We need to develop this port as fast as possible as this give us direct land access to Afghanistan bypassing Pakistan. Also it is the only alternate port to Gwadar.
Looking at the long term implications, if and when there is a regime change in Iran, India then should act as a bridge between the west and Iran, so that NATO gets access to this route to supply it's troops in Afghanistan.
Behesti Port,Bay 2, Chabahar, IRAN
A 'lenj' near Chabahar port
Chabahar port view
LIPAR View, From Bay, Chabahar, IRAN
GULF view From Bay
A Chinese-Indian Rivalry for the Arabian Sea
By Christophe Jaffrelot
Sino-Indian rivalry in the Indian Ocean and India's naval cooperation with the US draw the world's attention. But quietly, out of sight, a contest has been building in the Arabian Sea centered between two ports, one based in Pakistan and the other in Iran. The first is backed by China, the second by India. The first, located in Gwadar, is intended to give China access to the Indian Ocean; the second, Chabahar, is supposed to connect India to Afghanistan and counter the first. The two ports represent longstanding rivalries in the region and anticipation for intense geo-strategic competition.
Gwadar, with its proximity to the vital sea lane between the Middle East and China, has strategic importance for China, especially for oil trade. If China wants to emancipate itself from transportation or military problems along Asia's southern coastline, direct access to the Indian Ocean may be the solution.
Direct access to the India Ocean would give China a strategic post of observation and a key location for its navy. While Myanmar and Sri Lanka can offer substantial support, the country that can best help Beijing is Pakistan because of its location and long-time friendship.
India, feeling encircled, reacted to this development. In his recent book on the Indian Ocean, journalist Robert Kaplan writes that "the Indians' answer to Sino-Pakistani cooperation at Gwadar was a giant new $8 billion naval base at Karwar, south of Goa on India's Arabian coast, the first phase of which opened in 2005."
Karwar was only one part of the response to Gwadar. The other one is Chabahar. In 2002 India helped Iran to develop the port of Chabahar, located 72 kilometers west of Gwadar, soon after China began work at Gwadar.
Chabahar should provide India with access to Afghanistan via the Indian Ocean. India, Iran and Afghanistan have signed an agreement to give Indian goods, heading for Central Asia and Afghanistan, preferential treatment and tariff reductions at Chabahar.
Gwadar is located on the Gulf of Oman, close to the entrance of the Persian Gulf. Until 1958 it belonged to Oman, which gave this land to Pakistani rulers who expected that the location would contribute to what Kaplan calls "a new destiny."
When President Richard Nixon visited Pakistan in 1973, Zulfikar Ali Bhutto sought US help to construct a new port at Gwadar, and reportedly offered the US Navy use of the facility. He was unsuccessful, and Pakistan then turned to China for help. Work started in 2002, and China has invested $200 million, dispatching 450 personnel for the first phase of the job completed in 2006 and resulting in a deep-sea port.
The Port of Singapore Authority was selected to manage Gwadar in 2007. But it did not invest much money, and Pakistan decided to transfer port management to another institution, not yet selected but which will probably be Chinese. On 6 November 2010 the Supreme Court of Pakistan asked the Gwadar Port Authority to seek cancellation of the concession agreement with the Port of Singapore Authority.
At the same time, Pakistan and China contemplate developing the Karakorum Highway to connect China's Xinjiang and Gilgit-Baltistan region of Pakistan. In 2006, a memorandum of understanding was signed between both countries to upgrade this road and connect Kashgar and Abbottabad. But the Karakorum Highway, the highest point of which passes at 4,693 meters, can open between May and December. It's also vulnerable to landslides, so large trucks may not use it easily.
Pakistan and China also discussed building a 3,000-kilometer rail line between Kashgar and Gwadar, during President Asif Ali Zardari's July 2010 visit with President Hu Jintao in Beijing. The cost would be enormous, up to $30 million per kilometer in the highest mountains.
In addition, Baluchistan is one of Pakistan's most unstable provinces today because of the development of a nationalist movement with separatist overtones. Insurgents have already kidnapped and killed Chinese engineers in Gwadar.
But China persists. More than a gateway to the Indian Ocean, Gwadar, at least, will provide Beijing with, first, a listening post from where the Chinese may exert surveillance on hyper-strategic sea links as well as military activities of the Indian and American navies in the region, and second, dual-use civilian-military facilities providing a base for Chinese ships and submarines.
For the Indians, this is a direct threat. The Delhi-based Institute for Defence Studies and Analysis recently published a report on Pakistan: the "Gwadar port being so close to the Straits of Hormuz also has implications for India as it would enable Pakistan to exercise control over energy routes. It is believed that Gwadar will provide Beijing with a facility to monitor US and Indian naval activity in the Persian Gulf and Arabian Sea, respectively, as well as any future maritime cooperation between India and the US."
India responded by helping Iran with the port of Chabahar. Work on the Chabahar-Milak-Zaranj-Dilaram route from Iran to Afghanistan is in progress. India has already built the 213-kilometer Zaranj-Dilaram road in Afghanistan's Nimroz province and helps Iran to upgrade the Chabahar-Milak railroad. Developing railroads and port infrastructure near the border of Afghanistan could strengthen Iranian influence in Afghanistan, especially among the Shia and non-Pashtun ethnic groups.
However, this Indo-Iranian project is bound to suffer from two problems:
First, politically, Afghanistan is unstable and may not oblige Iran and India if the Taliban or any Pakistan-supported government is restored. Chabahar is also part of one of Iran's most volatile regions where anti-regime Sunni insurgents have launched repeated attacks.
Secondly, the work is far behind schedule. In July 2010, Iranian Deputy Foreign Minister Mohd Ali Fathollahi said the port was functional, but has a capacity of only 2.5 million tons per year, whereas the target was 12 million tons. Speeding work on the port was urged during the 16th Indo-Iranian Joint Commission meeting, attended by Iranian Finance Minister Seyed Shamseddin Hosseini and India's External Affairs Minister S.M. Krishna, who pointed out that "Iran's assistance in developing the Chabahar port has been slow ‘til now."
The connection between Gwadar and China remains distant, but could be the Suez Canal of the 21st century. At the minimum, this deep-sea port should provide Beijing with a strategic base soon.
The Chinese move prompted India to react - hence the development of Chabahar. But in developing this port, New Delhi must factor in US attempts at isolating Iran because of Tehran's nuclear policy. How far the Indo-Iranian rapprochement is compatible with the growing Indo-American alliance remains to be seen.
The US and India may agree on the need to counter growing Chinese influence in Gwadar, but may also disagree on the policy India wants to pursue by joining hands with Iran.
Iran itself may not want to take any risk at alienating China, a country which has supported Tehran, including its nuclear policy, until recently.
Christophe Jaffrelot is a senior research fellow with the Centre for International Studies and Research, Sciences Po/CNRS.
RealClearWorld - A Chinese-Indian Rivalry for the Arabian Sea
the major problem is that indian politicians are too much involved in internal politics that they dont get time for international politics, moreover they should become a broker of peace between iran and usa in order to make ties with both good and cosy. as usa and India both want access to central asia having good ties with iran will make both or atleast India getting upper hand. iran and pakistan were not good neighbor since long time but in past few months iran has walked mant extra mile to get closer to pakista by donating pakistan 100 million dollar in flood assistance and making pakistan part of IPI pipeline now restricted to IP pipeline only. India becoming broker of peace and dialogue will be on the model of china becoming the same for pakistan and the advantage china is getting is not hidden from anyone. but lets see how this govt with more emphasis on rai bareli seat than iran figure out a solution.
Iran trying to become closer to Pakistan could be because Iran would like to get the Pipeline executed and in turn they get the much needed Hard Currency. Iranian economy is in a mess and with the sanctions in place it is not helping.
US threatens Pakistan with sanctions over Iran gas pipeline deal
I can't see this going ahead giving the sanctions on Iran. Any company that is investing in Iran or working on this project will be sanctioned as well and why would any Indian company take the risk. Until we get the green signal from Uncle Sam like we did with the Turkey sponsored Iranian oil payment, this will be stuck.
The other option is taking the Caspian sea route out of Turkey or maybe even working with China to evacuate minerals through their track and then into India via Tibet. Ofcourse there is always the option of using the one-way transit through Pakistan but without having alternative links Central Asia is pretty much out of India's reach at present.
ejazr, this is where Indian diplomacy will have to work very nimble footed. They have to convince Uncle Sam that unless India, a democratic country keeps engaged with Iran, it will otherwise leave the doors open to China. Iran in China's corner and getting full protection at the UN, like Sudan will be a big thorn for the US and it's allies in the GCC.
Also we need the Iranian route to Central Asian region, looking at the way developments are going on in Turkey. It always pays to keep options open and a pragmatic approach from both India and the US will reap the benefits in the future.
Users Browsing this Thread
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)