Twins converted brothers arrested for terror acts

SADAKHUSH

Senior Member
Joined
Sep 7, 2010
Messages
1,839
Likes
780
Country flag
another arrest of twin brothers who recently converted to Islamic religion have been arrested as one of them was about to board plane bound for Syria. When are we going to get handle on this widespread cancer around the world. Do we have to curb our freedom to do the things we are accustomed to or have an all out war against those who recruit them and facilitate them to act against democratic society?

Another new development has been in the Indian subcontinent that ISIS has gained foothold in Afghanistan and Pakistan. What does it mean for Indian and U.S.A. collaboration to fight terror elements in the region? Pakistan claims to be winning against the local Taliban elements where as NATO alliance was not able to destroy the Talibans and Al-Queda from that region but were moved to the ME region. They are coming back with much more brutal mentality and it is going to be more bloodbath on AFPAK soil than ever experienced. If it happens what are the chances for NATO alliance to come back to contain or destroy them.
 

jackprince

Turning into a frog
Senior Member
Joined
Mar 30, 2009
Messages
4,951
Likes
16,836
Country flag
Another new development has been in the Indian subcontinent that ISIS has gained foothold in Afghanistan and Pakistan. What does it mean for Indian and U.S.A. collaboration to fight terror elements in the region? Pakistan claims to be winning against the local Taliban elements where as NATO alliance was not able to destroy the Talibans and Al-Queda from that region but were moved to the ME region. They are coming back with much more brutal mentality and it is going to be more bloodbath on AFPAK soil than ever experienced. If it happens what are the chances for NATO alliance to come back to contain or destroy them.
It means that the danger to India has just been multiplied as ISIS has been proven to be led by a very smart - vicious and atrocious - but smart bunch of people who have a more dedicated group of butchers in their ranks. ISIS taking over of Pakistan should not be allowed as Pak's arsenal of Nukes will present a definite risk of getting one of our major cities going up in smokes. ISIS leadership wouldn't care, as unlike current regime their power-centre would not be affected when India retaliates in kind.
 

sorcerer

Senior Member
Joined
Apr 13, 2013
Messages
26,919
Likes
98,471
Country flag
The first and foremost thing to do by all countries who are keen on fighting terrorist is to stop classifying them as good bad and the ugly terrorists.

This in itself will be much relief.
Alliances who fight should use the host countries assets of allied assets to protect its convoy or resources than pay the 'merceneries' (who later becomes terrorists) for protection,.

have an all out war against those who recruit them and facilitate them to act against democratic society?
Aiding terrorism is worse than terrorism itself. Countries should deport the terrorist, the ones who support it directly or indirectly with their whole family back to their own country. Such will stop these scum living on the expense of taxpayers money and benefits; who inturn will not hesitiate bite them at the very first chance.

Pakistan claims to be winning against the local Taliban elements where as NATO alliance was not able to destroy the Talibans and Al-Queda from that region but were moved to the ME region.
Pakistan can win its staged drama on terror cuz its the ISI who stages it all. Pak agency, ISI has been taking the USA and the west on wild goose chase. A lot of screwed up counter terror operations are staged by ISI.

NATO should facilitate intel agencies from serious regional players who are keen on fighting terrorism and use them to gather intel. This will ensure that enough actionable data is collected(minus the ISI intereference) which can bring about progress in WoT.
 

sorcerer

Senior Member
Joined
Apr 13, 2013
Messages
26,919
Likes
98,471
Country flag
It means that the danger to India has just been multiplied as ISIS has been proven to be led by a very smart - vicious and atrocious - but smart bunch of people who have a more dedicated group of butchers in their ranks. ISIS taking over of Pakistan should not be allowed as Pak's arsenal of Nukes will present a definite risk of getting one of our major cities going up in smokes. ISIS leadership wouldn't care, as unlike current regime their power-centre would not be affected when India retaliates in kind.
Countries should use the 'perception ' of Daesh threat to dismantle Pak of its nuke for ever. Its high time and the right time.
 

SADAKHUSH

Senior Member
Joined
Sep 7, 2010
Messages
1,839
Likes
780
Country flag
The first and foremost thing to do by all countries who are keen on fighting terrorist is to stop classifying them as good bad and the ugly terrorists.

This in itself will be much relief.
Alliances who fight should use the host countries assets of allied assets to protect its convoy or resources than pay the 'merceneries' (who later becomes terrorists) for protection,.

Aiding terrorism is worse than terrorism itself. Countries should deport the terrorist, the ones who support it directly or indirectly with their whole family back to their own country. Such will stop these scum living on the expense of taxpayers money and benefits; who inturn will not hesitiate bite them at the very first chance.

Pakistan can win its staged drama on terror cuz its the ISI who stages it all. Pak agency, ISI has been taking the USA and the west on wild goose chase. A lot of screwed up counter terror operations are staged by ISI.

NATO should facilitate intel agencies from serious regional players who are keen on fighting terrorism and use them to gather intel. This will ensure that enough actionable data is collected(minus the ISI intereference) which can bring about progress in WoT.
I agree with you. It is very common excuse among the leaders of West to classify them into two categories and they have to stop saying that terror has no religion. We are talking about the perpetrator of terrorism who claim to be doing so in the name of their religion. So, how can rest of the world deny them the ownership of such acts when they take responsibility of their own actions?

We cannot deport individuals born in a country from where they carry out these activities. We have revoked the passport of one or two Canadians who have joined the terrorist groups overseas. We can only take action with in the constitution of our country. The family cannot be deported or held responsible for action of one member of their family. We cannot even think of initiating such a move because once again action has to be taken within the framework of our constitution.

We should also use the citizens of countries where the terrorist are being trained and carry out the operation as and when required. Pakistan is playing USA against China. Once we succeed in De nuking the terrorist PA then they will calm down and learn to live with rest of the world peacefully.
 
Last edited:

pmaitra

Senior Member
Joined
Mar 10, 2009
Messages
33,262
Likes
19,594
another arrest of twin brothers who recently converted to Islamic religion have been arrested as one of them was about to board plane bound for Syria. When are we going to get handle on this widespread cancer around the world. Do we have to curb our freedom to do the things we are accustomed to or have an all out war against those who recruit them and facilitate them to act against democratic society?

Another new development has been in the Indian subcontinent that ISIS has gained foothold in Afghanistan and Pakistan. What does it mean for Indian and U.S.A. collaboration to fight terror elements in the region? Pakistan claims to be winning against the local Taliban elements where as NATO alliance was not able to destroy the Talibans and Al-Queda from that region but were moved to the ME region. They are coming back with much more brutal mentality and it is going to be more bloodbath on AFPAK soil than ever experienced. If it happens what are the chances for NATO alliance to come back to contain or destroy them.
Where did the incident in the first paragraph happen? Where is the source?
 

SADAKHUSH

Senior Member
Joined
Sep 7, 2010
Messages
1,839
Likes
780
Country flag
http://r.search.yahoo.com/_ylt=A0LE...th-twins/RK=0/RS=6W5b5KfdeRKMH1GfGSiPoFq2RBY-

The above link is for your reference. You can check all the Canadian news media. It is old news and there have been new developments on this front.

It happened on January 13, 2014. The latest is three brothers have been killed in Syria. These young men are mostly from Somalian community.

Our Government is also introducing change in law to increase co-operation between agencies to share information which was not being done due to the privacy issues.
 
Last edited:

Dark Sorrow

Respected Member
Senior Member
Joined
Mar 24, 2009
Messages
4,988
Likes
9,931
The first and foremost thing to do by all countries who are keen on fighting terrorist is to stop classifying them as good bad and the ugly terrorists.
I agree with you completely but what is happening is that nations are separating terrorist on basis of their interest.
What is happened is that if a particular terrorist organization and a country are fighting against a common enemy the country label the terrorist organization as good terrorist rest all as bad.
 

sorcerer

Senior Member
Joined
Apr 13, 2013
Messages
26,919
Likes
98,471
Country flag
I agree with you completely but what is happening is that nations are separating terrorist on basis of their interest.
What is happened is that if a particular terrorist organization and a country are fighting against a common enemy the country label the terrorist organization as good terrorist rest all as bad.
Absolutely,
The way Taliban is being classified as good ones when... they protect convoys and the moment they use the same protection money against USA or theri allies, they become bad terrorist.
:D

Retard west or is there a better term?
 

Global Defence

New threads

Articles

Top