military base, Army Staff Sgt. Robert Bales allegedly murdered 17 civilians in Kandahar, and at least 18 NATO troops have been slain by their Afghan counterparts. In addition to infuriating Afghans, the incidents have contributed to a rising war fatigue at home.
Opinion polls show that most Americans no longer believe the Afghan war is worth fighting. But the agreement and troop withdrawal schedule allows Obama to say during a difficult re-election race that he has ended the war in Iraq and is winding down the one in Afghanistan, a position even a majority of Republicans now favors.
“The Iraq War is over. The number of our troops in harm’s way has been cut in half, and more will be coming home soon,” Obama said. “We have a clear path to fulfill our mission in Afghanistan, while delivering justice to al-Qaeda.”
Obama campaigned in 2008 on a pledge to end the Iraq war, which he did in December, and to strengthen the U.S. effort here at a time when the Taliban appeared resurgent and al Qaeda active in the border regions with Pakistan.
With opposition to the Afghan war building within his own party, Obama announced the beginning of the end of the U.S. mission last year by adopting a withdrawal timeline more rapid than some of his commanders recommended.
The decision drew criticism from some of his Republican rivals, including the presumptive nominee Mitt Romney, that Obama was calibrating his war strategy to the election calendar. Romney, who on Tuesday gave Obama a share of the credit for bin Laden’s killing during an appearance in New York City, has said the U.S. goal should be to defeat the Taliban on the battlefield.
Obama on Tuesday night laid out a different ambition.
“Our goal is not to build a country in America’s image, or to eradicate every vestige of the Taliban,” he said. “These objectives would require many more years, many more dollars, and many more American lives. Our goal is to destroy al-Qaeda, and we are on a path to do exactly that.”
The last of the 33,000 troops Obama dispatched to Afghanistan at the end of 2009 will head home at the end of September. Senior administration officials said Tuesday that, while no specific future troop levels have been determined, a “steady reduction” will follow over the next two years.
Obama’s timeline calls Afghan security forces to take the lead in combat operations by the end of next year. All U.S. troops are scheduled to leave by the end of 2014, except for trainers to assist Afghan security forces and a small contingent of troops with a specific mission to combat al Qaeda through counter-terrorism missions.
In his remarks, Obama emphasized that the United States will not seek permanent military bases in Afghanistan, a country that for centuries has fiercely opposed foreign interlopers.
Those trainers and special operations troops that remain beyond 2014 would live on Afghan bases. Senior administration officials said the agreement is meant to send a signal to the Taliban that they cannot “wait out” the international presence that is supporting a still-fragile Afghan government.
“The goal I set to defeat al Qaeda and deny it a chance to rebuild is now within reach,” Obama said.
Traveling overnight and landing in darkness, Obama arrived at Bagram air base, 30 miles north of Kabul, at 10:20 p.m. local time and boarded a helicopter for a flight into the capital. He arrived at the Afghan presidential palace just after 11 p.m. for a meeting with President Hamid Karzai, who has had a contentious relationship with Obama over the years.
“I’m here to affirm the bond between our two countries and to thank Americans and Afghans who have sacrificed so much over these last ten years,” Obama said. “Neither Americans nor the Afghan people asked for this war yet for a decade we’ve stood together.”
In signing the agreement, cemented after 20 months of difficult negotiations, Obama said that “the Afghan people and the world should know that Afghanistan has a partner in the United States.”
Karzai has long requested reassurance from the U.S. president that American support would not wane after 2014. The agreement commits the president to ask Congress for funds to support Afghanistan through 2024, but it does not set a specific amount of annual aid.
It is designed to promote Afghan security forces training, a reconciliation and reintegration process for Taliban fighters who leave the battlefield, and regional stability with a focus on improving relations with Pakistan. A second senior administration official, who also spoke on condition of anonymity, called it “a crucial component to bring the war to end responsibly.”
In speaking with troops after the signing ceremony, Obama sounded notes of praise and hope.
“I know the battle is not yet over, some of your buddies are going to get injured, some of your buddies may get killed. And there’s going to be heartbreak and pain ahead,” he said. “But there is a light on the horizon because of the sacrifices you made.”
Karzai has had a tempestuous relationship with American leaders in recent years, making demands that U.S. officials have seen as unrealistic and maligning Washington for trying to strong-arm reconciliation efforts with the Taliban.
At the heart of Karzai’s discontent were two key issues that appeared to have the potential to obstruct a long-term partnership: the continuation of controversial night operations and the handling of a U.S. military prison at Bagram.
This year, at Karzai’s behest, the United States agreed to cede control of both the night raids and the detention center to Afghan security forces — concessions that paved the way for the long-term partnership agreement.
But beyond the substantive reforms that Karzai has demanded, Afghan officials say their president has also longed for more access to Washington — a wish that Obama’s rare visit to Kabul may have sought to satisfy.
Administration officials said Obama wanted to sign the deal in Kabul to highlight Afghanistan sovereignty and the changing nature of the U.S.-Afghan relationship.
“Neither Americans nor the Afghan people asked for this war, yet for a decade we’ve stood together,” Obama said after signing the agreement. “Today, with the signing of the strategic partnership agreement, we look forward to a future of peace.”
Americans have not yet outlined what the U.S. troop presence will look like beyond 2014, and NATO has yet to specify its long-term financial commitment to the Afghan security forces. That topic will be a focal point of the NATO summit in Chicago later this month.
U.S. military officials say they have been impressed with the improvement of the Afghan security forces - an assessment echoed Tuesday by administration officials traveling with Obama.
But the Taliban remains strong in both the south and the east, penetrating key security barriers in both Kabul and Kandahar — the country’s two most important cities — within the past month. In a coordinated assault on April 15, more than 35 militants staged simultaneous attacks on high-profile targets in several cities across eastern Afghanistan, including the capital.
“Let us finish the work at hand,” Obama said, “and forge a just and lasting peace.”
Wilson reported from Washington. Staff writers Karen DeYoung and Ed O’Keefe in Washington contributed to this report.
Publicity stunt. He wants his domestic audience to know that he is the man who got OBL. Can't blame him. He also gets to keep the Nobel Prize, that he got in the hope he will do something someday.
Well, others spoke big - dead or alive.
But our man Joe delivered - OBL dead and dumped in the sea into nowhere!
Peace and stability in Afghanistan is another matter and not so easily done!
Stars and Ambassadors
Why they dumped OBL's body in sea?
It didn't work for Megatron!
Now then, how well is OBAMA protected in his visit to Afghanistan as there have been suicide blasts carried on by the terrorists.
It's going to be increasingly difficult for Pak to get its "strategic depth" in Astan. One thing remains for Afghans and that is a declaration of Major Non NATO Ally. That will seal it for Pak.
Users Browsing this Thread
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
By Vishwarupa in forum China
Last Post: 10-04-12, 01:37 PM
By W.G.Ewald in forum International Politics
Last Post: 02-11-11, 07:43 PM
By SHASH2K2 in forum International Politics
Last Post: 05-05-11, 11:51 AM
By EagleOne in forum Politics & Society
Last Post: 26-10-10, 03:56 PM
By Yusuf in forum Subcontinent & Central Asia
Last Post: 29-03-10, 04:06 PM