PAK DA - Russian Fifth Generation Steath Bomber
Founding Member
the reason for not going for a heavy bomber domestically is .....hell we need our own light bomber first
Regular Member
@ Yusuf what can I say about your this thing can also that logic.
I can find tons use's for a strategic bomber just against pakis and Chinese.
IF i find time I would start a thread about how can we use a Steath Bomber in our present scenario.
@ Folk Hero, Yusuf's real mission as a RAW agent is to get all of us to start thinking critically. Most of his doctrines have huge holes in them that are not very obvious but are there on purpose and for a purpose. He is serving the purpose of waking up a lot of us.
GUARDIAN
@ Yusuf what can I say about your this thing can also that logic.
I can find tons use's for a strategic bomber just against pakis and Chinese.
IF i find time I would start a thread about how can we use a Steath Bomber in our present scenario.
Go ahead. Tell me how.
Founding Member
@ Yusuf what can I say about your this thing can also that logic.
I can find tons use's for a strategic bomber just against pakis and Chinese.
IF i find time I would start a thread about how can we use a Steath Bomber in our present scenario.
Folk hero a stealth bomber is not necessarily a Strategic bomber.
Folk hero a stealth bomber is not necessarily a Strategic bomber.
Yes but Strategic is not necessarily nuclear either.
GUARDIAN
@ Folk Hero, Yusuf's real mission as a RAW agent is to get all of us to start thinking critically. Most of his doctrines have huge holes in them that are not very obvious but are there on purpose and for a purpose. He is serving the purpose of waking up a lot of us.
Still waiting for a lot of people to wake up
Founding Member
Yes but Strategic is not necessarily nuclear either.
Normally a Nuke is a strategic bomb but if a tactical bomber ferries it the bomber do not turns a strategic bomber,maybe the mission will be named as strategic mission.
Still waiting for a lot of people to wake up The only way to progress is to debate, Yusuf. National interests come above everything else. We both have our perspectives but everybody's end goal is the progress and security of the nation. Thats all that matters ultimately.
Defence Professionals/ DFI member of 2011
...Strategic is not necessarily nuclear either.
B-2 Spirit Stealth Bomber - Airforce Technology
The B-2 is a low-observable, strategic, long-range, heavy bomber capable of penetrating sophisticated and dense air-defence shields. It is capable of all-altitude attack missions up to 50,000ft, with a range of more than 6,000nm unrefuelled and over 10,000nm with one refuelling, giving it the ability to fly to any point in the world within hours...An assessment published by the USAF showed that two B-2s armed with precision weaponry can do the job of 75 conventional aircraft...The aircraft carries all its weapons internally and is fitted with two separate weapons bays in the centre of the aircraft. The B-2 has the capacity to carry up to 40,000lb of weapons, including conventional and nuclear weapons, precision-guided munitions, gravity bombs and a range of maritime weapons. Each weapons bay is equipped with a rotary launcher and two bomb-rack assemblies. In tests, the B-2 successfully released B-61 and B-83 nuclear and mk84 conventional bombs from the rotary rocket launcher, and mk82 and CBU-87 conventional weapons from the bomb racks. The B61-11 is an earth-penetrating nuclear bomb for use against deeply buried and hardened targets. The B83 is a strategic free-fall nuclear bomb.
The B-2 can also carry the AGM-129 advanced cruise missile, which is a strategic cruise missile with a range estimated at up to 1,500 miles.
Libya crisis: B2 stealth bombers on 25 hour flight from Missouri to Tripoli | Mail Online
Founding Member
Libertarian-Capitalist
We dont need a Stealth bomber for even the 2030s but I think we may need them by 2050s. But for that, we have to start researching now
GUARDIAN
We dont need a Stealth bomber for even the 2030s but I think we may need them by 2050s. But for that, we have to start researching now Explain the reason why we will not need till 2030 and will need in 2050?
Founding Member
Can any one give a scenario where we might need a carpet bombing?
Thread Information
Users Browsing this Thread
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Similar Threads
By nia in forum Europe and Russia
Replies: 0
Last Post: 14-09-10, 11:00 PM