India's nuclear deterrence lacks capability: Analyst

  1. #1
    Senior Member nandu
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    Jamshedpur,INDIA
    Posts
    1,908
    Likes
    10
    India
    India's nuclear deterrence lacks capability: Analyst

    NEW DELHI: India's nuclear deterrence lacks capability and the country needs to build up its stockpile of fissile material to correct this, a leading defence analyst said Monday.

    "We need to build up our fissile material stockpiles because our deterrence lacks capability," Brig. (retd) Gurmeet Kanwal said at a seminar here on "Nuclear Arsenals post 2010" organised by the Indian Navy-funded National Maritime Foundation.

    Kanwal noted in this context that India lacked nuclear submarines capable of launching SLBMs (submarine-launched ballistic missiles) that are considered the most credible form of deterrence in case of a nuclear attack.

    As Rear Admiral (retd) K. Raja Menon put it, an SLBM "is the most stabilising element of a second strike capability" in case of a nuclear attack.

    India has repeatedly said that it would not be the first to use nuclear weapons in case of a war with Pakistan but experts point out that given its limited delivery capabilities of delivering these from the air or from the ground, this would make the country vulnerable in case of war.

    Urging greater transparency in the decision making process on building a credible deterrence against a nuclear attack, he deprecated the fact that the armed forces were kept out of the process.

    "The armed forces stay out of the discussions because they take their lead from their political masters. Transparency leads to greater credibility," maintained Kanwal, who heads the Indian Army-funded think tank Centre for Land Warfare Studies (CLAWS).

    Bharat Karnad, another analyst, concurred with Kanwal.

    "Much of the strategising (on countering a nuclear threat) is done outside of the armed forces. But then, the Indian military mirrors the political confusion in the country," he said.

    "There is too much of nuancing rather than getting about making a deterrent a deterrent," he added.

    http://economictimes.indiatimes.com/...ow/6047491.cms

  2. #2
    Full Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Posts
    15
    Likes
    0
    Is there any foundation like National Maritime Foundation which is funded by Indian Air Force

  3. #3
    Senior Member ppgj
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Posts
    2,030
    Likes
    35
    India
    yes there is.

    you did not read the article correctly.

    here -

    http://www.maritimeindia.org/index.php

  4. #4
    Elite Member hit&run
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Posts
    2,869
    Likes
    1136
    India
    Defence analysts never say full. Only i can second that we do not have nuclear tipped SLBMs. But my question is that do we have experience and resources to have a submarine fleet with live stock of nuclear BMs on board.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. Nuclear capability of India and China
    By john70 in forum Defence & Strategic Issues
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 19-04-12, 08:56 PM
  2. Ten Serious Flaws In Nuclear Deterrence Theory
    By Yusuf in forum International Politics
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 27-03-12, 11:38 AM
  3. Replies: 4
    Last Post: 21-01-12, 06:31 AM
  4. Replies: 0
    Last Post: 03-12-11, 11:24 AM
  5. Replies: 2
    Last Post: 29-06-11, 05:44 PM