UK likely to cut 1 billion pound aid bill to India

Joined
Feb 16, 2009
Messages
29,799
Likes
48,278
Country flag
UK likely to cut 1 billion pound aid bill to India - India News - IBNLive

London: Under pressure to slash its annual financial assistance to India, cash-strapped British government is likely to cut its one billion-pound aid bill to the country. Justine Greening, who took over as Development Secretary last month, said she wants to see Britain's links to richer developing nations become about business, rather than hand-outs.
Greening's comments came amid pressure on her to get better value for money from Britain's 12 billion-pound annual spending on countries like China and India, which have their own space programme. Signalling that India will be a target for cuts, she said, "We should recognise that as countries get richer, we need to be responsible about how we transition in our relationship with them from aid to trade."
"Those are the discussions that I am having with the Indian government at the moment," Greening said at the Tory Party conference in Birmingham. Greening also pledged to stop programmes that are not working because of corruption or inefficiency, amid criticism of many old schemes.

"I'm going to take a new approach to ensure that every pound we spend has the biggest possible impact," she was quoted as saying by 'The Telegraph'. "That may well mean stopping programmes where I don't think they are working and putting the money elsewhere." Prime Minister David Cameron has come under criticism for promising to keep spending 0.7 per cent of GDP on foreign aid during the recession.
There is growing unrest among backbenchers in the party and Lord Ashcroft, a major donor and Number 10 adviser, recently called for the "golden taps to be turned off". Greening said she is planning to take a more ruthless look at cost control but added it was "smart" for Britain to spend money on aid to help international security.

"I believe in development," she said. "It is in all our interests for countries around the world to be stable and secure, to have educated and healthy populations, and to have growing economies." She also pledged to make sure the European Union spends its money more wisely.
"I don't think it's right that the EU still gives money to those countries higher up the income scale, when we've taken the decision to target the poorest," Greening was quoted as saying by the paper.
 

Bangalorean

Ambassador
Joined
Nov 28, 2010
Messages
6,233
Likes
6,853
Country flag
OK good. Finally! So now I hope they do it fast, and the ------- moaning about "aid, aid, aid" is given a rest.
 

sob

Mod
Joined
May 4, 2009
Messages
6,425
Likes
3,805
Country flag
Good high time they got their own economy on order again. That should be the priority for their government.

But what will happen to the British exports to india which come under the aid umbrella.
 

EzioAltaïr

Regular Member
Joined
Aug 27, 2012
Messages
257
Likes
74
OMG!! They will no longer give us the annual 280 million pounds.

How will we fund our $1.25 billion Space program, and the $2 billion Aircraft Carriers, not to mention our $9.5 billion Scorpenes. We need that heavenly aid from Britain that multiplies and funds our entire government. :rotflmao:
 

parijataka

Senior Member
Joined
Oct 15, 2011
Messages
4,916
Likes
3,751
Country flag
I think this aid is mostly being given to NGOs engaged in education, health etc, many in mineral rich tribal areas. One such NGO, Action Aid with which ex IAS Harsh Mander was associated, prepares reports on condition of minorities in India while ignoring the same in Pakistan and Bangladesh where it also operates. What is the idea behind such activities.

Govt of India should monitor strictly the activities of all foreign NGOs or if possible ban foreign NGOs like Russia has done.
 

spikey360

Crusader
Senior Member
Joined
Jan 19, 2011
Messages
3,453
Likes
6,390
Country flag
Good. Better use that money to look after poor in the streets of Britain. Bharatvarsh got along fine before the British, we certainly wouldn't be any worse off without them.
But, the nation is greatful for any genuine humanitarian aims this aid achieved.
 

thakur_ritesh

Ambassador
Joined
Feb 19, 2009
Messages
4,435
Likes
1,733
Why do we even have to wait for others to shut down the aid programs, it should be the moral obligation of the government of the day to do it, definitely so when the government coffers are brimming with cash.

It is because we allow all such activity, that we remain vulnerable to all sorts of exploits by the donor. With aid comes whole host of organizations and people in various forms who drop by with agendas that far exceed than what they have been assigned to do.

Lessons be learnt and we say a thank you to all the aid programs that are run in this country, irrespective of who the donor is, what the intention of the donor is, and whether the donor comes across as arrogant or polite.

The average bill is to the tune of 2-2.5b usd annually and the GoI has enough budgetary resources to fill in the void created. Each year our annual budget grows by around 20%, and in usd terms by 50-80b usd, enough to accommodate 3b usd here and there, wherever the need be. As such the subsidy bill is being significantly capped, which would leave the government with much more resources.

It's not the taunts, which make the headlines, that are embarrassing, but the exploits which we allow willingly.
 

Armand2REP

CHINI EXPERT
Senior Member
Joined
Dec 17, 2009
Messages
13,811
Likes
6,734
Country flag
About the only thing this aid achieved was lining corrupt NGOs and babus pockets. Good riddance to dirty money.
 

farhan_9909

Tihar Jail
Banned
Joined
Aug 30, 2012
Messages
5,895
Likes
497
doesnt matter since India get 2.1 billions from other countries as well
 

sob

Mod
Joined
May 4, 2009
Messages
6,425
Likes
3,805
Country flag
The reason why most of the developed countries give loans to India is that, we are one of the few countries in the world who have never faulted on the repayments. These countries get a reasonable guaranteed return on their money, unlike some other countries.

Also not all aid is in cash, in fact most of the aid is in form of goods from the donor country. Actual cash component is very small. This is another way of promoting the domestic industry and giving an export thrust to their own economy. There are hardly any moral reasons for the aid.
 

jackprince

Turning into a frog
Senior Member
Joined
Mar 30, 2009
Messages
4,950
Likes
16,829
Country flag
good riddance!!!

there's somewhere a thread with detail discussion on the so called British "AID". Can someone merge it with that. The discussion, with proof in form of articles, reveals how that aid were not aid at all, but self-serving mission of f-ing Britain.
 

jackprince

Turning into a frog
Senior Member
Joined
Mar 30, 2009
Messages
4,950
Likes
16,829
Country flag
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2096628/British-foreign-aid-India-tells-Britain-dont-need-peanuts-offer-us.html
David Cameron was under intense pressure last night to slash the £1billion in aid Britain gives to India after the country said it no longer wanted the money.
India's finance minister Pranab Mukherjee said the booming country should 'voluntarily' give up the £280million a year it receives from Britain.
He told the Indian parliament: 'We do not require the aid. It is a peanut in our total development spending.'

Chancellor of the Exchequer George Osborne, left, shakes hands with India's Finance Minister Pranab Mukherjee on a visit to London in July last year
It also emerged that in a leaked memo dating from 2010 India's then foreign minister Nirupama Rao suggested India should not accept any further aid from Britain's Department for International Development because of the 'negative publicity of Indian poverty promoted by DFID'.
Sources in Delhi suggested British officials begged India to accept the aid. One commented: 'They said British ministers had spent political capital justifying the aid to their electorate.


Read more: British foreign aid: India tells Britain 'we don't need the peanuts you offer us' | Mail Online
Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook
 

drkrn

Senior Member
Joined
Apr 15, 2010
Messages
2,455
Likes
902
OMG!! They will no longer give us the annual 280 million pounds.

How will we fund our $1.25 billion Space program, and the $2 billion Aircraft Carriers, not to mention our $9.5 billion Scorpenes. We need that heavenly aid from Britain that multiplies and funds our entire government. :rotflmao:
scorpenes for 9.5 billion$:shocked: is this true?
 

H.A.

Senior Member
Joined
Dec 24, 2011
Messages
1,445
Likes
687
OMG!! They will no longer give us the annual 280 million pounds.

How will we fund our $1.25 billion Space program, and the $2 billion Aircraft Carriers, not to mention our $9.5 billion Scorpenes. We need that heavenly aid from Britain that multiplies and funds our entire government. :rotflmao:
Add the corruption to that list....it will be time before the claim for it....:becky:
 

Singh

Phat Cat
Super Mod
Joined
Feb 23, 2009
Messages
20,311
Likes
8,403
Country flag
Indian NGOs should bombard UK media with ads showcasing poverty and emotionally blackmailing them :troll:
 

Latest Replies

Global Defence

New threads

Articles

Top