Abhi9
Regular Member
- Joined
- Aug 25, 2012
- Messages
- 562
- Likes
- 1,582
Foie gras is not halalThey probably meant foie gras when they pledged to eat grass
ON SAME TOPIC
Airbus A380 a Magnificient plane ideal for PIA
Jf ThunderOffline
why dont we buy a Concord?
Pakistan-TorontoToronto - Pakistan
New York - Pakistan
Chicago - Pakistan
Los Angeles - Pakistan
Boston - Pakistan
Tokyo - Pakistan
Beijing- Pakistan
The whole rocket weighs 414,000kgs but it can only only carry 2 tonnes. LOLOL
In any case, JF-17 can perform anti-satellite role as well, don't forget that. In a war, all your satellites are juicy targets for the Thunder! All your communications and spy sats will be knocked out by the JF-17 the moment war starts. So there is no advantage to India from these satellites in case of war.
But of course Fair Pakistani scientists are much better than Indian scientists, what is the problem with puke space program?So inefficient rocket. Its so big but can only carry 2000kgs. JF-17 can carry 3.7 tonnes of payload!!
these pukesBecause india starts arms race and suparco resources go to the army instead.
i dont think they understand the diff between geo and leo satellite.All your communications and spy sats will be knocked out by the JF-17 the moment war starts
so JF-17 will travel 35,000km above space to shoot down satellite
this was an epic
shows madrasa educationi dont think they understand the diff between geo and leo satellite.
Source Please!!Guys it seems some people in pukeland forgot their burnol after the GSLV launch.
One intelligent user gives us his views on how they are going nullify our satellite advantage.
Further on the efficiency of The GSLV vs JF-17
But of course Fair Pakistani scientists are much better than Indian scientists, what is the problem with puke space program?
This is also eloquently answered
these pukes
open PDF brother u will find gems like these every whereSource Please!!
its on Pedophile forumSource Please!!
The reason for this nomenclature is, Pakistan has this concept of "good terrorists and bad terrorists". Any terror group that targets its neighbours such as India and Afghanistan is a "good terrorist group", for example Lashkar-E-Tayyba. Any group which provides Pakistan "strategic depth" in Afghanistan are "good terrorists", for example, Afghan Taliban. However, if the terrorist group demands Sharia law within Pakistan and attacks Pakistan administration/Army, they become "bad terrorists", for example TTP (Pakistan Taliban).i really dont think that pakistan is a quote "failed and terrorist state" .
they are trying to wipe out the terrorist organizations but as long as they have relation with a terrorist country like saudi arabia (for gods sake who names a country after a family) i doubt those efforts will suffice as we are seeing the results .....
daily attacks on the border of iran , india are just some examples . u guys should be happy as the pakistani gov. has secured much of its border with india !!
they think that as iran is also a muslim country they have no obligation whatsoever to secure iranian border !!!
anyhow to be fair i agree that there are some rogue elements in pakistani govt. that not only dont fight terrorism but also campaign it !!!
but calling pakistan a failed terrorist state is not only not fair but also somehow illogical .
this is my opinion though .
It's not the pakistani govt.....but ISI and paki army which is directly responsible for Global terrorism!i really dont think that pakistan is a quote "failed and terrorist state" .
they are trying to wipe out the terrorist organizations but as long as they have relation with a terrorist country like saudi arabia (for gods sake who names a country after a family) i doubt those efforts will suffice as we are seeing the results .....
daily attacks on the border of iran , india are just some examples . u guys should be happy as the pakistani gov. has secured much of its border with india !!
they think that as iran is also a muslim country they have no obligation whatsoever to secure iranian border !!!
anyhow to be fair i agree that there are some rogue elements in pakistani govt. that not only dont fight terrorism but also campaign it !!!
but calling pakistan a failed terrorist state is not only not fair but also somehow illogical .
this is my opinion though .
as i said there are some rogue elements in their gov. behind this .The reason for this nomenclature is, Pakistan has this concept of "good terrorists and bad terrorists". Any terror group that targets its neighbours such as India and Afghanistan is a "good terrorist group", for example Lashkar-E-Tayyba. Any group which provides Pakistan "strategic depth" in Afghanistan are "good terrorists", for example, Afghan Taliban. However, if the terrorist group demands Sharia law within Pakistan and attacks Pakistan administration/Army, they become "bad terrorists", for example TTP (Pakistan Taliban).
A vast majority of terror attacks worldwide are traced back to Pakistan. Pakistan created the Taliban, they created Jihadi groups to wreck havoc in Kashmir, they produce more terrorists than engineers or doctors, and their primary export is terrorism.
In light of these facts, I would not hesitate in calling them a terrorist state. As far as "failed state" goes, that is a subjective opinion. But terrorist state - definitely they are one.
P.S. Pakistan has NOT "secured" the Indian border. India has spent every penny on the border fence and border security infrastructure. Pakistan would have been happy to constantly send terrorists to India as they have always been doing.
i assume you dont always insult pakistanis like that ......a perfect Idiom for being a whore / slut is pakistaning...... a good one whoever toiled this word