@Razor
Let's talk about some of the US interference you mentioned above:
1)
Japan, on hindsight do you think it was bad for America to forcibly open Japan to modernization? Do you think Japan would have achieved the level of affluence it is now experiencing without American interference? I for one strongly believe that it would have been very hard for Japan to achieve the spectacular modernization it did at the turn of the last century if it stuck to its Feudal-agricultural set up.
Maybe you can ask Japanese now if it was a mistake for the US to forcibly open their country in the 19th century?
You can believe whatever you want.
But this is like saying CCP was good for China and KMT was bad or vice versa. You do not know how japan would have evolved if America had not interfered.
You are simply making assumptions in desperate attempt to justify the fact that america has a habit of interfering in internal affairs of other nations.
You said America didn't do that, I said it did do that.
PS: in spite of what the media tells you, japanese people do not have much respect for amrikans starting from the perry incident to nuke bombing, to raping of minors by US "soldiers" stationed in japan, and so on.
2)
Russia, well Russia is not an innocent player in international power struggle. It is in the thick of international interference, just look at Ukraine.
US interference in russia starts in late 19th century maybe even earlier.
The current puppet regime america has installed in ukraine is just one among the many many interventions that america/brit has done in russia. If the russians have responded, they have every right to do so.
3)
China, At least the latest American interference, if you can call it at that, during the 1990's (opening up by Clinton) was very good for China. I don't think the Chinese objected to it. The only other interference I see now by the US on China is in the South China Sea plan of the latter. Now, would you rather that America just let China steamroll these smaller SEA countries (Vietnam, Philippines, etc.) You can ask some Vietnamese and the Filipinos if they want the Americans not to interfere now in their spat with China over the contested islands in the South China Sea.
The previous interference of America on Chinese affairs was in the 19th century, but then again everybody were interefering in its affairs including the Russians. Ever heard of the Chinese Soviet Republic? Now are you prepared to condemn Russia in its interference in Chinese affairs?
4)
Korea, the AMericans began interfering in Korea only in the late 1940's during the division of that country (Russia was also interfering in support of Kim). Then when communist North Korea invaded America directly interfered there. But you have to understand that it was the Cold War and the US was determined to stop communist expansion (Russia was behind teh North Koreans in everything). So, if you want to harp on American interference there then you should also include the Russians.
But I think one American interference in Korea that even you will agree on is on its support and protection of South Korea. Without American norturing of SOuth Korea it would have long ago ceased to exist or even if it survived the North Korea-Russian-Chinese alliance. Now South Korea is a thriving capitalist country because of American interference (of course coupled with South Korean determination to succeed).
Just like the Japanese, maybe you can try asking South Koreans of all ages now if they think it was a mistake for America to interfere in Korean affairs during the Korean War? Good luck with that.
5)
SEA, you mean Vietnam? Well it was the height of the Cold War. After the bloody Korean War America became more sensitive to communist expansion in Asia. The Americans saw the problems in South Vietnam as a communist expansion rather than an independence movement. They were right partly as the USSR was actively supporting North Vietnam.
6)
South America, Well it was the Cold War.
7)
Europe, I don;t know what American interference you want to point out there. The Europeans are independent right now because of American interference.
8)
Middle East, it's very hard to generalize the Middle East. Again, most of American "interference" there happened after WW2 with the waning British power. I think the biggest American mistakes in the ME are Iran and Iraq.
But bear in mind that the USSR jostling for influence in the region after WW2. Their only problem was that they were strategically outmaneuvered and outsmarted by the Americans in most situations. But make no mistake, the USSR equally wanted to influence the ME.
blah blah blah and blah blah blah
Essentially you re saying america has every right to interfere in every other country, because the sovereignty of every country is of no consequence, and because somehow in your magical world every intervention was a good thing.
Sure, whatever. Even being an american-malaysian your level of sycophancy is astounding.