History exposed by Nazam Sethi
DFI Buddha
I am surprised how come Najem Sethi is not considered a anti-pak-muslim and a fatwa issued on his head?
Veteran Member
I am surprised how come Najem Sethi is not considered a anti-pak-muslim and a fatwa issued on his head?
so many times.that's y he spends most of his time out side pak land especially USA and Dubai
Veteran Member
i was going to start watching but not now.
didn't expect paaji to post paki theories
what is being discussed in the video ?
what is says is not paki theory. most of the things he says was pro Indian
Elite Member
what is says is not paki theory. most of the things he says was pro Indian
Not in the first two parts of this video mate.
Veteran Member
1. He claims that Hari Singh had decided to join India whereas in fact Hari Singh was inclined to stay independent. Pakis sent in tribal invaders with the twin aim of grabbing Kashmir and keeping the Pashtuns of NFWP occupied elsewhere. Hari Singh appealed to India for help, to which the reply was, accede to us and we'll send in our forces. He signed the instrument of accession and that is how Kashmir became a part of India. Sethi did not say a word about this.
2. Plebiscite- It was India who went to UN. The chief requirements for plebiscite was that Pakistan withdraw its forces from the state and the demography be restored to what it was pre-1947. He claims that India went back on their word. No mention of the treachery by Major Brown of the Gilgit scouts.
3. Hyderabad and Junagadh- Refuses to accede that all bets were off after Pakis attacked Kashmir. It was only after this invasion that India decided to intervene militarily in the two princely mandates. Fails to mention the reign of terror by Razakars in Hyderabad and the people's movement against the Nizam. There was no such rebellion in Kashmir. He also fails to mention that the diwan of Junagadh..Bhutto ka baap was the one who asked India to annex the state after the Nawab had fled with the treasury. And one more thing, Sethi sahab very conveniently forgot to mention that there was a gentlemen's agreement between the two countries that neither will have any major enclaves in the other's territory (Cooch Behar was a complicated thing).
4. Paki intruders had achieved sod all in Kashmir in 1965, he makes it sound as if they were winning against the Kafirs.
I am sure there will be more as I watch more of ther interview.
some what agree with u
Moderator
Not in the first two parts of this video mate.
Well he can't go as far as we want him to go, can he?
He wants to live yet I guess. Hassan Nisar and Najam Sethi are humans. For all their grand standing, boldness and insight they can still be wrong and biased sometimes, just like anyone else.
Regards,
Virendra
I want the pure ones to make an example of the likes of nazam Sethi and Nissar in such a manner that nobody will ever want to be like them. These people can potentially wake up and shake up a country which is almost dead in mind and soul. I don't want this monster to wake up and challenge India.
DFI Buddha
what is says is not paki theory. most of the things he says was pro Indian
Its not pro-india he is just stateing the facts. It sounds pro-india that is all, i think?
Thread Information
Users Browsing this Thread
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Similar Threads
By ejazr in forum Pakistan
Replies: 0
Last Post: 17-03-12, 09:49 AM
By thakur_ritesh in forum China
Replies: 4
Last Post: 29-12-11, 11:23 AM
By Singh in forum Pakistan
Replies: 1
Last Post: 13-10-11, 12:45 AM
By Tshering22 in forum Pakistan
Replies: 13
Last Post: 05-08-11, 12:53 AM
By ajtr in forum General Multimedia
Replies: 7
Last Post: 04-11-10, 05:52 PM